Are You All as Mad As Me About This?

I am not a troll, I own a 360 and I dont own a PS3. Click on my profile and look at my reviewed games if you dont believe me. Before I bought my 360 three years ago, I weighed both possible options between PS3 and 360. I went with 360 under the idea of they are going to have more of the games that I like exclusive. For the most part I have been correct about that for myself. However, the way microsoft seems to nickel and dime the consumer constantly is really getting under my skin. There are many issues I could talk about right now but I dont want to start getting into them. I dont wont to be here writing this message for that long. I will just summarize some of my problems with a few words, among them being RED RINGS, and overpriced downloadable content. Though these things truly annoyed me, they are not the complaint I have today.

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world. On the other hand, the PS3 titles are supporting 32 players in titles that even came out for both 360 and pS3. So we are paying more for live, and we are getting less players. If we pay more, arent we suppossed to get better? Isnt that how the world works? I might understand a little bit more if we had 16 players as the max number of players but lag was NEVER a problem. Unfortunately this is not so, lag does occur from time to time, on all games. More often then me paying 50 bucks a year would like. When next generation comes, it is going to be hard for me to go with microsoft again. I think they really need to change their business philosophy with the 360, absolutly no respect for the consumer. They short change and gimmick you every chance they get.

I think thah microsoft have good exclusives, like the lost and damned, and they have good exclusive games too, like all the games of halo, gears of war, fable...

the xbox live service, well i like it; but certainly we pay 50 bucks a year, and we have some cool stuff, but sony get also good stuff like ps home, and they get it for free.

and obviusly we should get more that 16 players playing, and a lot of less lag.

i mean, i like xbox live a lot, but sony gets a simmilar service for free, we should get much more;)

I am not a troll, I own a 360 and I dont own a PS3. Click on my profile and look at my reviewed games if you dont believe me. Before I bought my 360 three years ago, I weighed both possible options between PS3 and 360. I went with 360 under the idea of they are going to have more of the games that I like exclusive. For the most part I have been correct about that for myself. However, the way microsoft seems to nickel and dime the consumer constantly is really getting under my skin. There are many issues I could talk about right now but I dont want to start getting into them. I dont wont to be here writing this message for that long. I will just summarize some of my problems with a few words, among them being RED RINGS, and overpriced downloadable content. Though these things truly annoyed me, they are not the complaint I have today.

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world. On the other hand, the PS3 titles are supporting 32 players in titles that even came out for both 360 and pS3. So we are paying more for live, and we are getting less players. If we pay more, arent we suppossed to get better? Isnt that how the world works? I might understand a little bit more if we had 16 players as the max number of players but lag was NEVER a problem. Unfortunately this is not so, lag does occur from time to time, on all games. More often then me paying 50 bucks a year would like. When next generation comes, it is going to be hard for me to go with microsoft again. I think they really need to change their business philosophy with the 360, absolutly no respect for the consumer. They short change and gimmick you every chance they get.

Camper_On_Creat

there is no need to bring religion into this thread, it's best to leave it out...and who cares if we have less players for certain games....does it really bother you that much?...and this really seems to belong in a blog...sounds like you should pick a different hobby if you don't understand the fact that companies love money, just like us humans....and will charge for something if they know they will make money

[QUOTE="Camper_On_Creat"]

there is no need to bring religion into this thread, it's best to leave it out...OfficialBed

Thank you!

I am not a troll, I own a 360 and I dont own a PS3. Click on my profile and look at my reviewed games if you dont believe me. Before I bought my 360 three years ago, I weighed both possible options between PS3 and 360. I went with 360 under the idea of they are going to have more of the games that I like exclusive. For the most part I have been correct about that for myself. However, the way microsoft seems to nickel and dime the consumer constantly is really getting under my skin. There are many issues I could talk about right now but I dont want to start getting into them. I dont wont to be here writing this message for that long. I will just summarize some of my problems with a few words, among them being RED RINGS, and overpriced downloadable content. Though these things truly annoyed me, they are not the complaint I have today.

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world. On the other hand, the PS3 titles are supporting 32 players in titles that even came out for both 360 and pS3. So we are paying more for live, and we are getting less players. If we pay more, arent we suppossed to get better? Isnt that how the world works? I might understand a little bit more if we had 16 players as the max number of players but lag was NEVER a problem. Unfortunately this is not so, lag does occur from time to time, on all games. More often then me paying 50 bucks a year would like. When next generation comes, it is going to be hard for me to go with microsoft again. I think they really need to change their business philosophy with the 360, absolutly no respect for the consumer. They short change and gimmick you every chance they get.

Thank you!rattleheadxyz

you're welcome lol...but you quoted me funny....it looks like "Camper_On_Creat" said that :P

okay. two things about this . a 32 player match , no matter what console or what internet has lag . alot too.

and two , even if PS3 online was better what games would you be able to play on it?and i mean besides call of duty and all that stuff.

also lag has nothing to do with xbox live...its your crappy internet that is causing it to lagdeadbeat2381

[QUOTE="Camper_On_Creat"]

I am not a troll, I own a 360 and I dont own a PS3. Click on my profile and look at my reviewed games if you dont believe me. Before I bought my 360 three years ago, I weighed both possible options between PS3 and 360. I went with 360 under the idea of they are going to have more of the games that I like exclusive. For the most part I have been correct about that for myself. However, the way microsoft seems to nickel and dime the consumer constantly is really getting under my skin. There are many issues I could talk about right now but I dont want to start getting into them. I dont wont to be here writing this message for that long. I will just summarize some of my problems with a few words, among them being RED RINGS, and overpriced downloadable content. Though these things truly annoyed me, they are not the complaint I have today.

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world. On the other hand, the PS3 titles are supporting 32 players in titles that even came out for both 360 and pS3. So we are paying more for live, and we are getting less players. If we pay more, arent we suppossed to get better? Isnt that how the world works? I might understand a little bit more if we had 16 players as the max number of players but lag was NEVER a problem. Unfortunately this is not so, lag does occur from time to time, on all games. More often then me paying 50 bucks a year would like. When next generation comes, it is going to be hard for me to go with microsoft again. I think they really need to change their business philosophy with the 360, absolutly no respect for the consumer. They short change and gimmick you every chance they get.

xSHADOWxBLADEx3

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world.

Camper_On_Creat

Who else lol'd?

[QUOTE="Camper_On_Creat"]

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world.

Murj

Who else lol'd?

Me.

I am not a troll, I own a 360 and I dont own a PS3. Click on my profile and look at my reviewed games if you dont believe me. Before I bought my 360 three years ago, I weighed both possible options between PS3 and 360. I went with 360 under the idea of they are going to have more of the games that I like exclusive. For the most part I have been correct about that for myself. However, the way microsoft seems to nickel and dime the consumer constantly is really getting under my skin. There are many issues I could talk about right now but I dont want to start getting into them. I dont wont to be here writing this message for that long. I will just summarize some of my problems with a few words, among them being RED RINGS, and overpriced downloadable content. Though these things truly annoyed me, they are not the complaint I have today.

We pay 50 bucks a year for live, and xbox lived is suppossed to be the best thing to ever happen to video games, kind of like what Jesus did for the world. On the other hand, the PS3 titles are supporting 32 players in titles that even came out for both 360 and pS3. So we are paying more for live, and we are getting less players. If we pay more, arent we suppossed to get better? Isnt that how the world works? I might understand a little bit more if we had 16 players as the max number of players but lag was NEVER a problem. Unfortunately this is not so, lag does occur from time to time, on all games. More often then me paying 50 bucks a year would like. When next generation comes, it is going to be hard for me to go with microsoft again. I think they really need to change their business philosophy with the 360, absolutly no respect for the consumer. They short change and gimmick you every chance they get.