Well, the BETA is only a tease of the real game. I bloody wish I could test out that flamethrower, shame nothing gets carried over to the retail.
It's basically CoD4, even the red dot sight is still in it as an aperture sight. Same thing, just ones got a black dot and the red has well, a red dot.
I really enjoy war though.
Rehehelly
I really hate how they are adding silencers and red dots into the game, just renaming them. I'm sure these things existed back in WW2, but I am also pretty sure that they weren't used as commonly as this game makes it seem. In Modern Warfare it makes sense to have ACOG's and red dots on all the weapons, but silencers and red dot on all WW2 weapons? cmon....
The only thing that I'm looking forward to about this particular WW2 game that deviates from all the other WW2 shooters is the different guns they have. Aside from the typical American weapons loadout, I am loving how they have put Soviet weapons, as well as the Japanese weapons into this game.
I haven't played the beta yet, but I have watched quite a few youtube videos of it, and to me, both the gameplay, graphics, and overall feel of the game is damn near identical to COD4. UAV is now recon planes (which is completely stupid since they can apparently see through walls), Airstrikes are now artillery, and instead of helicopters you get dogs. I am glad they are releasing CTF for multiplayer though.
The problem with both of these games is that the creators essentially tried to create an infantry based FPS, but they ruined it by adding in support like UAV air strikes, and the ever-annoying/hacking helicopter in Modern Warfare. If they removed these artificial forms of aid, the game would be 2x better than it currently is, because then you wouldn't have an awesome fire fight or intense duel rudely interrupted by artillery and the likes.
Log in to comment