Are games starting to lack a certain something?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for madgrezz
madgrezz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 madgrezz
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts
Dont get me wrong todays games are amazing but to me it feels that games are losing there replay value so much quicker then they used to, I meen i have a fair few games for my xbox360 and pc yet quite often find myself with nothing to play. Maybe all these crazy graphics are being used to compensate for lack of gameplay and fresh idea's...maybe are they lacking that certain something or maybe i just expect more then i used to. whats your opinion?
Avatar image for senecaboyer88
senecaboyer88

3386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 senecaboyer88
Member since 2005 • 3386 Posts
i agree....i have all these games.....but i never feel like playing them after like my 3rd time...... i get really bored with games really fast....only game that ever kept my interest for more than a month was socom 2....that was the only game i ever played before 360 came out..
Avatar image for 76ers
76ers

4747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 76ers
Member since 2005 • 4747 Posts
Dont get me wrong todays games are amazing but to me it feels that games are losing there replay value so much quicker then they used to, I meen i have a fair few games for my xbox360 and pc yet quite often find myself with nothing to play. Maybe all these crazy graphics are being used to compensate for lack of gameplay and fresh idea's...maybe are they lacking that certain something or maybe i just expect more then i used to. whats your opinion?madgrezz
I agree in some ways. But, next generation is still getting started... Who knows what we will see.
Avatar image for DWNSHFT
DWNSHFT

4735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 DWNSHFT
Member since 2004 • 4735 Posts
I have to agree. It seems like alot of the games I play recently have zero replay value. i do like what Microsoft has done with the achievements . I tend to replay a game more often or spend a little more time with it to unlock them.
Avatar image for F4ll3n_1
F4ll3n_1

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 F4ll3n_1
Member since 2005 • 1263 Posts

I can certainly name a few:

1) Longevity: What happened to the 80 hour epics? Even the standard JRPG is down to 40/50 hrs now.

2) Originality: Luckily, this is coming back thanks to the showing of games such as Mass Effect, Bioshock and Assassins Creed. Though I hoped to expect more from the Next-Gen controllers and stuff, rather than sticking to the standard configuration weve had for 2 gens now.

3) Soundtrack: "wtf is he on about?!" you're thinking. Well, I believe soundtracks in games have declined, games such as FF7 and 8 had some fantastic, energetic music for things like boss battles, as did suikoden 2. Music in games now tends to be more ambient than active.

Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts
I think that the main problem is that we all have Attention Deficit Disorder and cannot stay interested in a game for very long.
Avatar image for F4ll3n_1
F4ll3n_1

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 F4ll3n_1
Member since 2005 • 1263 Posts

I think that the main problem is that we all have Attention Deficit Disorder and cannot stay interested in a game for very long.Large_Soda

Thats one solution :p and its probably right, but, no doubt, nobody will stay interested enough to find out. Im not usually into blaming media for anything, but maybe TV adverts have some blame here, as soon as the adverts come on, what happens? You flick to something else. All I wanna do is watch my sodding program start to finish, you can have the adverts BETWEEN PROGRAMS not between parts! Maybe thats the reason we can't stay focussed on anything, adverts pee us off too much :D

Avatar image for wreak
wreak

4645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 wreak
Member since 2005 • 4645 Posts
i don't think there lsong there replay value because it all depends on the person, and if ther person says "i'm not gonna buy a game caus SP is worthless w/out MP" then thats there problem.
one thing games are losing is imagination, and originality.
Avatar image for wreak
wreak

4645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 wreak
Member since 2005 • 4645 Posts

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"]I think that the main problem is that we all have Attention Deficit Disorder and cannot stay interested in a game for very long.F4ll3n_1

Thats one solution :p and its probably right, but, no doubt, nobody will stay interested enough to find out. Im not usually into blaming media for anything, but maybe TV adverts have some blame here, as soon as the adverts come on, what happens? You flick to something else. All I wanna do is watch my sodding program start to finish, you can have the adverts BETWEEN PROGRAMS not between parts! Maybe thats the reason we can't stay focussed on anything, adverts pee us off too much :D



actually thats how TV works in alot of europe and japan. just program, and then like 10 mins of comercials at the end, it's pretty sweet, caus 10 mins is like the perfect amount of time to go to the store, or make a snack inbetween shows.
Avatar image for Generic_Dude
Generic_Dude

11707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Generic_Dude
Member since 2006 • 11707 Posts

It's hard to say... when you think about games back in the NES days, they've got a lot of replay value (most of them anyway), but they were designed that way. Games were more arcade-centric and replaying them over and over ensured steady cash flow. Now, steady cash flow is insured by shelving a game and moving onto a new one. But really, part of what removes the replay value is that the games aren't simple anymore... simple gameplay lends itself well to multiple playthroughs.

But who knows? I mean, I've played through the original Legend Of Zelda about 100 times. I played through Wind Waker once. For all you people who played through Contra a million times, how many times did you play through one of it's more recent installments? It's not like the gameplay of these games has changed dramatically, so maybe the change is in us.

Avatar image for F4ll3n_1
F4ll3n_1

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 F4ll3n_1
Member since 2005 • 1263 Posts
[QUOTE="F4ll3n_1"]

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"]I think that the main problem is that we all have Attention Deficit Disorder and cannot stay interested in a game for very long.wreak

Thats one solution :p and its probably right, but, no doubt, nobody will stay interested enough to find out. Im not usually into blaming media for anything, but maybe TV adverts have some blame here, as soon as the adverts come on, what happens? You flick to something else. All I wanna do is watch my sodding program start to finish, you can have the adverts BETWEEN PROGRAMS not between parts! Maybe thats the reason we can't stay focussed on anything, adverts pee us off too much :D



actually thats how TV works in alot of europe and japan. just program, and then like 10 mins of comercials at the end, it's pretty sweet, caus 10 mins is like the perfect amount of time to go to the store, or make a snack inbetween shows.

The BBC channels in the UK work like that as well, in fact, they hardly have any adverts at all, but theyre like the biggest TV company in Britain. Sky 1/2/3 are the worst I think, they play 5 minutes of program, have 5 minutes of adverts, then play 50 minutes of program, then have 10 minutes of commercials and then play the last measly five minutes of program....then more adverts till the next program.

Avatar image for DesmondPills
DesmondPills

1153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 DesmondPills
Member since 2005 • 1153 Posts
good topic.  i was just thinking about this today when i looked at the 3 games i currently own for 360 versus the 15+ i own for xbox.  i dont have ADD either lol!  ive traded in so many 360 games not because they are bad by any means, its just they dont have a long term replay factor for me.  some good games are on the horizon that hopefully will bring back that replay value to the system.  some 360 games do have great replay value but i personally find them harder right now to come by.  all in due time.
Avatar image for Aaron89
Aaron89

3377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Aaron89
Member since 2003 • 3377 Posts
I definitely agree - though I haven't really thought about it. Behind the shiny graphics and "next-gen" gameplay - something is severely missing.

Total Hours with Oblivion: 60

Total Hours with Mario Bros. 3: 200+
Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts

It's hard to say... when you think about games back in the NES days, they've got a lot of replay value (most of them anyway), but they were designed that way. Games were more arcade-centric and replaying them over and over ensured steady cash flow. Now, steady cash flow is insured by shelving a game and moving onto a new one. But really, part of what removes the replay value is that the games aren't simple anymore... simple gameplay lends itself well to multiple playthroughs.

But who knows? I mean, I've played through the original Legend Of Zelda about 100 times. I played through Wind Waker once. For all you people who played through Contra a million times, how many times did you play through one of it's more recent installments? It's not like the gameplay of these games has changed dramatically, so maybe the change is in us.

Generic_Dude
You know what I really think it is? And this may be limited to NES and SNES "aged" players, but when I was a kid renting games didn't really exist and buying a game took a lot of strong arming on my part towards my parents, and I usually ended up getting a game for my birthday and Christmas. Now I can buy whatever game I want, whenever I want and based on the fact that we all have A.D.D I can stop playing and then go on the computer and surf the net, watch a movie, do whatever. We only really played the hell out of older games cause a lot of us had no choice.
Avatar image for Flaming_Ape
Flaming_Ape

3246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Flaming_Ape
Member since 2007 • 3246 Posts
The certain something they're lacking...is long single-player campaigns, it really pisses me off when developers are too lazy to make decent-length campaigns for games, personally I think campaign is the best part and developers use online play as an excuse for not making long single player campaigns.
Avatar image for lukasz_erecinsk
lukasz_erecinsk

1235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 lukasz_erecinsk
Member since 2004 • 1235 Posts
To an extent I do agree. But there are still games that come out these days that keep me pinned in front of the TV for hrs, ie: Oblivion
Avatar image for V_Zarnold_N
V_Zarnold_N

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 V_Zarnold_N
Member since 2006 • 1272 Posts
Dont get me wrong todays games are amazing but to me it feels that games are losing there replay value so much quicker then they used to, I meen i have a fair few games for my xbox360 and pc yet quite often find myself with nothing to play. Maybe all these crazy graphics are being used to compensate for lack of gameplay and fresh idea's...maybe are they lacking that certain something or maybe i just expect more then i used to. whats your opinion?madgrezz
well that and most have a saving feature... i replayed super mario bros. 3 when i was younger like 1000 times because i had to replay it everytime to get back to where i stopped
Avatar image for rulo_rezn0r
rulo_rezn0r

1351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 rulo_rezn0r
Member since 2006 • 1351 Posts

I can certainly name a few:

1) Longevity: What happened to the 80 hour epics? Even the standard JRPG is down to 40/50 hrs now.

2) Originality: Luckily, this is coming back thanks to the showing of games such as Mass Effect, Bioshock and Assassins Creed. Though I hoped to expect more from the Next-Gen controllers and stuff, rather than sticking to the standard configuration weve had for 2 gens now.

3) Soundtrack: "wtf is he on about?!" you're thinking. Well, I believe soundtracks in games have declined, games such as FF7 and 8 had some fantastic, energetic music for things like boss battles, as did suikoden 2. Music in games now tends to be more ambient than active.

F4ll3n_1

Wait for blue dragon my friend :)

Avatar image for sophospeare
sophospeare

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 sophospeare
Member since 2003 • 443 Posts

It's hard to say... when you think about games back in the NES days, they've got a lot of replay value (most of them anyway), but they were designed that way. Games were more arcade-centric and replaying them over and over ensured steady cash flow. Now, steady cash flow is insured by shelving a game and moving onto a new one. But really, part of what removes the replay value is that the games aren't simple anymore... simple gameplay lends itself well to multiple playthroughs.

But who knows? I mean, I've played through the original Legend Of Zelda about 100 times. I played through Wind Waker once. For all you people who played through Contra a million times, how many times did you play through one of it's more recent installments? It's not like the gameplay of these games has changed dramatically, so maybe the change is in us.

Generic_Dude
One thing you have to keep in mind is the fact that games today take a bit longer to beat than the games of old. I've seen people go through original Zelda speed runs in less than 1/2 an hour. Super Mario brothers can be beaten in less than 15 minutes. Even Gears of War, which has a relatively short single player campaign, takes 10 hours to beat. Sure, the old gen had games like Final Fantasy, but they can't compare with the length of an Oblivion game. Are games getting old quicker than they were...probably...but it's because back then all games were new and new genres were popping up all the time. When's the last genre you've seen pop up? You can only do so much with a shooter, RPG or platformer and since games are relatively similar, you get bored quicker. Innovation is much harder now than before, but there's still a lot of room for developers to go as long as they don't drag their collective feet.
Avatar image for V_Zarnold_N
V_Zarnold_N

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 V_Zarnold_N
Member since 2006 • 1272 Posts
[QUOTE="Generic_Dude"]

It's hard to say... when you think about games back in the NES days, they've got a lot of replay value (most of them anyway), but they were designed that way. Games were more arcade-centric and replaying them over and over ensured steady cash flow. Now, steady cash flow is insured by shelving a game and moving onto a new one. But really, part of what removes the replay value is that the games aren't simple anymore... simple gameplay lends itself well to multiple playthroughs.

But who knows? I mean, I've played through the original Legend Of Zelda about 100 times. I played through Wind Waker once. For all you people who played through Contra a million times, how many times did you play through one of it's more recent installments? It's not like the gameplay of these games has changed dramatically, so maybe the change is in us.

sophospeare
One thing you have to keep in mind is the fact that games today take a bit longer to beat than the games of old. I've seen people go through original Zelda speed runs in less than 1/2 an hour. Super Mario brothers can be beaten in less than 15 minutes. Even Gears of War, which has a relatively short single player campaign, takes 10 hours to beat. Sure, the old gen had games like Final Fantasy, but they can't compare with the length of an Oblivion game. Are games getting old quicker than they were...probably...but it's because back then all games were new and new genres were popping up all the time. When's the last genre you've seen pop up? You can only do so much with a shooter, RPG or platformer and since games are relatively similar, you get bored quicker. Innovation is much harder now than before, but there's still a lot of room for developers to go as long as they don't drag their collective feet.

AMEN!!!!!!!!!
Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#21 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts

There are three things you need to take note to...

1. You are getting older. Not everyone will play video games for to long in their lives...

2. There are too many games today, so instead of getting totally awsome games every few months (to enjoy for a long time), we get tons of games in half the time that are half effort and not as good as they can be...

3. You spend too much time gathering information on video games. Info from places such as this place, magazines, and other sources. So, you will know too much about the game by the time its released, so you won't be as surprise or thrilled as you owuld be if you didn't gather all that info. I stopped reading so much info a while back because its ruinning my gaming experience.

PS: Heres one of the most important factors that I see that would help ruin an experience. That my friends is... HYPE!

Thats why I don't hype games and tell others to do the same, but I guess ownage is just as addicting as drugs for some people.

Avatar image for madskills6117
madskills6117

4172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 madskills6117
Member since 2006 • 4172 Posts
I think devs are putting to much focus on MP and not enough focus on SP. It's only but so many different ways we can fight on 8 maps with no story behind it. Whereas, in SP devs should take advantage of the opportunity to tell some type of a story. The problem with that is most young gamers these days just want to shoot each other. Very rarely do they want to actually think and this ultimately leads to repetive gameplay.
Avatar image for SicsStringFreak
SicsStringFreak

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SicsStringFreak
Member since 2003 • 1679 Posts

I can certainly name a few:

1) Longevity: What happened to the 80 hour epics? Even the standard JRPG is down to 40/50 hrs now.

2) Originality: Luckily, this is coming back thanks to the showing of games such as Mass Effect, Bioshock and Assassins Creed. Though I hoped to expect more from the Next-Gen controllers and stuff, rather than sticking to the standard configuration weve had for 2 gens now.

3) Soundtrack: "wtf is he on about?!" you're thinking. Well, I believe soundtracks in games have declined, games such as FF7 and 8 had some fantastic, energetic music for things like boss battles, as did suikoden 2. Music in games now tends to be more ambient than active.

F4ll3n_1
parasite eve had one of the best gamming soundtracks of all time, along with the C&C and red alert games, and diablo. quake2 and 3, duke nukem. should i go on. now its like its just there. not adding to the mood or the suspense of the games. like someone said oh hey i like this track and threw the crap in there. not adding to the emotion created by music, see music is the language of emotion. everyone understands it in some form. but no one can translate it rightfully. accept the composer. and as a musician some games are losing emotional music, but games like halo and halo2 had a great mood and setting for the game. the music i mean. but gears could of done better on the music, but it had some good points in it musically. but it did add to the mood of the game. hell one of the reasons im so hyped about C&C3 is the music in it.
Avatar image for Dogmatic923
Dogmatic923

734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dogmatic923
Member since 2006 • 734 Posts
Dont get me wrong todays games are amazing but to me it feels that games are losing there replay value so much quicker then they used to, I meen i have a fair few games for my xbox360 and pc yet quite often find myself with nothing to play. Maybe all these crazy graphics are being used to compensate for lack of gameplay and fresh idea's...maybe are they lacking that certain something or maybe i just expect more then i used to. whats your opinion?madgrezz
I think we have to look back in history to anwer this question. Remember when Mario Bros came out when we were kids (speaking to the oldre 20s crowd) and although to todays standards it would be considered a joke, it was amazing and you could play it over and over again. Same goes with the rest of the games thereafter. I think in our day in age that we have been so saturated with so many great games over a long period of time that it has lost that uniqeness and first time feelings that we got from games when we were kids. Exciment only goes so far. Look at the movie industry today. They don't make as much as they used to. People have come accustem to big explosion twisting story lines that it doesn't do the same thing it did for them bf. Like Terminatior 2. I was in awe of that movie now the speical effects are cheap in comparison to the effects today but the effects today don't have the same impact on you as it did when you first watched T2. I think gaming has come of age where it not going to blow your mind for long periods of time. I remeber when i first saw COD2 at gamestop i wsa blown away by its graphics, now it seems normal. I don't think anything can keep pace with our nature to want to be dazzled with something new.
Avatar image for SicsStringFreak
SicsStringFreak

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SicsStringFreak
Member since 2003 • 1679 Posts

There are three things you need to take note to...

1. You are getting older. Not everyone will play video games for to long in their lives...

2. There are too many games today, so instead of getting totally awsome games every few months (to enjoy for a long time), we get tons of games in half the time that are half effort and not as good as they can be...

3. You spend too much time gathering information on video games. Info from places such as this place, magazines, and other sources. So, you will know too much about the game by the time its released, so you won't be as surprise or thrilled as you owuld be if you didn't gather all that info. I stopped reading so much info a while back because its ruinning my gaming experience.

PS: Heres one of the most important factors that I see that would help ruin an experience. That my friends is... HYPE!

Thats why I don't hype games and tell others to do the same, but I guess ownage is just as addicting as drugs for some people.

Cedmln
you do make interesting points. and i can agree mostly with you on that. mine isnt getting ruined, its just actively changing, being morphed, but as am i. so really. could it just be all in the games, or could a lot of it have to to with me and my perceptions. ( i know the answers ) ( they keep whispering to me) ( its madness )
Avatar image for jason1690
jason1690

970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 jason1690
Member since 2004 • 970 Posts
length
Avatar image for giraffepancakes
giraffepancakes

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 giraffepancakes
Member since 2005 • 248 Posts
Halo 2 and Gears of War. I played these two for probably a million hours total. I'd say they have some good replay value. Also Counter-Strike is quite popular almost 10 years after its release. I just best Resident Evil 4 for the 5th time the other day. An Metroid Prime was still fun the 7th time around. 
Avatar image for madgrezz
madgrezz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 madgrezz
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

Hey people its good to see such a response to my post and i agree with aot of the things said, me im from the days of snes and megadrive i cant remember how many times i played sonic the hedgehog and mario but i know its was alot.. a hell of alot actually, but i meen sonic games now suck in my opinion theve lost what they used to be there 16mb graphics and midi sound lol but serousily there was just something that used to keep me captivated in them.