I can't be the only one. I mean, I'm stoked for Infinite, it looks great, but its not Bioshock. Rapture is Bioshock, not some sky city. Honestly, they could have dropped Bioshock from Infinite's title, or gone with its original codename, Icarus, and it would have fit perfectly. I remember Bioshock was confirmed to be a trilogy a few years back, but 2's slightly underwhelming sales might have skewered that plan. I sure hope not, I would be disappointed if Infinite was officially the third part of the "trilogy". Rapture is among the greatest gaming environments ever, it can't be abandoned without one last take.
I just finished Bioshock 2 which is why I'm bringing up this topic now, and oh my god, what an experience. People say there's nowhere for the series to go, and that it should have ended with the original. I highly disagree. Yes, Rapture in its decayed state has been pretty fleshed out, to that I agree, but why not make a game from a different perspective? There are so many things I'd like to see a third and final entry in the underwater utopia do. If they want to do something that would keep the environment from losing its luster, let us play as a citizen when the civil war erupts, while things turn to chaos in the city. Give us an open world Rapture with factions based under Fontaine, Andrew Ryan and maybe even Sophia Lamb. Allow us to to choose who to do missions for, ultimately affecting the game's ending. Who else agrees that they would like to see this? That there should be one more entry in the Rapture series from a fresh perspective? I can't be the only one who doesn't want to see Rapture abandoned. An open world version set during the chaos, not after would be incredible, don't you think?
Log in to comment