[QUOTE="EnderSR388"][QUOTE="tbolt76"] That is not the whole story.
I saw it sometime ago...
PiNwOrM
Good post! Like I said, I read it in an OXM issue. You know there not going to give the WHOLE story since they support MS. It also didn't state that the case was from 2005 either.
So it sounds like he let his underage son use his debit card, without properly finding any information on the service that his son was about to sign up for, which signing up for XBL is technically a contractual agreement. Hmm, sounds like his fault. The only thing I can see is that he might say that MS engaged in a contractual agreement with a minor. I would still think the father would be at fault since the child is under his supervision, right? I think it's a stupid suit and completely ridiculous!
MS didn't engage in a contractual agreement with a minor, a minor fraudulently engaged (he started it, it wasn't microsoft offering) the contractual agreement.
If anyone should be suing anyone, it would be microsoft suing them for fraud.
It doesn't matter who initiates the contract. Under our law (US) a minor doesn't have the capacity to contract and any contract agreed upon is void. But this is a little different because the minor used his dads card and had no face to face contact with MS. It's kind of like the assumption that if you use a CC to purchase something online you are stating that you are an adult, over 18. And that's held up in court. So even if you end up being a minor the company won't be held liable.
Log in to comment