I only read part of this and stopped. This seems to be a satire on some personal jokes between you and your friends, so I really don't get it and I'm not sure what I'd get out of it.
There are no personal jokes to be found in this satire. This is a satire of reviewing in general, and the next evolution from my previous two satire reviews of perkinsj26: the game, and perkinsj26 2: Rise of Sexweapons. If you didn't like it, I understand.
But in order to make a satire utilizing your GS friends' personalities and tying it to the satire usually means you are using inside jokes. I don't know Sexyweapons or WARCAR18, and I barely know perkinsj26 so using these unknown figures in your satire is lost on me, that's what I'm trying to say. I reread it with what you said in mind, and it has it's cool moments but it's mostly lost on me without really knowing these people.
There are no personal jokes to be found in this satire. This is a satire of reviewing in general, and the next evolution from my previous two satire reviews of perkinsj26: the game, and perkinsj26 2: Rise of Sexweapons. If you didn't like it, I understand.rigbybot127
Think of it like this: what I have just described in my blog post, is what I feel the perfect video game would be. Also, it's just a sequel to my perkinsj26 and perkins26 2: Rise of Sexweapons satire reviews, except this "game" was actually good. :)
In that case, setting up the backdrop for the reader, along with including a link to the previous review, would help a LOT.
Think of it like this: what I have just described in my blog post, is what I feel the perfect video game would be. Also, it's just a sequel to my perkinsj26 and perkins26 2: Rise of Sexweapons satire reviews, except this "game" was actually good. :)rigbybot127
Log in to comment