I cant decide and was wondering what your guys opinion was....i feel that bioshock may give the player too much freedom and you may lose interest by geting lost in the world and blue dragon demo was fun but it feels like it may get repetitive.....
And i would say Blue Dragon. I am just so on the fence with bioshock b/c it gives this forbodding feeling that i won't like it.
But the result here are probobly a little biased. Most people on this board would say bioshock definatly. So much so that they see this thread as stupid and not worth posting and that Blue Dragon is no competition for Bioshock. So they think one more Bioshock won't make a difference.
I cant decide and was wondering what your guys opinion was....i feel that bioshock may give the player too much freedom and you may lose interest by geting lost in the world and blue dragon demo was fun but it feels like it may get repetitive.....soquidsnake32
too much freedom??? why can't people decide for themselves these days. you know what interest you, so just go for it.
Blue Dragon seemed deep in the combat system, but I didn't like having 5 characters in battle (which I thought was a little much...I felt unstoppable) and the DragonBall Z graphics style is a big turnoff. If those criticisms don't bother you at all go for Blue Dragon.
And if you want a good RPG, look into Eternal Sonata. It's by far the superior RPG when compaired to Blue Dragon. I have no idea why its being so over shadowed... :(
Silly me for thinking this was a joke topic until i came to the painfull realization that the tc was dead serious. Blue Dragon isn't even the same sport let alone in the same league as Bioshock. Blue dragon is just another me too rpg, the type that i've played for the past decade and a half or longer (though it certainly has nice production values), where as Bioshock is a technical masterpiece with arguably some of the most engrossing environments and atmosphere of this generation and is hard to just classify it with just one label. I won't delve into the thematic differences because each can be enjoyable. With that said, Blue Dragon by no means is a bad game, hell, i'll still buy it; but if i had to choose it won't be Bioshock that gets dropped like retarded infant with bubonic plague. Blue Dragon will NOT rekindle that inspiring feeling of unbridled joy that Chrono Trigger left behind, the game just lacks the soul...seem a tad generic.
Blue Dragon all the way. I'm not into killing little girls.Staryoshi87
Then dont, thats the beauty of Bioshock, you have the choice of doing either, along with tons of other choices and decisions. I played the Blue Dragon demo and wasnt too impressed, but to be fair, I am not and have not been a fan of the JRPG since FF VII, although I hope Lost Oddessey will change that, Blue Dragon did not. I see myself getting trapped in an underwater utopia with all manner of strange creature trying to kill me in about a month :P
But the result here are probobly a little biased. Most people on this board would say bioshock definatly. So much so that they see this thread as stupid and not worth posting and that Blue Dragon is no competition for Bioshock. So they think one more Bioshock won't make a difference.
vendettared468
now look at this.
Silly me for thinking this was a joke topic until i came to the painfull realization that the tc was dead serious. Blue Dragon isn't even the same sport let alone in the same league as Bioshock. Blue dragon is just another me too rpg, the type that i've played for the past decade and a half or longer (though it certainly has nice production values), where as Bioshock is a technical masterpiece with arguably some of the most engrossing environments and atmosphere of this generation and is hard to just classify it with just one label. I won't delve into the thematic differences because each can be enjoyable. With that said, Blue Dragon by no means is a bad game, hell, i'll still buy it; but if i had to choose it won't be Bioshock that gets dropped like retarded infant with bubonic plague. Blue Dragon will NOT rekindle that inspiring feeling of unbridled joy that Chrono Trigger left behind, the game just lacks the soul...seem a tad generic.eNT1TY
If I remember from the Conference they were saying that Bioshock is only about twenty hours and i"m not sure how long Blue Dragon is but it look like it will take a while to max out all of your players.
Totally biased opinion here but Bioshock all the way cause system shock was amazing and i cant stand these JRPG'S Final fantasy 1 2 and 3 were enough for me.
I cant decide and was wondering what your guys opinion was....i feel that bioshock may give the player too much freedom and you may lose interest by geting lost in the world and blue dragon demo was fun but it feels like it may get repetitive.....soquidsnake32
For me, it will be Blue Dragon. I greatly enjoyed the playable-demo but the full game will be the real deal, it's gonna be a lot more fun. More spells, more treasures, towns, characters, etc. etc...
I will also be playing BioShock (if my brother picks it up that is)
Not sure. After playing the Blue Dragon demo, I thought it was fun, but it was REALLY easy and it looks like it will take ages to get those guys and their classes to level 99...I liked Eternal Sonata more.
Why is there ALWAYS a topic where people ask which game to get out of two. It's getting boring and stupid, why not just get both or browse the damn games and the reviews instead of asking here? There's alot more topics here that are way interesting then saying "yeah I think Bioshock is way better then Blue Dragon and you should get it."
Log in to comment