[QUOTE="sephy37"][QUOTE="GVETA"]Kill WWE? WWE is way bigger then TNA and to put it simple, WWE has the most powerful weapon, COLD HARD CASH. But I agree that WWE needs some healthy competition which will force them to come up with better storylines, whether or not TNA'll be able to deliver this kind of competition is another matter. Link256
keiblerfan69 and i actually watch tna. you, i'm guessing (goldberg fan :P), probably hasn't watched any or know any superstars or heard of it until you came to WWEv. we know what we are talking about. the product right now and since 2004, has been way better than the wwe. once spiketv realizes that it is pulling in good ratings on saturday night, they will switch it to monday night. then wwe will have a run for it's money (figuratively speaking :P).
Actually, I am going to have to disagree. I know most people on here who watch both TNA and WWE think WWE is lame right now and TNA is great, but TNA is far from great IMHO (and yes I watch TNA). As Vince Russo said: "TNA has got the wrestling part down, but needs a lot work on the story-line part." I know everyone says TNA is all about the wrestling and less about the story-line, but that is because their story-line writing is lame IMHO.
Also, TNA has many problems with booking in the past. Thirdly, if you think WWE backstage drama is crazy, you should really hear what is going on backstage at TNA. I can understand if you and Keiblerfan 69 feel that WWE is lame and TNA is great, but you need to realize that some us actually think TNA is far from perfect and are actually enjoying WWE (such as myself).
Finally, for everyone that think WWE 2005 is bad, they should really take a look at WWE 2001 (Invansion anyone?) or WWF/E 1995 (Disel as Champ and Mable as KOTR), because both years are truly bad WWE/F years IMHO.
I will say it once and I will say it again, WWE has gotten great again (at least for my personal enjoyment) since late 2003 (mainly Raw). I have not enjoyed wrestling this much since 2000 WWF/E. Yes, is no where near perfect, but it still is very good IMHO. Even SmackDown has improved lately, since the draft/trade of 2005.
you are absolutely right. wwe i think has finally gotten out of the rut this year. 2005 has been a great year so far and summerslam does not look to dissapoint. but TNA kill WWE? wont happen because WWE is global. while TNA is NA. WWE also makes twice as much money then TNA a year and has a lot bigger fanbase then TNA. The last two pay per views imo have been amazing.
Log in to comment