[QUOTE="CNUrGames"]I think honestly the biggest problem people have with WaW is they feel like WW2 weapons are weaker and dumber than modern weapons and so they stick with MW1seankane
Well I wouldn't say because they are 'weaker and dumber', but I do have to admit that some of the modern guns can be a bit more thrilling to use.
But I dont think thats necessarily it. WW2 in general is just overdone, and then compounded with the fact that WaW has pretty much the same gameplay as CoD4 makes some people wonder why they should bother. I played WaW quite a while, but I've since gone back to CoD4 cuz it just feels more refreshing. Plus, there's no tanks!
I dont know. I generally just feel WaW is the weaker of the two games since its more derivative and arguably 'just another WW2 game', so even though its getting extra DLC support, it might be a hard buy, value-wise, for many people. I bought the first map pack, but I didn't get the 2nd, andI dont think I'll be getting the 3rd, either.
We'll see, though. If MW2 turns out to be just 'more of the same', then I might consider getting the map packs and just sticking with CoD4 and WaW. I'm not too keen on spending $60 for what could possibly just be the equivalent of a new CoD4 map pack(I dont care about single-player).
See I'm with you on not being a huge Single player person. I won't even play the campaign of MW2 for a while after I get it (which concerns me with all the emphasis they're putting on continuing the story) so WaW has provided a good experience for me because they are continuing support. 2 years later, the MW1 maps are a little boring and I played it again after putting it down for a while and had fun, but I like World at War just because it seems like they took a refreshing system (MW1) put a tired facade on it (WW2) but polished up some of the gameplay elements.
Log in to comment