CoD 4 or CoD:WaW?? (Poll)

So I want another good FPS for my 360 and I know that CoD is supossed to be an awsome series.( I havent played CoD sence CoD: The Big Red One)

So In your mind witch is better. CoD 4 or WaW?

WaW is newer but the WWII games are a little played out.

CoD 4 has the new guns and supplys.

So can you guys help me out?

Definitely Modern Warfare. The multiplayer in World at War has some serious issues and just isn't near as fast paced. Plus, spawning is HORRIBLE in World at War, at least in Call of Duty it's rare if you spawn near an enemy, in World at War you pretty much spawn with a bullet in your brain.

Four player co-op and zombie mode made me enjoy COD:Waw more. Though both games are great. Also COD4 will probably drop in price once COD:MW2 comes out later this year.

MW with out a doubt!

I own both games and I think Call of Duty 4 is the better game. World at War is good too but CoD4 is awesome.

Are we talking single player or multiplayer?

For single player, I'd say the edge goes to Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare but for multiplayer it comes down to if you want to play in the WWII setting or modern day setting. I, myself, perfer WWII weapons over modern day weapons, so I give the edge in multiplayer to Call of Duty: World at War. Also, the zombies mode is a nice plus if you have a few friends to play with.

I say CoD4 cuz its looks better and newer guns

cod 4 for sure... i own both and cod 4 is so good it makes me not like cod waw... and don't get me wrong cod waw is a good game and would be an amazing game for me if i didn't own cod 4... that's how good cod 4 is.

Try both then decide, if you can. COD4 is just one of the best games ever. WaW is awesome, much better than I thought, and I found myself playing it endlessly just like COD4. But, if I have to pick, I'll choose COD4. But it's still pretty close. And yes, what someone else said - the spawning in WaW can be baaaaaaad. It works kinda like Halo 3, where parties have an advantage and if you're playing alone, due to uncooperative, childish people, you're screwed. In Waw, there are parties of people playing, they function like a squad in a battlefield game. Whenever people, friends, in the squad die, they respawn WHEREVER their squad leader or other members are. This means one single enemy can sneak up behind your team's battlefront, then have all his buddies spawn up with him, and rape you from behind. It's definitely... a problem.. and personally (maybe because I don't HAVE many friends) I hate games that give advantage or priority to people who come as a group.

But still, it's very fun. COD4 seems to feel like more of a special forces type of thing, where a few people are infiltrating a location, or where small armies are having skirmishes. WaW feels like world war. (Isn't that the point?)

and to the guy above me.. I agree. I didn't like the first Gears as much as I thought I would, but Gears 2 certainly is one of the best games ever.

If you like World War II get CoD: WAW

If you like modern warfare get CoD: MW

well lets see Cod 4 was game of the year so...franciscochicho

go with the crowd and have no personal opinion? Alright then!

I like CoD 4 more,but stop being followers people.

I'm getting tired of WaW's mp40, its the only gun anyone ever uses in the game. So i go with modern warfare.

CoD4 IMO, I like CoD:WaW but not as much as CoD4:MW

There both great games, but I think that Call Of Duty 4 Modern Warfare, is by far the best Call Of Duty game.

I'm going to go with COD4. I felt that the single player campaign was absolutely brilliant. It blew me away. Don't let the shortness of it cloud your vision when it comes to deciding what game to choose. Although short, I feel that COD4 can be played through many times whereas after one playthrough of WaW's campaign I have no desire to play it again.

Then theres the multiplayer. The multiplayer on both games is fantastic. Both games are excellent in terms of online gaming, however I can't shake the feeling that I'm playing COD4 with different guns when I'm playing WaW. They feel and look very similar. I think its very lazy on Treyarch's behalf to not even rename the perks they took from COD4. Also with the online, I believe that COD4 has more maps and a better variety. For example, on WaW some of the maps are very similar (Upheaval and Outskirts anyone?).

However, Treyarch did add some new things to multiplayer which are great. First we have the ability to play the whole campaign co-operatively. This works very well and with a good connection lag isn't really noticeable. The second new addition is Nazi Zombies mode. Although very simple, this mode is very effective. When playing with three other players it becomes really entertaining and intense. Its a great experience.

Oh and before I forget, I must add that WaW does have a region filter, which makes getting lag-free games a breeze.

In conclusion, although WaW is a great game I feel its trying to be something its not, COD4. If they had put a little bit more time and thought into the maps and perks than I feel it could have really beaten out COD4 in terms of multiplayer. The single player however, is undoubtedly better on COD4.

Please keep in mind, this is all my opinion and may not reflect yours. If I were you I'd rent both out and give them both a try before deciding.

I have both and I started to get bored of WaW for some reason. The WWII genre in general is just getting boring...

If you're new to the newer CoD games, then I highly suggest CoD4.

The story was great, gameplay was solid, multiplayer is still really active.

It was the game to introduce all of the things that make WaW awesome.

CoD4 = More advanced gadgets, guns

CoDWaW = Old guns, dogs instead of air strikes

You decide.

call of duty 4

the results don't surprise me at all, CoD 4 is way better

Then theres the multiplayer. The multiplayer on both games is fantastic. Both games are excellent in terms of online gaming, however I can't shake the feeling that I'm playing COD4 with different guns when I'm playing WaW. They feel and look very similar. I think its very lazy on Treyarch's behalf to not even rename the perks they took from COD4. Also with the online, I believe that COD4 has more maps and a better variety. For example, on WaW some of the maps are very similar (Upheaval and Outskirts anyone?).

COD4_Shinedown

Upheaval is nothing like outskirts ......

This again? Really?

i love them both but i like cod4 better.

i thought they were both really good. if i were you id get cod4 though bc its a little better and its cheaper

I think... COD 4:MW

After playing COD 4 today. COD 4 is a much better game then COD WAW IMO. I like the feel of it much better then the boring old WW2 setting thats been overdone, but COD WAW is still a good game and i still play it. I just like COD 4 better for some reason.