BF3 v MW3, Help!

both pretty good

BF3 looks better and has a slower pace to it, and if you dont have the quickest of reflexs u can still be good at it (capture objectives, heal, revive, fix vehicles, etc), but its more similar to BF:bc2 then id like. has vehicles

while MW3 has a more polished and quick multiplayer and has many more co-op options, but even if ur leet, urll prolly get ur arse handed to ya many times, no vehicles, and while the foundation hasnt changed the gameplay has been tweeked alot and for the better imo

that's an easy one.

get mw3 you won't be dissapointed.

bf3 is a slower pace shooter, big maps tanks helies. There are classes that do different roles that don't get everything as the other class. and cod is arcade shooter, I like bf3 but just for me i prefer running and gunning, up close and personal, SO there for i sometimes have more fun with a cod game because there is always someone right there in your face to kill.

Since you can only get one. If you like bigger maps then cod, tanks/ helis, class roles. GET bf3, if you like upclose, fast, arcade shooter then cod.

Etheir way i don't think you can lose. WIN/WIN both great games

I like both games and I have both. As far as campaign goes, BF3 delivers a more intense and realistic war experience while MW3 has a better story (especially if you've played and beaten MW and MW2 and want to continue the story). As for multiplayer, I prefer BF3.

Finally, for graphics, MW3 uses the same engine as MW1 and MW2, so it's a little stale, but at least it's stable. BF3 has terrible screen tearing and pop-in issues.

Both are fun but BF3 is the better game.

Both are fun but BF3 is the better game.

slantedandencha

Truth^

[QUOTE="slantedandencha"]

Both are fun but BF3 is the better game.

Blueresident87

Truth^

double truth ^^

Stick to what you know if you like COD get that if your a Bf fan get that. Their both good for their respective audience but better kept separate for communities sake.

Played some MW3 and really wasn't into it, all I could muster up is "Its better then B.O.But TBH I haven't liked COD since part 4...
Also I believe Bf does a few things better like sound design (which isn't even opinion) to weapon characteristics and variety of gameplay.

If you don't have a computer capable of playing BF3 then I would highly suggest you don't get it. BF3 is garbage on consoles. The maps are smaller, only 24 players (as opposed to 64 on PC), and the game isn't as smooth, so I would suggest getting MW3 for the 360 over BF3. Just my 2 scents.

[QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

[QUOTE="slantedandencha"]

Both are fun but BF3 is the better game.

adders99

Truth^

double truth ^^

If you don't have a computer capable of playing BF3 then I would highly suggest you don't get it. BF3 is garbage on consoles. The maps are smaller, only 24 players (as opposed to 64 on PC), and the game isn't as smooth, so I would suggest getting MW3 for the 360 over BF3. Just my 2 scents.

drb1992