cod4 vs battlefield 2 modern combat vs halo 3.........whats your opinion?

mine is all of them

i know

Battlefield games have been terrible so far on consoles in my opinionkozzy1234

but it is amazing on PC :)

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]Battlefield games have been terrible so far on consoles in my opinion_RA0_

but it is amazing on PC :)

But we're not playing on PC :)

well, despite the fact that these three games are only similar in the fact that they are all FPS games, i would have to go with Halo 3 b/c it is the most groundbreaking game and adds strategy to an already intense game. This is how I see Halo 3 pulling ahead of the rest of the competition not to mention that Halo 3 sold 4.8 million copies last year...zelda_nub13

please explain the following two questions:

#1: how it is groundbreaking?

#2: Strategy in Halo 3?

1) halo in general is groundbreaking b/c of the nature of it, it is set in futuristic world and most FPS gams in that genre cannot keep up with it especially in the weapons department

2) there is ADDED strategy in halo 3, (not that there is alot overall) b/c of the bubble shield, health regen, etc...not to mention new weapons and vehicles

1) halo in general is groundbreaking b/c of the nature of it, it is set in futuristic world and most FPS gams in that genre cannot keep up with it especially in the weapons department

2) there is ADDED strategy in halo 3, (not that there is alot overall) b/c of the bubble shield, health regen, etc...not to mention new weapons and vehicles

zelda_nub13

its groundbreaking cause its a futuristic fps? hahaha, there are already like 100s of futuristic fps, halo is the least thing from groundbreaking, its so generic

stuff like health regen isnt strategy, lol its just common sense to wait till u have full health before u run into battle

I haven't played Battlefield 2, but I like CoD4 more than Halo 3. Only downside of CoD4 is that it doesn't have co-op.