COD 4 vs. HALO 3

Everyone vote on which is better, i want honest opinions on gameplay, story mode and multiplayer.But if you dont want to explain just say which is better.

This thread is almost designed as a poll (im sure this poll will have someflamers but its all just good fun)

CoD 4 is funner probably but Halo 3 is very fun

it funny to compare two game that the ONLY thing in common is that they are first person shooter. they dont even play like each other. halo is still betterhaven79

STFU, they are both FPS. That's enough. COD4 does rock halo's balls.

it funny to compare two game that the ONLY thing in common is that they are first person shooter. they dont even play like each other. halo is still betterhaven79

Looks like someone didn't have the mental capacity to compare and contrast in middle school.

Well I have played COD4 but I don't own it so I haven't gotten to really try out the campaign. I have played enough multi-player to know that it is one of the best multi-player games out there. I do own Halo and have played it plenty. I really didn't like it as much as previous Halos. Seeing as I don't have enough knowledge to really compair the games I would leave you with this...

I wouldn't expect an honest comparison between the games from a person with a Master Chief avatar...

Wow, you got me. With all of those good examples to prove your point, there is no way i can top that. Let's see. They are the same in the sense that they are both shooters. Both games use guns. Both games have you running and gunning other players. Deathmatch is a fairly popular gameplay mode on BOTH games. Halo three uses shields, which is different, but then it also recharges so the player can get hit a few times, then recover as if starting over. That seems very similar, if not the same to COD4. COD4 is way better, IMO, because killing feels so much more satisfying. Halo has a gun, smack, and repeat formula, so it always feels the same. Halo sux in comparison. Eye_See

frst of all they are different, any person who has been gaming for a while will tell you that...so dont be noobish and comment on stuff that you dont know about....secondly if the cod4 3 shot kill appeals more to you than the more challenging halo killing technique, then thats fine, dont go saying thsi game sucks and that game sucks just because you suck at it......

Everyone vote on which is better, i want honest opinions on gameplay, story mode and multiplayer.But if you dont want to explain just say which is better.

This thread is almost designed as a poll (im sure this poll will have someflamers but its all just good fun)

Aang007

Well obviously Halo 3 wins in storyline/single player. But Halo 3 also wins because it's hell of a lot more challenging than Call of Duty 4 (online multiplayer). Like I've said in various other threads...Call of Duty 4 requires absolutely no skill to play since it's a hide-and-seek game. The first one to see the other opponent first, wins. Requires no skill at all.

Halo 3 is much more challenging because of the fact it's just not like that (although Halo 2 and 3 felt way dumbed down compared to the first Halo).

[QUOTE="Eye_See"]Wow, you got me. With all of those good examples to prove your point, there is no way i can top that. Let's see. They are the same in the sense that they are both shooters. Both games use guns. Both games have you running and gunning other players. Deathmatch is a fairly popular gameplay mode on BOTH games. Halo three uses shields, which is different, but then it also recharges so the player can get hit a few times, then recover as if starting over. That seems very similar, if not the same to COD4. COD4 is way better, IMO, because killing feels so much more satisfying. Halo has a gun, smack, and repeat formula, so it always feels the same. Halo sux in comparison. Iron_Re4

frst of all they are different, any person who has been gaming for a while will tell you that...so dont be noobish and comment on stuff that you dont know about....secondly if the cod4 3 shot kill appeals more to you than the more challenging halo killing technique, then thats fine, dont go saying thsi game sucks and that game sucks just because you suck at it......

You're right, they are different. COD4 is the pinnacle of console FPS, Halo 3 is just a cookie-cutter FPS with no character customization.

Call of duty kicks ass by a landslide. Halo 3 gets old after a while. Was a huge let down to me. But CAll of Duty just had to take the gold eventually.

[QUOTE="haven79"]it funny to compare two game that the ONLY thing in common is that they are first person shooter. they dont even play like each other. halo is still betterEye_See

STFU, they are both FPS. That's enough. COD4 does rock halo's balls.

So are you saying that Bioshock and CoD 4 can be compared?

The first one to see the other opponent first, wins. Requires no skill at all.

Halo 3 is much more challenging because of the fact it's just not like that (although Halo 2 and 3 felt way dumbed down compared to the first Halo).

Ironfungus

uhh that happens in halo as well pal. if you see someone and start taking out their shield first, if you melee, you will win since it's "whoever has more health wins" rule now.

COD IV is a far superior game. I had feelings when the ending of COD IV was shown, and I felt badass blowing helicoptors with an RPG

(I do play the PC Version of COD rather than the 360)

Multiplayer is far funner as well

dont own either yet cause my 360 is broken. and ive played halo 3.

but, on my list of games to buy COD 4 is number 1, and halo 3 is like 10

[QUOTE="haven79"]it funny to compare two game that the ONLY thing in common is that they are first person shooter. they dont even play like each other. halo is still betterEye_See

STFU, they are both FPS. That's enough. COD4 does rock halo's balls.

One's tactical and one's sci-fi, that's enough of a difference.

Depends on what kind of gameplay you like better. I'm an aggressive gamer so I go with Halo 3 because I don't like the whole idea of taking cover most of the match.GalesOfOctober

THANK YOU!!!

THese two games arent even the same its hard to compare....

Halo is a sci fi shooter where as Call of Duty 4 is a modern shooter

WHich are completely diffrent genres of shooters.

Halo 3 has vehicles are large combat with fun multiplayer and a good story

Call of duty has vehicles but you cant control them great customizabilty fun multiplayer

I like both just the same, they are both the top of there fields in shooters

THese two games arent even the same its hard to compare....

Halo is a sci fi shooter where as Call of Duty 4 is a modern shooter

WHich are completely diffrent genres of shooters.

Halo 3 has vehicles are large combat with fun multiplayer and a good story

Call of duty has vehicles but you cant control them great customizabilty fun multiplayer

I like both just the same, they are both the top of there fields in shooters

RalphWiggum1