This topic is locked from further discussion.
Worth $60?insane_metalist
If you don't mind ww2 games yes. Four player campaign,zombie mode,and a great multiplayer.
Wow, I was really skeptical of Treyarch for the next game. I must say they really did a fantastic job. I actually think this solo campaign is better than CoD4s... the levels are so well done, and the story is fantastic, especially the russian missions, simple fantastic.mfp16I have too agree big time with you about this game what makes it such a big hit for me is the coop online and offline. They took the best parts of 4 and added the rest to it and came up with the perfect shooter
[QUOTE="insane_metalist"]Worth $60?craigalan23
If you don't mind ww2 games yes. Four player campaign,zombie mode,and a great multiplayer.
you know, I really thought I wasn't going to be able to stomach another WW2 game... but it was so well done I think I was even happy that is was back in WW2, it gave some historical weight to the great story.... talking generally about the Russian missions, I felt myself feeling like I was actually avenging my fallen comrades!I don't understand why CODWAW is more expensive then all the other games.FNKYMNK
Because it just came out?
This game is pretty much a cookie cutter copy of COD4; just subbed the weapons with old ones and went with it. Even though it is a decent game I still have yet to complete the story mode, so can't really say much as to the quality of the story, except its somewhat difficult.coreymx2006They definitely took a lot from 4, but I think they made some nice improvements. The graphics are better, they added some gore to it (Not very noticeable in the MP, but in the single player it definitely stands out and in a very good way.) and provided four-player co-op along with a fun zombie mode. It didn't make the same leaps forward that COD4 did, but it's still far above the average sequel.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment