3 Things i hate about COD 4

1.) GRENADE SPAMMING: At the start of every COD 4 game i play you have to run for cover from the inevitable volley of grenades and then spend the rest of the game dodging random grenades:x

2.) Martyrdom: You kill some one only to walk over there body and be blown away by that grenades he managed to pull why being loaded with bullets or even worse your playing hardcore and your team mate has it and he dies and you just happen to be close by and get wasted too:x

3.) Grenade Launcher: These ones are most common used at the volley at the start and are deadly accurate in the right hands at short or long distance....like from one side of the map to other! Also easy way to rake up kills:x

Let me know what you hate about COD 4?

I'll agree with the grenades, you ought to be limited a few during the whole match, never mind re-spawning.

The rest I don't agree with at all.

the one thing I hate about COD is the fact that if a host quits for any reason, the game ends and will count as a loss

1.) GRENADE SPAMMING: At the start of every COD 4 game i play you have to run for cover from the inevitable volley of grenades and then spend the rest of the game dodging random grenades:x

2.) Martyrdom: You kill some one only to walk over there body and be blown away by that grenades he managed to pull why being loaded with bullets or even worse your playing hardcore and your team mate has it and he dies and you just happen to be close by and get wasted too:x

3.) Grenade Launcher: These ones are most common used at the volley at the start and are deadly accurate in the right hands at short or long distance....like from one side of the map to other! Also easy way to rake up kills:x

Let me know what you hate about COD 4?

TheCerebralBore

firstly matrydom is a perk, not someone throwing a granade just as they die, secondly most random granades dont hit, its unluvky for u if they do, but i dont hate it. but i do agree about the granade launcher aka 'noob tube'

I dont hate anything in COD4, but I feel so stupid dying from Martyrdom. I know it's coming, I expect it, but I usually dont run away in time, lol.Elann2008

haha same here, or i see a teammate kill someone, and i think 'they probs are using matrydom' but hell i run as fast as i can towards them anyway haha

I usually run and gun to get high kill streaks after every kill I just listen for the martyrdom if I don't hear it I just keep running.

What i hate most is "Game Loby Closed" Or "Host Timed Out". WTF is Game loby closed mean?

i hate how the radius damage of your own grenade AND a matyrdom grenade is greater than a regular one... like on a matyrdom grenade if you see the grenade icon barely pop up BOOM DEAD......but that's why i always dont go near the person i just killed.

also a tip for those who cared to read this, when you see your teammate die, toss a grenade on or near his corpse, because 80% of the time the killer goes near it.

The 3 things I hate about COD 4 are

1. the single player campaign is way too short. $100 for a game that only takes 5 hours to complete is pathetic. $20 per hour is a joke. a cheap hooker costs less than that.

2. How everyone raves on and on and on about how good COD 4 is. When it is only a realistic based first person shooter game.

3. The game play wasn't that good, the story jumps from the British SAS operative and the US Marine. Although the game is a realistic shooter, the storyline is ficticious. so no better than an un-realistic shooter like Halo 3 or GOW.

The 3 things I hate about COD 4 are

1. the single player campaign is way too short. $100 for a game that only takes 5 hours to complete is pathetic. $20 per hour is a joke. a cheap hooker costs less than that.

2. How everyone raves on and on and on about how good COD 4 is. When it is only a realistic based first person shooter game.

3. The game play wasn't that good, the story jumps from the British SAS operative and the US Marine. Although the game is a realistic shooter, the storyline is ficticious. so no better than an un-realistic shooter like Halo 3 or GOW.

rexxpro

hmmm kinda confusing, it's realistic yet not? i dont think they were trying to make a simulator shooter. they just wanted a realistic LOOKING shooter.

I hate MartyDUMB (i misspelled that on purpose)..how in the world is a person going to magically pull a gernade out of their ass when theyre dead???? I dont mind the GL as much, but it can get very annoying.....The P90 is trash.....SO many people "spray and pray" thats rly annoying

What i hate most is "Game Loby Closed" Or "Host Timed Out". WTF is Game loby closed mean?

Pump_man44

The patch they're about to come out with is supposed to fix all those problems.

The 3 things I hate about COD 4 are

1. the single player campaign is way too short. $100 for a game that only takes 5 hours to complete is pathetic. $20 per hour is a joke. a cheap hooker costs less than that.

2. How everyone raves on and on and on about how good COD 4 is. When it is only a realistic based first person shooter game.

3. The game play wasn't that good, the story jumps from the British SAS operative and the US Marine. Although the game is a realistic shooter, the storyline is ficticious. so no better than an un-realistic shooter like Halo 3 or GOW.

rexxpro

2.It is a FPS,a good FPS for the 360

3. Do you watch the news?

M16: Can out snipe a sniper rifle and at close range it is a shotgun, at medium range you'r completely ****ed. Such an overpowered weapon, hate it, hate anyone that uses it, and anyone that does use it and says its "not over powered" but that "all the other weapons are underpowered" is an idiot...

Noob Tube: Kinda annoying,easy to use and rapes at medium range

M16 with noob tube and stopping power: Don't get me started....

there are only two things i hate about COD4....one is definately the random gernades and the other is that if you barely even close enough to the gernades radius you die about 90% of the time...at least in COD 2 and 3 if you barely are in the radius you didnt die at all

theres a simple solution to having that many problems with a game, STOP PLAYING IT!

COD4 is a great, overall, well balanced game and they put wepons in there to weild as much damage as they do to stay true to "modern warfare" Now if you think that an m16 isnt superior in battlefields, you're an idiot. Plus, who cares what perk or what gun is superior to whatever. Its all there for you to choose. IMO youre a 'noob' if you dont use these to ur advantage to try to brag about it and boost your ego. you can kill some one in a gun fight using a knife, but youre still an idiot for not holding a gun.

theres a simple solution to having that many problems with a game, STOP PLAYING IT!

COD4 is a great, overall, well balanced game and they put wepons in there to weild as much damage as they do to stay true to "modern warfare" Now if you think that an m16 isnt superior in battlefields, you're an idiot. Plus, who cares what perk or what gun is superior to whatever. Its all there for you to choose. IMO youre a 'noob' if you dont use these to ur advantage to try to brag about it and boost your ego. you can kill some one in a gun fight using a knife, but youre still an idiot for not holding a gun.

IIMurderFaceII

The M16 may be superior on the battlefield, but the Barret .50 cal is an anti-armor rifle, yet its a 2-hit kill, and games (specially slightly arcade ones ergo this) aren't about realism they are about keeping everything balanced and good, the M16 isn't balanced, and even if everybody used it then there would be no point in being any other class, and if you're going down the realism lane shouldn't the arabs and russians only be allowed AK47s and 74s etc? Its just not fun having one completely dominant weapon with all the others pretty evenly balanced (possibly with the exception of shotguns which never seem to do as well as other similar but slightly less restrictive guns).

1. Juggernaunt, it wastes my ammo, it should only be accessable for low level ranks like 1-30. Other than that if you're in prestige mode you shouldn't be using it unless you're a really bad player or slow on the reflexes, this combined with marytrdom is pure noobage.

2. Not enough ammo in multiplayer, so you get 90 rounds in all in the m16, 30 in clip and 60 reserve. Come on. Thankfully bandolier solves that problem later in the game but you can't use other useful stuff like rpg or c-4.

3. Face it, COD4 is not sniper friendly, theres only a handful of sniper friendly maps to play on, other than that most maps are full of corners and viewpoint obstructions.

[QUOTE="IIMurderFaceII"]

theres a simple solution to having that many problems with a game, STOP PLAYING IT!

COD4 is a great, overall, well balanced game and they put wepons in there to weild as much damage as they do to stay true to "modern warfare" Now if you think that an m16 isnt superior in battlefields, you're an idiot. Plus, who cares what perk or what gun is superior to whatever. Its all there for you to choose. IMO youre a 'noob' if you dont use these to ur advantage to try to brag about it and boost your ego. you can kill some one in a gun fight using a knife, but youre still an idiot for not holding a gun.

Satanshelper

The M16 may be superior on the battlefield, but the Barret .50 cal is an anti-armor rifle, yet its a 2-hit kill, and games (specially slightly arcade ones ergo this) aren't about realism they are about keeping everything balanced and good, the M16 isn't balanced, and even if everybody used it then there would be no point in being any other class, and if you're going down the realism lane shouldn't the arabs and russians only be allowed AK47s and 74s etc? Its just not fun having one completely dominant weapon with all the others pretty evenly balanced (possibly with the exception of shotguns which never seem to do as well as other similar but slightly less restrictive guns).

Im not going down any fantasy, realistic, or whatever lane. I'm simply saying that the game was created like that and there is no changing it. Most argue that the p90 is far too superior as an smg, but almost every assult rifle will take it out given the right distance. the mp5 and the p90 will both destroy m16 at close range (given that the m16 doesnt shoot first to the head and that ur not already weakened). Either way, I dont see why you dont just use all this to ur advantage. I do use the m16 sometimes, in large maps, but its by far, not my favorite gun. And as far as gernade spaming, everyone does it, and everyone gets a slight sense of joy when they get that easy skilless kill.. haha. Solution: Dont run out early and wait 2 seconds at the start.

I like playing this game but i think i prefer COD3.

1. the single player campaign is way too short. $100 for a game that only takes 5 hours to complete is pathetic. $20 per hour is a joke. a cheap hooker costs less than that.

rexxpro

If you paid $100 for COD4, you deserve..........., wait, I cannot let myself pick on developmentally delayed people. All I have to say is, tell your parents I feel bad for them.

[QUOTE="rexxpro"]

1. the single player campaign is way too short. $100 for a game that only takes 5 hours to complete is pathetic. $20 per hour is a joke. a cheap hooker costs less than that.

MattRushmore

If you paid $100 for COD4, you deserve..........., wait, I cannot let myself pick on developmentally delayed people. All I have to say is, tell your parents I feel bad for them.

yeah, i was like wtf, who spends $100 on a game, when you can go to a store and pay $60 or less for it

the one thing I hate about COD is the fact that if a host quits for any reason, the game ends and will count as a loss

killerfist

That's going to be fixed in the upcoming patch. No date on when exactly it's being released though.

i dont really hate anything about cod4

but yea, being killed by a totally random grenade throw always sucks

actually, i take back what i said. i HATE martyrdom. i barely ever kills me, but its still blows when it does. and if i use it, i always feel cheap when i kill someone with it

what i hate about COD4, is it's success.

that game blows in comparison to so many others...