Why does WWE even try?

TNA's product is SO MUCH BETER than the WWE's. The WWE may have some awesome wrestlers (Edge, Batista, Undertaker), but TNA has some of the best matches of all time (like Joe vs. Angle MMA match or Abyss vs. Flair) and they aren't PG! Mr. Anderson, right now, is probably the best wrestler in the world. He puts everyone in the WWE to shame with his mic skills. TNA also has actual tag teams. Beer Money were better than any team Chris Jericho was in and the current tag team champions are really bad. And lets not forget the biggest reason TNA is better than WWE...legends. TNA has Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair, Sean Waltman, Kevin Nash, RVD, Jeff Hardy, that one Guerrero, Stevie Richards, Jeff Jarret, Eric Bischoff, Kurt Angle, Scott Hall, Rhino, Orlando Jordan, Raven, Mick Foley, Taz, Team 3D, and Sting. WWE HAS NEVER HAD STING! So what does that say about WWE. Plus TNA listens to the fans (like the new ranking system) and puts on matches that people actually want to see. Nobody wanted to see Evan Bourne wrestle on Monday, WWE, so way to fail. 

How long until TNA starts beating WWE in the ratings? I give it a year and a half. TNA has been amazing since Bischoff and Hogan came. Its been nothing but huge shows and big names. TNA IS WRESTLING

You're only 13 and still young. You need to look at the bigger picture here. WWE wrestling has gotten a little better this year compare to the last few years. Granted, they do talk alot on RAW and matches tend to be short, but their product overall has the better feel. TNA product is just a mess overall. One minute something is cool, the next it's a HOT MESS. Their product don't stay consistent, whereas, WWE their product stays consisitent, even if their bookings doesn't make much sense.

I'll give you this about TNA. They had a pretty good product in the years of 2004-2007, then they just fell flat after those years, TNA now is all about bringing old guys from the past and doing something with them that nobody no longer cares, so that is why their ratings are slipping. TNA needs to do some touring with iMPACT so people can at least get the exposure of a product that some people don't know about, and it'll at least feel fresh instead of being in that god awful iMPACT zone on a weekly basis. Those crowd pisses me off.

...Yeah, TNA won't be catching up to WWE anytime soon. Oh, and Mr. Anderson isn't even close to being the "best wrestler in the world".

 And lets not forget the biggest reason TNA is better than WWE...legends.

Edge_Head5000

*Proceeds to list Sean Waltman, Orlando Jordan*Edge_Head5000

 Well, I laughed. :P

You picked the wrong union to post this BS. Take it from someone who's been there.

Obvious troll is obvious.

You picked the wrong union to post this BS. Take it from someone who's been there.

WGTC007

Trying too hard. The good ones know how to pick their spots.

On the other hand, I could sell tickets to a Madgamer vs Edgehead debate.

This is why WWEv can never get new members. You all just flame people if they have a different opinion.

You guys are the trolls

So I'm guessing nobody wants to see the 5 page statement I wrote on why Hornswoggle deserves to be IC Champion?ballin1347

This is why WWEv can never get new members. You all just flame people if they have a different opinion.

You guys are the trolls

sephy37

New members are great. TNA is not. Plus, couldn't he just post this in the random wrestling thread lol

it may be off topic but i just saw im not the only one with a gen starwing pic for there profile

another outlaw star fan :) but ontopic this guy is a silly little **** i havent watched wrestling in 3 years and i bet tna still only pulls around a 1.4 in rating

it may be off topic but i just saw im not the only one with a gen starwing pic for there profile

another outlaw star fan :) but ontopic this guy is a silly little **** i havent watched wrestling in 3 years and i bet tna still only pulls around a 1.4 in rating

alljoemama92

TNA's highest ever was a 1.5 on January 4. And now they do...  0.85 weekly or so. 

Listen young one, TNA has some great stars. They even have great matches sometimes, but TNA isn't better then WWE at the moment. I am a fan of Kenndy, don't get me wrong, but he isn't the best in the world.

WWE has never had Sting?  Well it is a loss, but TNA never had The Rock, Stone Cold, Undertaker, Shawn Michaels and the list goes on. Just think about that. What does that say about TNA.

"Nobody wanted to see Evan Bourne wrestle on Monday, WWE, so way to fail." First of all, Evan Bourne is an awesome wrestler, you might disagree, but he has in ring skills. There is no denying that.

When Kurt Angle joined TNA he said TNA would be up with WWE right now, guess what. They are not, they have the ratings of NXT. That is saying something.

Big names like Hogan doesn't mean crap, he ran WCW in to the ground because of his politics and greed. It's the soul and the wrestlers that make the wrestling, not some old geezers who's prime were in the 80's

i can discuss any of the points with you, but you can't make statements and sell them as facts

When Kurt Angle joined TNA he said TNA would be up with WWE right now, guess what. They are not, they have the ratings of NXT. That is saying something.The_Last_Ride

In all fairness, even NXT was beating them frequently. I think the only show TNA is actually beating by the WWE is Superstars, and that's only just beating them.

This is why WWEv can never get new members. You all just flame people if they have a different opinion.

You guys are the trolls

sephy37

[QUOTE="The_Last_Ride"]When Kurt Angle joined TNA he said TNA would be up with WWE right now, guess what. They are not, they have the ratings of NXT. That is saying something.Redders1989

In all fairness, even NXT was beating them frequently. I think the only show TNA is actually beating by the WWE is Superstars, and that's only just beating them.

yeah, but i was trying to educate this young man in some wrestling facts

This is why WWEv can never get new members. You all just flame people if they have a different opinion.

You guys are the trollssephy37

My fault for not speaking up sooner, but enough. Just let the TC have whatever opinion he wants. No reason to attack him for it. If you do not approve of the discussion, then do not post. It's that simple.

Otherwise, keep it on topic, or this thread will be locked.

Well as long as things are kept respectful, others are allowed to disagree with another opinions.mrgab

yeah that is very true, we are allowed are opinions, like i did^^

[QUOTE="The_Last_Ride"]When Kurt Angle joined TNA he said TNA would be up with WWE right now, guess what. They are not, they have the ratings of NXT. That is saying something.Redders1989

In all fairness, even NXT was beating them frequently. I think the only show TNA is actually beating by the WWE is Superstars, and that's only just beating them.

Actually, it seems to change sometimes. When they first moved back to Thursday, Superstars was ahead, and some weeks it does get ahead. But also, you have to realize not that many people care about just wrestling matches anymore. There are a lot of fans that watch for the promos and storylines. Also, Superstars is mostly people that would be jobbers without it, except the occasional appearance by upper-midcard guys.

they try b/c they want to change the opinons of wrestling fans like yourself... stay classy WWEvToTheBank

Honestly, it doesn't seem like they're trying to change our opinion for the better. It seems like they've adopted the WE'RE GOING TO PROVE THAT EVEN WITH A TV-14 RATING, WRESTLING CAN STILL SUCK. TNA has had some of the worst storylines in the past and it has some pretty terrible ones now. Yea, they put on good matches and have some great wrestlers, but that means nothing if you can't properly invest people into your storylines. I'd rather just see a bunch of ME WANT TITLE MATCH storylines than most of the crap on TNA today. 

This is why WWEv can never get new members. You all just flame people if they have a different opinion.

You guys are the trollssephy37

Exactly. Just because people have different opinions on something doesn't mean it's automatically wrong. Everyone here likes Punk, and I think he's one of the undeserving few to be pushed. Everyone thinks Wade Barrett is good, and I say he won't be here for Summerfest 2011. It just all depends on what your tastes are.

And sure GM, me and Edge_Head can battle it out, but i'll just lay down in the end.