I'm not sure about online but I can comment on single-player... I thought Rainbow Six 3's single-player was more immersive and I got more involved more in it than I did in Black Arrow...
They are both excellent games. Black Arrow is much more multiplayer focused but the single player is very similar to Rainbow Six 3's. Black Arrow has clans and more multiplayer game types and I think it has more maps. Overall Black Arrow is better.
rainbow six lockdown is way cool also brothers in arm earned in blood has a great multi playerbipolar117I actually own Brothers In Arms: Earned In Blood. Great game. On the multiplayer modes side, how do both games fare, with regards to objective based games? I like the odd deathmatch here and there but I much prefer objectives. Which game has more?
i think black arrow is a bit better because it has more maps.lukey9898Yes, more maps is on black arrow
1. You find Halo 2’s multi-player to be “arcady”? I heard countless times that it has a very good multi-player mode, although I agree that many of the people playing aren’t nice at all.
Yes, I also heard that although Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Lockdown had very good single-player and multi-player modes (it got a score of eight from GameSpot), it had the feel of an arcade game.
I’m assuming you’re just asking about the Xbox versions of the games. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six 3 is said to have very good single-player and multi-player modes. It also got a score of eight from GameSpot. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six 3: Black Arrow is said to have just as good single-player and multi-player modes. It also got a score of eight from GameSpot. It would probably be better to get Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six 3 first.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment