WOTU Weekly Poll # 12

Once again, simple question this week.

Who do you want to return the most right now?

i hate the Undertakerkillerband55

So why do you despise The Undertaker? I'm just curious, that's all.

[QUOTE="killerband55"]i hate the UndertakerShowStopper102

So why do you despise The Undertaker? I'm just curious, that's all.

i'm not the only one, legenkiller hates him as well, anyway i dont like him cause he's very overrated, and its like he gets first class perks like picking when he wants to wrestle, i just cant stand him kinda how Big Evil cant stand Orton

[QUOTE="ShowStopper102"]

[QUOTE="killerband55"]i hate the Undertakerkillerband55

So why do you despise The Undertaker? I'm just curious, that's all.

i'm not the only one, legenkiller hates him as well, anyway i dont like him cause he's very overrated, and its like he gets first class perks like picking when he wants to wrestle, i just cant stand him kinda how Big Evil cant stand Orton

Taker's getting the picks because he is very valuable to the WWE, not because he's a great wrestler, but because he sells tickets. You'll get your wish though Killer, Taker won't last more than 2 years before he retires. If for some odd reason he decides to stay longer than that, then I too will learn to despise him. Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

WGTC007

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why. 

[QUOTE="ShowStopper102"]

[QUOTE="killerband55"]i hate the Undertakerkillerband55

So why do you despise The Undertaker? I'm just curious, that's all.

i'm not the only one, legenkiller hates him as well, anyway i dont like him cause he's very overrated, and its like he gets first class perks like picking when he wants to wrestle, i just cant stand him kinda how Big Evil cant stand Orton

Taker's been there long enough to have earned those "perks" as u call them. that's not even a legit reason to not like Taker.

and Orton's just as overrated if not more so. also i think he seems to have a few "perks" as well. seems to take some stroke to get someone fired over nothing

any way, i voted Both, WWE needs them badly.

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

SonicRenegade84

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"][QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

WGTC007

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

Crusader628

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He is a 6'10" 63 year-old man. Can't expect him to do much high-flying anymore.

Yeah, I'm surpised he's not walking to the ring with a cane.

[QUOTE="WGTC007"][QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"][QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

Crusader628

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He's actually 45, a couple of months older than Shawn. He does wrestle like a 63 year old sometimes though. Still standing to my point, Taker should consider retirement soon, very soon.

[QUOTE="Crusader628"][QUOTE="WGTC007"][QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"][QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

WGTC007

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He's actually 45, a couple of months older than Shawn. He does wrestle like a 63 year old sometimes though. Still standing to my point, Taker should consider retirement soon, very soon.

are u guys freakin kiddin me? have u not been watchin Taker's matches recently?! he still proves time and again that he can go out and deliver 5-star quality matches with anyone....ANYONE!

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="Crusader628"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

Big_Evil666

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He's actually 45, a couple of months older than Shawn. He does wrestle like a 63 year old sometimes though. Still standing to my point, Taker should consider retirement soon, very soon.

are u guys freakin kiddin me? have u not been watchin Taker's matches recently?! he still proves time and again that he can go out and deliver 5-star quality matches with anyone....ANYONE!

You're half in love with the guy, aren't you?

[QUOTE="Big_Evil666"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="Crusader628"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

jerk-o-tron2000

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He's actually 45, a couple of months older than Shawn. He does wrestle like a 63 year old sometimes though. Still standing to my point, Taker should consider retirement soon, very soon.

are u guys freakin kiddin me? have u not been watchin Taker's matches recently?! he still proves time and again that he can go out and deliver 5-star quality matches with anyone....ANYONE!

You're half in love with the guy, aren't you?

no that's got nothing to do with anything, i'm just not blinded like some people

[QUOTE="jerk-o-tron2000"]

[QUOTE="Big_Evil666"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="Crusader628"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"]

[QUOTE="WGTC007"]

Michaels knew when to retire, why can't he?

Big_Evil666

How many times has Micheals been injured in his career? Ok, now compare that to Taker. Ok, that's why.

Giving more reason for Taker to retire. He can barely dive outside these days.

He's actually 45, a couple of months older than Shawn. He does wrestle like a 63 year old sometimes though. Still standing to my point, Taker should consider retirement soon, very soon.

are u guys freakin kiddin me? have u not been watchin Taker's matches recently?! he still proves time and again that he can go out and deliver 5-star quality matches with anyone....ANYONE!

You're half in love with the guy, aren't you?

no that's got nothing to do with anything, i'm just not blinded like some people

"Blinded" is a strong word, Different viewed and wrong on the other hand...

well that's true. but it's one thing to rag on a wrestler when you're not even being remotely open-minded to how they perform. and say that they should retire when they're out there still giving great matches, sometimes better than most of the rest of the roster.

i know it's ironic coming from me

He still brings in the cash, plus he's one of the ONLY few people from WWF still there. Why would he retire?

SonicRenegade84

Yeah, he does reel in the cash, but the fact that he was around while the "Attitude Era" is almost rendered obsolete, due to the fact that they do not do what they used to do. The usefulness of that fact is pure nostalgia.

[QUOTE="SonicRenegade84"]

He still brings in the cash, plus he's one of the ONLY few people from WWF still there. Why would he retire?

jerk-o-tron2000

Yeah, he does reel in the cash, but the fact that he was around while the "Attitude Era" is almost rendered obsolete, due to the fact that they do not do what they used to do. The usefulness of that fact is pure nostalgia.

Yeah, you do have a point. Plus there's the fact that some wrestlers from the attitude era that are still in shape fight so sloppy, because there's no one to compete at top condition with.

Well they don't need them bad, new guys are coming up, so they don't really need themThe_Last_Ride

true

I voted both. All I see in the wwe are jobbers. Mostly due to me not watching it a lot but still. I miss the superstars I watchd a few years ago lol.

Gameslayer3

The more things change, the more they stay the same.