BIA has always bored me. COD is less realstic but it's a game so I'll take fun over realistic any day. And COD Multiplayer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BIA Multiplayer
i dont see how the ww2 setting is over...when was the last time we had a ww2 game? medal of honor airborne doesnt count because nobody bought it so really the last ww2 game i can remember off the top of my head was call of duty 3, and the last good ww2 game was call of duty 2 and that was 3 years ago, so im ready for another ww2 game. im going to vote brothers in arms because the call of duty formula is being used over and over again anually and im tired of it because each game feels exactly the same, just like madden which i refuse to buy. its beena long time for brothers in arms so im ready for a new one.
Truthfully, both previews seem to lack something that I want, I can't imagine what it is, killing and violence, what more is needed? Anywho, I like the Brother in Arms vids better than the Call of Duty: WaW vids.
ide say i wasnt excited for call of duty world at war till i played brothers in arms. bia has been so good so far that now i want another ww2 game, just one with coop. so, ide say bia is the better single player game and has better gameplay overal but the features cod has with coop and multiplayer make it equally as appealing now in my eyes.
BIA IS an awesome game. The gameplay is great, the story is great. The campaign blows COD out of the water. Sure, the multiplayer is awful but it depends on your preference. If ur lookin for an arcade type shooter COD is great. If ur lookin for a realistic shooter, BIA is thhe way to go.
Log in to comment