Fable II was awesome so what do you think Fable III will be like?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I am also pumped for it. The original Fable was hands down the better of the two. Fable II was a letdown in my opinion.
I thought Fable II was really well done. There was more of a world to explore but some of the side missions could of been better. There is some talk that you can take your character from Fable II into Fable III, true?
No idea however, It wouldn't make sense considering it's set 500 years after the last fable.I thought Fable II was really well done. There was more of a world to explore but some of the side missions could of been better. There is some talk that you can take your character from Fable II into Fable III, true?
rpg_addition
The only things I hated was:
Guns instead of bows.
That bloody dog.
Not enough monsters/enemies.
The start.
That plus it was childish and felt more like an action-adventure game with RPG-like elements instead of being a true RPG. Other than that I suppose it was a fantastic game...lol!The only things I hated was:
Guns instead of bows.
That bloody dog.
Not enough monsters/enemies.
The start.
rpg_addition
The second one was pretty good so i hope they dont stray to far from the formula. The combat was a little bit stale but all in all a great game. I dont know about this episodic release though sounds fishy to me. Great franchise though.
I never played the 1st one but loved the 2nd one still play it from time to time even. The 3rd looks like its going to be great. Cant wait.
I'm looking forward to it...i really need a new RPG to play..just started my second playthrough of Dragon Age Origins..
[QUOTE="rpg_addition"]No idea however, It wouldn't make sense considering it's set 500 years after the last fable. No Fable 2 was 500 years after Fable 1, but Fable 3 is only 50 years after Fable 2.I thought Fable II was really well done. There was more of a world to explore but some of the side missions could of been better. There is some talk that you can take your character from Fable II into Fable III, true?
RaseshX
I loved Fable II. I put countless hours into that game... until I had finished and owned pretty much everything. The only thing I didn't like was that it auto-saved after I drank the gender-change potion at the end (just to see what it would look like) and then was stuck as a female.
The E3 vid for Fable III didn't really show too much that looked exciting, but I'm still looking forward to the game.
[QUOTE="RaseshX"][QUOTE="rpg_addition"]
I thought Fable II was really well done. There was more of a world to explore but some of the side missions could of been better. There is some talk that you can take your character from Fable II into Fable III, true?
No idea however, It wouldn't make sense considering it's set 500 years after the last fable. No Fable 2 was 500 years after Fable 1, but Fable 3 is only 50 years after Fable 2. Regardless, it still wouldn't make sense.Does anyone know if Fable III will be longer than Fable II? I finished Fable II in a week. I blame multiple gaming benders over the course of that week. I'm doing all the quests I didn't get around to doing while playing the main part of the game.
I am so pumped for Fable 3 Im sure they are gonna work out alot of the kinks that were in Fable 2 that didn't make it as good as fable 1. But Fable 3 I believe will be alot better than Fable 2.
lol... Anyone agreeing with me that it was good?
rpg_addition
I don't know why so many people hate on it here, but everyone I know loves it. I think it expanded and fixed most of the annoying parts of the original and adds plenty more interesting things. I think Fable 3 will be much further expanded and I can't wait to see the end results.
[QUOTE="gears90"]No Fable 2 was 500 years after Fable 1, but Fable 3 is only 50 years after Fable 2. Regardless, it still wouldn't make sense.[QUOTE="RaseshX"] No idea however, It wouldn't make sense considering it's set 500 years after the last fable.RaseshX
From my understanding(based on the E3 trailer) your hero from Fable 2, now the king, is the person who is handing the kingdom and life of adventure over to the children, what's the problem of 50 years later? 10 years from the start and then 10 years in the spire plus whatever age the hero was at the start plus the 50 is still within a normal human life span.
[QUOTE="RaseshX"][QUOTE="gears90"] No Fable 2 was 500 years after Fable 1, but Fable 3 is only 50 years after Fable 2.
Regardless, it still wouldn't make sense.From my understanding(based on the E3 trailer) your hero from Fable 2, now the king, is the person who is handing the kingdom and life of adventure over to the children, what's the problem of 50 years later? 10 years from the start and then 10 years in the spire plus whatever age the hero was at the start plus the 50 is still within a normal human life span.
On the E3 trailer doesn't it show that the previous king died & he's left the crown to his sons? Also on the trailer, the character looks very young (in his 20's), assuming your hero is in his 80's, it doesn't make sense to be him. What would make sense is if your hero was the previous king who recently died and left the crown to one of his sons. I don't know if you saw a different trailer or something but that's what I recall from the E3 event.Fable 2 was a really shallow RPG, very little customization and your choices were pointless. (marriage, ownign property)
So no, Peter Molyneux talks such a huge game but he is a total dope. I hope Fable 3 flops. If its good, thats great, if not, I hope it fails hard.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment