what is better Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare or Call of Duty: World at War
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It depends on what factors you're looking at. To me, I think both are at par. However, CoD4 had a short campaign, WaW enemy AI was poorly designed (frag fest anyone?). As for the MP...I don't know.
If you are unsure of what game to get, I would get the game with the preferred war setting. Personally, I liked COD4 more. The campaign was short, but excellent and the multiplayer is awesome. It has very little lag, great replaybility, and a fairly easy learning curve(for an FPS). I haven't had much experience with the COD WAW single player campaign, but the multiplayer is quite good as well. I prefer a modern setting, weapons, maps over the World War 2 setting, though they are both good games.
Moderm Warefare. It was one of the best COD games I have ever played, thanks to the new modern war setting that felt refreshing after playing so many WW2 shooters.
World at War on the other hand was a snooze fest.
I liked cod5 a whole lot more. I played it a lot more after I beat it than cod4. I liked the way there was more gore I guess. haha
WaW is far superior, better details, gore, bigger maps, longer story, tanks, and 65 ranks. As well as a 10th prestige icon that actually looks cool! They also have double experience weekends every month and their already putting out another map pack. Almost forgot, Nazi Zombies craps all over COD4's Arcade Mode.
Prefer for Multiplayer and Co-Op Of WAW... But if they had the same Multiplayer/Co-op Stuff But In Modern times... It would be awesome...( Guys At InfinityWard? Listen Up!?CODMW2 Ideas!!!)
i love both of the games and think they're great, but it depends on what you would want to play online, cod4 is much better if your going to play search and destroy. another thing to think about is the tanks in WaW, those will really piss you off, at least they do to me
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment