BF3>any CoD

If you have not come to realize this then you sir have not discovered the absolute fun that is had in a team based online FPS/war game. However, if you trying to play BF3 like you do CoD then you'll hate it. However, when you find a good squad and play agaisnt good squads you'll never be able to put this game down. How can this fact be denied? Please enlighten me. BTW i've owned every CoD up to BOps. Lets keep this civil.

This is going to blow up

IMO, BF3 has a more realistic war experience and sound, while COD has better storyline and graphics.

kane and lynch >>>>>>> break>>>> rent a server

I quit that game once that game . i have yet to look back. YET i find my self going back to cod...

This has me weak. I guess there are no such things as opinions anymore.

It's an ok game, if they got rid of the class based gameplay and the retarded spawn system it would be better.

IMO, BF3 has a more realistic war experience and sound, while COD has better storyline and graphics.

MathMattS

BF3 is a lot of fun, but only with friends, CoD can be played alone or with friends in about equal joy.

I'd say BF3 is better then the current CoD games, but early CoD easily destroys early Battlefield

I enjoy COD's co-op modes and campaigns more than any Battlefield 3.

And Battlefield 3 looks better than MW3, but MW3 is still a fine looking game.

I think it realy depends on what you like. If you like vehicle and team work then BF games are what you're looking to play. If you just want to run around shooting people and pat yourself on the back for a awesome K/D ratio then COD games are for you..

There are so many things people do not understand about either shooter.

For example, CoD has p2p host. Meaning one person in every game gets a MASSIVE advantage over ever other player, I'd say at least half a second (which is massive).

I could talk about BF3 all day I'm sure, but BF3 is like the call of duty version of chess. If you play competitively/professionally you know what I'm talking about. There are so many interesting factors that come into play. And that is as much of a compliment as it is a complaint.

Some matches, I can determine whether my team wins or loses by running around on the ground. Other times, it completely depends on the air, or the armour.

Its an interesting game to play, and it challenges your reflexes as much as it challenges your brain.

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

There are so many things people do not understand about either shooter.

For example, CoD has p2p host. Meaning one person in every game gets a MASSIVE advantage over ever other player, I'd say at least half a second (which is massive).

I could talk about BF3 all day I'm sure, but BF3 is like the call of duty version of chess. If you play competitively/professionally you know what I'm talking about. There are so many interesting factors that come into play. And that is as much of a compliment as it is a complaint.

Some matches, I can determine whether my team wins or loses by running around on the ground. Other times, it completely depends on the air, or the armour.

Its an interesting game to play, and it challenges your reflexes as much as it challenges your brain.

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

CondorCalabasas

First of all, just because someone prefers COD over BF doesn't mean they're atrocious at FPS's or haven't played Battlefield. People have different preferences, and because someone prefers one game over the other doesn't mean they are inferior to the players of the other game.

Secondly, why do people always pretend like camping only happens in COD games? Camping is a part of almost all multiplayer shooters, and BF3 is certainly no exception to this rule. Snipers who sit back the entire game and don't bother playing the objective in BF3 are just as annoying as any camper in COD, if not more so.

If you enjoy BF3 more, fine, everyone has their preferences and I can respect that. But it's elitist bull**** like this post you just made that needs to end.

COD > BF3 ......BF3 has become a COD clone, it lost every thing that BF is now gone

[QUOTE="CondorCalabasas"]

There are so many things people do not understand about either shooter.

For example, CoD has p2p host. Meaning one person in every game gets a MASSIVE advantage over ever other player, I'd say at least half a second (which is massive).

I could talk about BF3 all day I'm sure, but BF3 is like the call of duty version of chess. If you play competitively/professionally you know what I'm talking about. There are so many interesting factors that come into play. And that is as much of a compliment as it is a complaint.

Some matches, I can determine whether my team wins or loses by running around on the ground. Other times, it completely depends on the air, or the armour.

Its an interesting game to play, and it challenges your reflexes as much as it challenges your brain.

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

Vari3ty

First of all, just because someone prefers COD over BF doesn't mean they're atrocious at FPS's or haven't played Battlefield. People have different preferences, and because someone prefers one game over the other doesn't mean they are inferior to the players of the other game.

Secondly, why do people always pretend like camping only happens in COD games? Camping is a part of almost all multiplayer shooters, and BF3 is certainly no exception to this rule. Snipers who sit back the entire game and don't bother playing the objective in BF3 are just as annoying as any camper in COD, if not more so.

If you enjoy BF3 more, fine, everyone has their preferences and I can respect that. But it's elitist bull**** like this post you just made that needs to end.

Yup another CoD-BF argument.

Yup another CoD-BF argument.

z50macdaddy

If you have not come to realize this then you sir have not discovered the absolute fun that is had in a team based online FPS/war game. However, if you trying to play BF3 like you do CoD then you'll hate it. However, when you find a good squad and play agaisnt good squads you'll never be able to put this game down. How can this fact be denied? Please enlighten me. BTW i've owned every CoD up to BOps. Lets keep this civil.

Trinitarian

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

CondorCalabasas

IMO, BF3 has a more realistic war experience and sound, while COD has better storyline and graphics.

MathMattS

any game>fps

[QUOTE="Trinitarian"]

If you have not come to realize this then you sir have not discovered the absolute fun that is had in a team based online FPS/war game. However, if you trying to play BF3 like you do CoD then you'll hate it. However, when you find a good squad and play agaisnt good squads you'll never be able to put this game down. How can this fact be denied? Please enlighten me. BTW i've owned every CoD up to BOps. Lets keep this civil.

dakan45

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

CondorCalabasas

I totally think it's reversed. We've all seen crosshairs show up beside the body of the player in COD. Sometimes I'm amazed I actually got a kill for such a bad shot. The hit marker actually shows up not on the person! lol It happens in both games...imo more on COD. Your shots you think are on target are not; probably because your holding the trigger too long and the recoil in BF is more than COD. Your gun is probably climbing, but you think your on target because your screen is blurry from suppressive fire. The game very much requires skill. Gun physics are more prevalent in BF.

[QUOTE="z50macdaddy"]

Yup another CoD-BF argument.

CondorCalabasas

[QUOTE="CondorCalabasas"]

[QUOTE="z50macdaddy"]

Yup another CoD-BF argument.

z50macdaddy

What I am saying is that Cod and BF argument are all pointless.z50macdaddy

[QUOTE="z50macdaddy"]What I am saying is that Cod and BF argument are all pointless.CondorCalabasas

There are so many things people do not understand about either shooter.

For example, CoD has p2p host. Meaning one person in every game gets a MASSIVE advantage over ever other player, I'd say at least half a second (which is massive).

I could talk about BF3 all day I'm sure, but BF3 is like the call of duty version of chess. If you play competitively/professionally you know what I'm talking about. There are so many interesting factors that come into play. And that is as much of a compliment as it is a complaint.

Some matches, I can determine whether my team wins or loses by running around on the ground. Other times, it completely depends on the air, or the armour.

Its an interesting game to play, and it challenges your reflexes as much as it challenges your brain.

To be completely honest, and I mean no disrespect here. But if someone tells me they like CoD over battlefield, I always assume that they either haven't played battlefield, or they are absolutely atrocious at FPS in general.

Like in BF3, is you are really bad at FPS, you are going to drop scores that very clearly represent that. If you equally talented, and you play Call of Duty, you can get any killstreak you could possibly imagine, you can just sit in a corner, and wait.

BF3, you get punched in the face for making a small mistake.

In CoD, you get a pat on the back for being terrible. (last stand, martrydom, auto-aim-hand-holding-one-hit-kill-weapons)

CondorCalabasas

thats not true at all, you should probably read up on the games before you try talking about them. COD has lag compensation, meaning nobody has an unfair advantage. If you do, it gives you artificial lag so your on par with the other players. Also, Battlefield 3 takes no skill with the retarded spawn system, all you have to do is get close to a bomb site or into a heavy traffic area and camp your ass off in a corner so your squad can spawn on you and overwelm the other team. With COD, you have to be constantly awair of your surrounding because an enemy could spawn anywhere. IMHO it's the exact opposite of what you say, In Battlefield you could go an entire match with only seeing 4 people so if you do bad at battlefield your just plain bad at FPS, and if your bad at FPS's your gonna do terrible in COD because its much more fast paced and unforgiving because your average life is like 45 seconds.

\]

thats not true at all, you should probably read up on the games before you try talking about them. COD has lag compensation, meaning nobody has an unfair advantage. If you do, it gives you artificial lag so your on par with the other players. Also, Battlefield 3 takes no skill with the retarded spawn system, all you have to do is get close to a bomb site or into a heavy traffic area and camp your ass off in a corner so your squad can spawn on you and overwelm the other team. With COD, you have to be constantly awair of your surrounding because an enemy could spawn anywhere. IMHO it's the exact opposite of what you say, In Battlefield you could go an entire match with only seeing 4 people so if you do bad at battlefield your just plain bad at FPS, and if your bad at FPS's your gonna do terrible in COD because its much more fast paced and unforgiving because your average life is like 45 seconds.

JayQproductions

those series may not be good anymore, but their both "fun" atleast, and they both were for a time, atleast until it became clear that the games was just ROCK, PAPER, SCISSORS now, in addition to doing their hardest to make elite players (talking about skill, not rank or unlocks) be on the same level as noobs.

i dont play either anymore, and i gave mw3 another shot, and again it let me down.

i only play fun and good games now

[QUOTE="JayQproductions"]\]

thats not true at all, you should probably read up on the games before you try talking about them. COD has lag compensation, meaning nobody has an unfair advantage. If you do, it gives you artificial lag so your on par with the other players. Also, Battlefield 3 takes no skill with the retarded spawn system, all you have to do is get close to a bomb site or into a heavy traffic area and camp your ass off in a corner so your squad can spawn on you and overwelm the other team. With COD, you have to be constantly awair of your surrounding because an enemy could spawn anywhere. IMHO it's the exact opposite of what you say, In Battlefield you could go an entire match with only seeing 4 people so if you do bad at battlefield your just plain bad at FPS, and if your bad at FPS's your gonna do terrible in COD because its much more fast paced and unforgiving because your average life is like 45 seconds.

CondorCalabasas

No, you spawn on your squad mates in BF3. One person from your squad camps and the rest of the squad just keeps respawning on him close to the objective and overwelming the other team. Also, good for you, you consider yourself a "hardcore game" and played professionally and competitively on both games, that just means you have no life, and your probably not even any good at the thing you've been wasting your life on because I've never heard of you......so you should probably find a new hobby. I've probably been playing games since before you where born so I dont go by the new age "hipster" talk of "core" and "casual" I play all types of video games because I enjoy them and like to have fun, not because I'm trying to become famous for playing a video game like you. And yes random spawns are better because like I said, you have to be constanatly awair of your surroundings. It takes more skill to defend from all angles versus knowing where your enemy is coming from.

Also, your just plain retarded if you think there is no such thing as artificial lag, it's been a huge debate lately with competitive games because more games are starting to input artificial lag so there is no host advantage. MW3 has openly said the last 2 patches for the game have been to tweak the lag compensation.

No, you spawn on your squad mates in BF3. One person from your squad camps and the rest of the squad just keeps respawning on him close to the objective and overwelming the other team. Also, good for you, you consider yourself a "hardcore game" and played professionally and competitively on both games, that just means you have no life, and your probably not even any good at the thing you've been wasting your life on because I've never heard of you......so you should probably find a new hobby. I've probably been playing games since before you where born so I dont go by the new age "hipster" talk of "core" and "casual" I play all types of video games because I enjoy them and like to have fun, not because I'm trying to become famous for playing a video game like you. And yes random spawns are better because like I said, you have to be constanatly awair of your surroundings. It takes more skill to defend from all angles versus knowing where your enemy is coming from.

JayQproductions

So because I make money playing video games, and you don't, that means I have no life? I'd think it would be the opposite.

Your attempt at a childish insult suggests you are not as old as you say you are.

Yea, I'm probably not any good, thats why I was on the 3rd best team in the world, and I'am known as one of the best infantry players in the world.

Its not common for people to have heard of professional gamers.

I've been playing games since before you were born.

Just because you are not familiar with terminology doesn't mean anything about how old you are, or how old I'am.

There are different types of audiences. You are part of the casual audience. I mean CoD is marketed towards a younger, more casual crowd, its extremely unlikely you are as old as you say you are.

I love it when people say that. I play games for fun, no other reason. I just get picked up by the best teams in the world because of how good I'am.

There is random spawning BF3, its called TDM. You have to be aware of your surrounds no matter what.

The fact that you don't know how to spell a simple word like "aware" also suggests you are not as old as you say you are.

If you play S&D in call of duty, then you know where your enemy is coming from, that fact alone makes your entire argument invalid.

You don't always know where your enemy is coming from in BF3, BF3 is so popular because of the amount of flanks, and different paths in every level.

You make a pretty terrible argument.

[QUOTE="JayQproductions"]

No, you spawn on your squad mates in BF3. One person from your squad camps and the rest of the squad just keeps respawning on him close to the objective and overwelming the other team. Also, good for you, you consider yourself a "hardcore game" and played professionally and competitively on both games, that just means you have no life, and your probably not even any good at the thing you've been wasting your life on because I've never heard of you......so you should probably find a new hobby. I've probably been playing games since before you where born so I dont go by the new age "hipster" talk of "core" and "casual" I play all types of video games because I enjoy them and like to have fun, not because I'm trying to become famous for playing a video game like you. And yes random spawns are better because like I said, you have to be constanatly awair of your surroundings. It takes more skill to defend from all angles versus knowing where your enemy is coming from.

CondorCalabasas

So because I make money playing video games, and you don't, that means I have no life? I'd think it would be the opposite.

Your attempt at a childish insult suggests you are not as old as you say you are.

Yea, I'm probably not any good, thats why I was on the 3rd best team in the world, and I'am known as one of the best infantry players in the world.

Its not common for people to have heard of professional gamers.

I've been playing games since before you were born.

Just because you are not familiar with terminology doesn't mean anything about how old you are, or how old I'am.

There are different types of audiences. You are part of the casual audience. I mean CoD is marketed towards a younger, more casual crowd, its extremely unlikely you are as old as you say you are.

I love it when people say that. I play games for fun, no other reason. I just get picked up by the best teams in the world because of how good I'am.

There is random spawning BF3, its called TDM. You have to be aware of your surrounds no matter what.

The fact that you don't know how to spell a simple word like "aware" also suggests you are not as old as you say you are.

If you play S&D in call of duty, then you know where your enemy is coming from, that fact alone makes your entire argument invalid.

You don't always know where your enemy is coming from in BF3, BF3 is so popular because of the amount of flanks, and different paths in every level.

You make a pretty terrible argument.

and i love when little kids like you think your some sort of superior elitist when because you prefer a certain game. Just stop kidding yourself and trying to sound like somebody to people on the internet, you've never made money playing games and your sure as hell not part of the 3rd best team in the world. If you where, you wouldnt be on here 24/7 posting about minecraft. Also, just the fact that you say there is no such thing as artificial lag tells me you are not part of any professional team let alone the 3rd best at any game.

and i love when little kids like you think your some sort of superior elitist when because you prefer a certain game. Just stop kidding yourself and trying to sound like somebody to people on the internet, you've never made money playing games and your sure as hell not part of the 3rd best team in the world. If you where, you wouldnt be on here 24/7 posting about minecraft. Also, just the fact that you say there is no such thing as artificial lag tells me you are not part of any professional team let alone the 3rd best at any game.

JayQproductions

If you have not come to realize this then you sir have not discovered the absolute fun that is had in a team based online FPS/war game. However, if you trying to play BF3 like you do CoD then you'll hate it. However, when you find a good squad and play agaisnt good squads you'll never be able to put this game down. How can this fact be denied? Please enlighten me. BTW i've owned every CoD up to BOps. Lets keep this civil.

Trinitarian