Dissapointed.....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamingboss
gamingboss

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gamingboss
Member since 2010 • 170 Posts

I am very dissapointed with BF3. Very laggy, gameplay is very difficult, only 24 players on huge maps. I hope MW3 isn't like it.....

Avatar image for orb_03_2006
orb_03_2006

8494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 0

#2 orb_03_2006
Member since 2006 • 8494 Posts
They'll fix the servers in no time.
Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts

I am very dissapointed with BF3. Very laggy, gameplay is very difficult, only 24 players on huge maps. I hope MW3 isn't like it.....

gamingboss

I'm really quite the opposite. Very little lag, amazing maps, AWESOME-AWESOME-AWESOME! The 5 buds playing w/me last night all said the same thing. FYI, I'm having more problems with this forum, right now. Can't access my inbox. Very very sloooow.

Avatar image for javafriek
javafriek

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 javafriek
Member since 2008 • 752 Posts
I dont care for the small tight maps, the big open ones are what battlefield is all about. I am a little disappointed in the destructible environments...I thought there were gonna be some. There are more destructible environments in bf 1943.
Avatar image for HilbillyRokstar
HilbillyRokstar

3236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 HilbillyRokstar
Member since 2007 • 3236 Posts
I dont care for the small tight maps, the big open ones are what battlefield is all about. I am a little disappointed in the destructible environments...I thought there were gonna be some. There are more destructible environments in bf 1943.javafriek
What other series has had larger, more open maps , on console?
Avatar image for Zalcor
Zalcor

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Zalcor
Member since 2009 • 100 Posts

the game isn't nearly as good as when you have a full squad on Xbox Live with your friends, if you don't have enough playing BF3 you should add some of the people you play with who have mics so you guys can dominate the other team together, its an amazingly good time.

Avatar image for MickeyTheNinja
MickeyTheNinja

3824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MickeyTheNinja
Member since 2007 • 3824 Posts

I am very dissapointed with BF3. Very laggy, gameplay is very difficult, only 24 players on huge maps. I hope MW3 isn't like it.....

gamingboss
My game isn't laggy, I find the gameplay easy because bullets hit and kill people in BF compared to COD, and 24 players are a lot. More doesn't mean better. Maybe 30, but no more. So no, COD won't be like this. You'll have tiny maps with people running around corners shooting, and you'll have horrible hit detection so when you do fire, you'll fire a clip into someone before they die. And if they don't they'll turn around and shoot you once and you'll die. So just play COD "the greatest FPS" and then complain when it doesn't work, and praise when you go 15-5.
Avatar image for javafriek
javafriek

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 javafriek
Member since 2008 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="javafriek"]I dont care for the small tight maps, the big open ones are what battlefield is all about. I am a little disappointed in the destructible environments...I thought there were gonna be some. There are more destructible environments in bf 1943.HilbillyRokstar
What other series has had larger, more open maps , on console?

I'm not talking about the bigger maps on the game, it's the small maps that I dont like. When I'm playing those I feel like I'm playing cod.