Call of Duty: World at War graphics worse than COD4?

hi all,

first off, the new COD: World at War trailer looks surprisingly good. One thing bothered me however. The graphical fidelity of the new footage does not look up to COD4 standards, although it's using the same engine. Also, the Framerate does not seem as fast as 60 fp/s as the soldiers running in the new trailer look a bit sluggish.

If you go back and watch the COD4 trailer which debuted last year, it looks better...

this is somewhat troubling. Hoepfully Treyarch can make the gameplay look and run as well as COD4.

COD: World at War trailer: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

COD4 trailer: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31550.html

it doesnt come out for 2 years so i right now i am not gunna really care what it looks like

gameplay sounds alot cooler online and in single player from what ive been reading

also i dont see why everyone hates ww2 cause this is a theter of war thats hardly ever been done

plus if the did make modern combat two it would be a whole lot more boring

think about it: were in some fake iraq like nation and were killing 100s of stereotypical muslim pshycos and they have some evil plan to destroy the world:roll:

It looks 8X more badass than 4 and its got large multiplayer simmalar to 4 with vehecles so i can give a royal flying F!#$ if the graphics are allitle less shiny than 4.

this game is gonna kick ass.

im with tundra it looks amazing and i will buy it. i used to play cod3 mp alot but i hated the singleplayer.

but then again i buy shooters for online competition if i wanted story id play an rpg. i personally cared nothing for the story of 4 it was ripped straight from cnn

im with tundra it looks amazing and i will buy it. i used to play cod3 mp alot but i hated the singleplayer.

but then again i buy shooters for online competition if i wanted story id play an rpg. i personally cared nothing for the story of 4 it was ripped straight from cnn

Djmaster214

what do u mean cnn? like the news program? really, where did u hear that?

hi all,

first off, the new COD: World at War trailer looks surprisingly good. One thing bothered me however. The graphical fidelity of the new footage does not look up to COD4 standards, although it's using the same engine. Also, the Framerate does not seem as fast as 60 fp/s as the soldiers running in the new trailer look a bit sluggish.

If you go back and watch the COD4 trailer which debuted last year, it looks better...

this is somewhat troubling. Hoepfully Treyarch can make the gameplay look and run as well as COD4.

COD: World at War trailer: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

COD4 trailer: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/31550.html

wiiman555

CoD WaW Trailor: What, pre alpha? maybe?

CoD4 Trailor: Seeing as how the date of when that trailor was put up is after the game was even released, we may have our reason.

All I'm askin' is for people to stop judging a game that doesn't come out for a long time.

It looks 8X more badass than 4 and its got large multiplayer simmalar to 4 with vehecles so i can give a royal flying F!#$ if the graphics are allitle less shiny than 4.

this game is gonna kick ass.

Tundrawarlord

AMEN!

This game already looks amazing. With the time they have left, they can only improve.

It's a day-one buy for me (unless early reviews condemn it).

[QUOTE="Djmaster214"]

im with tundra it looks amazing and i will buy it. i used to play cod3 mp alot but i hated the singleplayer.

but then again i buy shooters for online competition if i wanted story id play an rpg. i personally cared nothing for the story of 4 it was ripped straight from cnn

charomid

what do u mean cnn? like the news program? really, where did u hear that?

i'd also like to know why everyone hates treyarch cod games. i 've played 2, 3, and 4 and although 4 is my favorite, 2 and 3 were both very good games. i didn't play 2 or 3's online because i thought it was a lil boring ( just my opinion). i found that the single player in 2, 3, and 4 were all amazing and cinematic. although 4 has been the only one that i 've liked for online play, 2 and 3 were still great games and the only big difference i can tell between 2 and 3 is that 3's graphics are better and 3 was a little shorter than 2. i'm really looking forward to cod:waw, i think its going to be another great game, whether or not the online is good.

Just skip it. Wait for the next true COD sequel. Don't get confused by their marketing deception.wmc540

i agree

even though they said they were using the same engine and have co-op, the fact that its in WWII makes it not as good.

Cod4 looks damn good in 720p on my 1366 X 768 Plasma, I can't imagine why the level of detail would be comprimised in the new title.

i still think the new cod would be better if they stayed modern and not back to wwii weapons and equipment.

also i dont see why everyone hates ww2 cause this is a theter of war thats hardly ever been done

ARO1993

say what?!?!

[QUOTE="ARO1993"]

also i dont see why everyone hates ww2 cause this is a theter of war thats hardly ever been done

FOSyay

say what?!?!

Pacific.

[QUOTE="FOSyay"][QUOTE="ARO1993"]

also i dont see why everyone hates ww2 cause this is a theter of war thats hardly ever been done

craigalan23

ok sorry, I thought he ment WW2 as a whole has hardly ever been done before

say what?!?!

Pacific.

dangit, I messed that up

what I was saying was I thought he ment WW2 itself has hardly ever been done

It looks 8X more badass than 4 and its got large multiplayer simmalar to 4 with vehecles so i can give a royal flying F!#$ if the graphics are allitle less shiny than 4.

this game is gonna kick ass.

Tundrawarlord

It looks 8X more badass than 4 and its got large multiplayer simmalar to 4 with vehecles so i can give a royal flying F!#$ if the graphics are allitle less shiny than 4.

this game is gonna kick ass.

Agreed.

Tundrawarlord

yo didn't they already do a Pacific one though.
it might of been a different game but wasn't Rising Sun COD or was it something else?
if it was COD then they've done Pacific before

yo didn't they already do a Pacific one though.
it might of been a different game but wasn't Rising Sun COD or was it something else?
if it was COD then they've done Pacific before

Mr_Wes32

rising sun was MOH.

I really liked that game. Playing co-op was fun but many people bashed it.

It's gonna have vehicles?? Aw, man. I detest MP with vehicles.

Simply because some knucklehead just drive around the map running everything and everybody over. It gets old quick.

It's gonna have vehicles?? Aw, man. I detest MP with vehicles.

Simply because some knucklehead just drive around the map running everything and everybody over. It gets old quick.

marcus4hire

I take it you won't be playing Bad Company this Wednesday then?

I welcome vehicles! Especially when they enhance the MP like they did in COD3. The way to combat someone running everyone over. . . .an RPG! Any squad worth its salt has someone who deals with those exact kind of knuckleheads! People will stop trying to run everyone over if they can't even leave their base or get exploded in the first few minutes after they get into the vehicle.

Personally I am not getting the game, just cause there is so many other quality games coming out.

But for the sake of your argument apparently Treyarch is using the same engine Infitity Ward used for CoD4, so graphically they shouldn't be much different.