Who should end Taker's WM Streak?

yes, if they don't give him the world title let him have his record

If it has to be someone it has to be Kane. As The_Dude14 said before Taker made Kane look like a tool in their match at WM20 and he was right about that playing a major role in the downfall of Kane. I think it's time for Kane to return the favour.hbk91

Agree 100%

Kane should be the one to end Undertaker's streak.

no body, Undertaker will be known for his unbelievable winning streak at WrestleMania. No one should take that title, but wwe being as it is today, might. But if i had to choose someone, i would pick SCSADark_Hylian8

I agree. Undertaker is known for his undefeated streak and if he just loses at Wrestlemania it be like those past victories meant nothing.

He should keep that record, as a prize for all the years he's wrestled

[QUOTE="Dark_Hylian8"]no body, Undertaker will be known for his unbelievable winning streak at WrestleMania. No one should take that title, but wwe being as it is today, might. But if i had to choose someone, i would pick SCSAY2Gee

I agree. Undertaker is known for his undefeated streak and if he just loses at Wrestlemania it be like those past victories meant nothing.

Undertaker isn't known only for his undeafeted strreak, he's behind the creation of some of the best gimmick matches, had great fueds with HBK, Mick Foley, Stone Cold (he beat Hogan twice and both times for the title:D). What I'm trying to say is that the streak, IMHO, isn't that important. Don't get me wrong I don't want Taker to lose at WM but if it gas to be done he must lose to another legend like HBK, Mick Foley, Stone Cold or Bret (NOT TO HOGAN or any rookie). As for him losing to Kane, don't you think Undertaker vs Kane 3 will be a little bit much (on the other hand people do like trilogys nowadays and WWE going the Hollywood way, who knows?). And one more thing, can you explain to me what the Undertaker had to do with Kane's downfall? He hasn't been writing this stupid storylines or anything.