am I the only one person in the world that hates COD and treyarch. Ah treyarch, those lying, cheating, S.O.B, commies. And what bugs me the most about COD is how you jump very high in the air and all the bugs, mods, and hacks. (Sigh) tsk tsk tsk. Ok so you don't see real soldiers jumping up and down on the battlefield. And for all those modders who mod mutiplayer game go die. I mean if you mod a game like Fallout: New Vegas, I don't see a problem. But if you mod, hack, etc, a mutiplayer game like COD then thats affecting the servers and the community of people. Now a real first-person-shooter is Medal of Honor. That game rips it, I think it is one of the most realistic shooters out there. MOH will do better in the long run then COD I think. But i do say rent the new MOH, it is Amazing. So if you have anything to say leave a comment.
I have to disagree with your opinion of MoH. I think that game is average at best. It needs about 6 more maps, more game types and the whole spawn system needs reworked. Of all the miltary type FPS out on consoles right now, I think BFBC 2 is the best overall package and with the Vietnam add on coming, it may be going back into my rotation.
At the end of the day Black Ops is running on the CoD4 engine which was developed by Infinity Ward. Although there is no denying that Modern Warfare 2 was a huge success there were more exploits and hacks that I can be bothered to count so in my opinion Treyarch have done better so far. They also said in videos leading up to the Black Ops release that they were cracking down a lot on people modding the game which is more than Infinity Ward did. For me, MoH is too much like Bad Company 2 but i expected this because they put Dice in charge of the multiplayer, It still is a good game though not enough to beat Black Ops as far as I see it.
I've not encountered any major glitches or cheats in Black Ops. Aside from the spawning problems. it's vastly superior to Modern Warfare 2. As for Medal of Honor, who cares if it's more realistic. I don't play multiplayer shooters for realism, I play them to have fun.
Well as i said in my huge comment I think black ops will get run into the ground, maybe by all of the other blockbuster hits like Halo: Reach. Also another that might run it into the ground is treyarch itself. I think this because what if they make people start paying for online play? like they did with UFC 2010. They say they won't make people pay for online, but who knows. Maybe in a month or two they make people start paying for online. There will only be a handfull of people playing online. Only the true COD fans will pay for it, and the hackers will hack for online play. So i guess that would be a kinda plus, no more noobs online, but then again your changes of finding a match with hackers or modders in it will be sky high.
I've not encountered any major glitches or cheats in Black Ops. Aside from the spawning problems. it's vastly superior to Modern Warfare 2. As for Medal of Honor, who cares if it's more realistic. I don't play multiplayer shooters for realism, I play them to have fun.
speedfreak48t5p
realistic means a lot, aside from Halo: Reach, But how can it be fun if one team knifes across the map or has insta auto-aim? And as for MoH i think its really fun, more fun now because my brother got an xbox 360 and medal of honor, and we play matches together.
C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.
C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.MyersB93
I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.
[QUOTE="MyersB93"]C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.Solid_Legen
I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous.
[QUOTE="Solid_Legen"][QUOTE="MyersB93"]C.O.D is one the best running series for a long time, but everything must come to an end sometime. No one can put down Call of Duty just because the makers are screw ups, they made it the way they do all games in the own way. Sure M.O.H is more realistic in my opinion, but C.O.D is more of an arcade kind of feeling to it. It's just what your into I guess.MyersB93
I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous. Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.
[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="Solid_Legen"] I agree with what your saying with the it's just what your into. But what i don't agree with COD being one of the best running series for a long time. I think that should of just stopped COD after COD 4, and then tried to make a new series, and you know that people would buy the game if they made a new series, just because it's Actisvision or Treyarch. But if they stopped it at COD 4 I would still have some respect for them, i guess.Solid_Legen
Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous. Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop.
[QUOTE="Solid_Legen"][QUOTE="MyersB93"]Yeah, I would love to see another break out Military based series come out next year from either company! It's just Activision had a lot of sales for Call of Duty 4 and I see why they thought "why stop anything that's going this well". For that I respect them on some levels, but if you going to continue a series, you have to make it that much better then the previous. MyersB93
Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop. It just amazes me on how makers of games can be so worried over their game(I can see why). I mean look at Bethesda, they make great games. And they made Rogue Warrior which was like their "test game". I mean if your going to get worried about the game you should of posted a beta for it.
[QUOTE="MyersB93"][QUOTE="Solid_Legen"] Yeah, when they made MW2 they really dropped the ball and lost their general direction of where the game was heading, so instead of being better than COD 4, it was worse. And what confuses me, is that oringinaly zombies wasn't post to be in Black Ops. It was a "last minute" decision. They added it because they new it wasn't going to do well unless they added something that was interesting.Solid_Legen
exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop. It just amazes me on how makers of games can be so worried over their game(I can see why). I mean look at Bethesda, they make great games. And they made Rogue Warrior which was like their "test game". I mean if your going to get worried about the game you should of posted a beta for it.Your my new best friend..LMAO
[QUOTE="Solid_Legen"][QUOTE="MyersB93"]exactly, so as soon as your having doubts about th popularity of your game that's coming out in 2 weeks ( in example), then you just need to stop.MyersB93
It just amazes me on how makers of games can be so worried over their game(I can see why). I mean look at Bethesda, they make great games. And they made Rogue Warrior which was like their "test game". I mean if your going to get worried about the game you should of posted a beta for it.Your my new best friend..LMAO LOL
Medal of Honor amazing and Black Ops fail? Try harder next time... Medal of Honor is barely an average game. The MP is broken with poor map designs, spawn camp-fest. You have 90% of players sniping and no one dares to go out as assault or spec ops class. Terrible class system, terrible hit detection where you have to unload a full clip to just kill someone. It's one of the worst/most-hyped game I have played in a long time. I'm so glad I only put down $30 for a digital download. Even then, I would like my money back..heh
am I the only one person in the world that hates COD and treyarch. Ah treyarch, those lying, cheating, S.O.B, commies. And what bugs me the most about COD is how you jump very high in the air and all the bugs, mods, and hacks. (Sigh) tsk tsk tsk. Ok so you don't see real soldiers jumping up and down on the battlefield. And for all those modders who mod mutiplayer game go die. I mean if you mod a game like Fallout: New Vegas, I don't see a problem. But if you mod, hack, etc, a mutiplayer game like COD then thats affecting the servers and the community of people. Now a real first-person-shooter is Medal of Honor. That game rips it, I think it is one of the most realistic shooters out there. MOH will do better in the long run then COD I think. But i do say rent the new MOH, it is Amazing. So if you have anything to say leave a comment.Solid_Legen
If the game is making you this upset, i think its a good thing you are going back to moh. I've enjoyed Cod B:O. Of course there is going to be hackers and such. I was anticipating their return to the cod series. still doesn't really phase me. If they're there just leave the lobby or suck it up and prove that talent isn't bought.
[QUOTE="Solid_Legen"]am I the only one person in the world that hates COD and treyarch. Ah treyarch, those lying, cheating, S.O.B, commies. And what bugs me the most about COD is how you jump very high in the air and all the bugs, mods, and hacks. (Sigh) tsk tsk tsk. Ok so you don't see real soldiers jumping up and down on the battlefield. And for all those modders who mod mutiplayer game go die. I mean if you mod a game like Fallout: New Vegas, I don't see a problem. But if you mod, hack, etc, a mutiplayer game like COD then thats affecting the servers and the community of people. Now a real first-person-shooter is Medal of Honor. That game rips it, I think it is one of the most realistic shooters out there. MOH will do better in the long run then COD I think. But i do say rent the new MOH, it is Amazing. So if you have anything to say leave a comment.huytttr
If the game is making you this upset, i think its a good thing you are going back to moh. I've enjoyed Cod B:O. Of course there is going to be hackers and such. I was anticipating their return to the cod series. still doesn't really phase me. If they're there just leave the lobby or suck it up and prove that talent isn't bought. No it's not the people on the game or anything it's the game, and the company itself. How come during a X-Play they say things bad about Black-Ops and still give it 5 stars? and how come they say nothing bad about MoH but give it 4 stars??? I'll tell you why, the game is like a big baby to the media. Activision and treyarch pay other places to give it a good review, even though it's BS. you don't see Fallout NV doing that or MoH
Medal of Honor amazing and Black Ops fail? Try harder next time... Medal of Honor is barely an average game. The MP is broken with poor map designs, spawn camp-fest. You have 90% of players sniping and no one dares to go out as assault or spec ops class. Terrible class system, terrible hit detection where you have to unload a full clip to just kill someone. It's one of the worst/most-hyped game I have played in a long time. I'm so glad I only put down $30 for a digital download. Even then, I would like my money back..hehElann2008
MoH is a fail? I think you need to stop chucking the cool-aid of Black-Ops buddy. MoH is twice the game Black-Ops is. And don't come crying to gamespot when they make you pay for online.
Black ops isn't full of bugs and glitches although the respawns are terrible right now but Treyarch said they are working on a patch. MW2 on the other hand is full of bugs, exploits, and Commando. If any developer is bad it is IW at least Treyarch is attempting to fix the series.
Black ops isn't full of bugs and glitches although the respawns are terrible right now but Treyarch said they are working on a patch. MW2 on the other hand is full of bugs, exploits, and Commando. If any developer is bad it is IW at least Treyarch is attempting to fix the series.craigalan23
IW has shown they're a good developer, but I have a feeling mw2 was rushed from activision (there were alot of problems amongst the two-a big reason IW is gone)
[QUOTE="craigalan23"]Black ops isn't full of bugs and glitches although the respawns are terrible right now but Treyarch said they are working on a patch. MW2 on the other hand is full of bugs, exploits, and Commando. If any developer is bad it is IW at least Treyarch is attempting to fix the series.Microsoft1234
IW has shown they're a good developer, but I have a feeling mw2 was rushed from activision (there were alot of problems amongst the two-a big reason IW is gone)
He is complaining about hacks, bugs, and glitches when that was all on IW not Treyarch.
am I the only one person in the world that hates COD and treyarch. Ah treyarch, those lying, cheating, S.O.B, commies. And what bugs me the most about COD is how you jump very high in the air and all the bugs, mods, and hacks. (Sigh) tsk tsk tsk. Ok so you don't see real soldiers jumping up and down on the battlefield. And for all those modders who mod mutiplayer game go die. I mean if you mod a game like Fallout: New Vegas, I don't see a problem. But if you mod, hack, etc, a mutiplayer game like COD then thats affecting the servers and the community of people. Now a real first-person-shooter is Medal of Honor. That game rips it, I think it is one of the most realistic shooters out there. MOH will do better in the long run then COD I think. But i do say rent the new MOH, it is Amazing. So if you have anything to say leave a comment.Solid_Legen
I have not, and do not know of, any modding, hacking, cheating in BO yet
Infact I'm quite good at it (well 1.3 K/D)
You should try to make some bullet points and re-read your post, because it doesn't sound like you've actually played the game, but if you really regret your purchase than that sucks and I'm sorry for you but like most of us, I researched the heck out of BO before release and I (among many million others) praise Trey for actually making cod good again
[QUOTE="Microsoft1234"][QUOTE="craigalan23"]Black ops isn't full of bugs and glitches although the respawns are terrible right now but Treyarch said they are working on a patch. MW2 on the other hand is full of bugs, exploits, and Commando. If any developer is bad it is IW at least Treyarch is attempting to fix the series.craigalan23
IW has shown they're a good developer, but I have a feeling mw2 was rushed from activision (there were alot of problems amongst the two-a big reason IW is gone)
He is complaining about hacks, bugs, and glitches when that was all on IW not Treyarch.
Yea I don't remember any issues with waw and haven't heard of or had any with BO.
Treyarch plans to actually fix their games and took out most of the broken stuff in MW2.
Spawning can be bad sometimes yes, but I check my corners all the time so I don't usually have much of a problem
am I the only one person in the world that hates COD and treyarch. Ah treyarch, those lying, cheating, S.O.B, commies. And what bugs me the most about COD is how you jump very high in the air and all the bugs, mods, and hacks. (Sigh) tsk tsk tsk. Ok so you don't see real soldiers jumping up and down on the battlefield. And for all those modders who mod mutiplayer game go die. I mean if you mod a game like Fallout: New Vegas, I don't see a problem. But if you mod, hack, etc, a mutiplayer game like COD then thats affecting the servers and the community of people. Now a real first-person-shooter is Medal of Honor. That game rips it, I think it is one of the most realistic shooters out there. MOH will do better in the long run then COD I think. But i do say rent the new MOH, it is Amazing. So if you have anything to say leave a comment.Solid_Legen
...no u r not the one that hates CoD but that doesnt mean the game is a FAIL !!!
Medal of Honor could have been good if sh!tty Dice wouldnt have made the multiplayer on their crappy looking frostbite engine, and if the maps where smaller with more of them, id rather have 10 medium sized maps then 4 huge maps that half the map doesnt even get used.
Black ops is class. So much better than mw2. I have heard of a lot of people trading it in and going back to mw2. I say good, let them. coz they are the kind of players who moan about a game being too difficult because the guns have recoil and you can't kill people as easy. this will help black ops become a better online game with better players than the farce that was mw2.
as for moh and bad company, i dunno, haven't played them.
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]Medal of Honor amazing and Black Ops fail? Try harder next time... Medal of Honor is barely an average game. The MP is broken with poor map designs, spawn camp-fest. You have 90% of players sniping and no one dares to go out as assault or spec ops class. Terrible class system, terrible hit detection where you have to unload a full clip to just kill someone. It's one of the worst/most-hyped game I have played in a long time. I'm so glad I only put down $30 for a digital download. Even then, I would like my money back..hehSolid_Legen
MoH is a fail? I think you need to stop chucking the cool-aid of Black-Ops buddy. MoH is twice the game Black-Ops is. And don't come crying to gamespot when they make you pay for online. MoH is garbage. I dont even see how you could compare the two when MoH has so much more problems, spawn system, hit detection, sniper campers, servers are garbage, ect, and I only played the game for 30 mins and noticed all those problems. Black Ops is far superior in ever aspect of the game.
I think out of all the games being talked about Black Ops is the best. The class customizing is superior to the other games mentioned, but I admit that BC2 comes in a very close second. But seriously each time I play a new game online the more I just want to stick to playing single player or co-op online games.
Just about everyone on this fourm is just about retarded, Black-Ops is no where close to good if they have take other things from games, and add other things last minute. If for those of you who are like WHAT?! to this comment, i'll list some of the things they took from other games and added in last minute. For first they took the emblem thing, hmm wonder where they got that from? Halo: Reach is where they stole that from, and oh you can put that emblem on your gun! HOW FUN! not. They also stole the theater mode from Halo: Reach, I mean, come on how obvious is that. Oh and a remote control rocket.... *sigh* when will they ever learn. If you add a remote control rocket to the game the game just gets all Bullsh!tty, You'll have people camping in the corner with the rocket just firing and controling where its going to get kills. Also thing they added last minute is Zombies. I don't even see how Nazi zombies come into the game at all. I mean with COD world at war, that was a great time to introduce zombies. But in black-ops? I think they added it just for sales, because Treyarch knew Black-Ops won't do good in the long-run. So don't post on this fourm anymore, and go back to eating your popcorn and playing Black-Ops. Because it's a game meant for all the noobs. That's why you think your so great at the game. Only thing Black-Ops is useful for is wiping your a$$
Just about everyone on this fourm is just about retarded, Black-Ops is no where close to good if they have take other things from games, and add other things last minute. If for those of you who are like WHAT?! to this comment, i'll list some of the things they took from other games and added in last minute. For first they took the emblem thing, hmm wonder where they got that from? Halo: Reach is where they stole that from, and oh you can put that emblem on your gun! HOW FUN! not. They also stole the theater mode from Halo: Reach, I mean, come on how obvious is that. Oh and a remote control rocket.... *sigh* when will they ever learn. If you add a remote control rocket to the game the game just gets all Bullsh!tty, You'll have people camping in the corner with the rocket just firing and controling where its going to get kills. Also thing they added last minute is Zombies. I don't even see how Nazi zombies come into the game at all. I mean with COD world at war, that was a great time to introduce zombies. But in black-ops? I think they added it just for sales, because Treyarch knew Black-Ops won't do good in the long-run. So don't post on this fourm anymore, and go back to eating your popcorn and playing Black-Ops. Because it's a game meant for all the noobs. That's why you think your so great at the game. Only thing Black-Ops is useful for is wiping your a$$Solid_Legen
There is a reason why Medal of Honor is not even the the Top 20 most played Xbox Live Titles.... Because it sucks ass. All Medal Of Honor is and will be is a poor attempt to copy MW2 and it failed miserable.
lol, a rip off of MW2? Ya right you wish upon your life that most likely sucks. At least MOH hasn't used the same engine, over, and over, and over again. They actually try to change it up unlike some games, not to point any out *cough cough Call of duty cough cough*.
Log in to comment