Gamespot gives TimeShift a 6.5 / GameTrailers gives it an 8.2!

Click on the score for the full review.

I personally really like this game. To each their own.

Update:

Link to GT's HD Video Review..

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/27368.html

That's preety low, I was hoping that it would get atleast 7.5

I also liked the game, one of the games I'm planning to buy after Cod4, Assassins Creed, Kane & Lynch, and another 2/3 games.

From what I've seen of it, it's nothing but FEAR without the blood splatters, with worse graphics, and without the scare factor.Food_Nipple

Very wrong. The visuals are far better than FEAR. They're not amazing, but they're surely better.

Oh yeah, it's nothing like Fear, except for the slow mo.

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

Patriot298

As I said, Aaron Thomas strikes again. Every time I see a low score, I look to see if he reviewed it before trusting the score because if he did, you can count on it being the lowest score the game will ever recieve from a credible reviewer.

[QUOTE="Patriot298"]

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

Food_Nipple

As I said, Aaron Thomas strikes again. Every time I see a low score, I look to see if he reviewed it before trusting the score because if he did, you can count on it being the lowest score the game will ever recieve from a credible reviewer.

Dude, you do know that all of Gamespot contributes to the reviews, they dont just let one dude review games. :P I think it would be ludicrous if they did that.

[QUOTE="Food_Nipple"][QUOTE="Patriot298"]

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

TheGTAvaccine

As I said, Aaron Thomas strikes again. Every time I see a low score, I look to see if he reviewed it before trusting the score because if he did, you can count on it being the lowest score the game will ever recieve from a credible reviewer.

Dude, you do know that all of Gamespot contributes to the reviews, they dont just let one dude review games. :P I think it would be ludicrous if they did that.

reviews written by aaron thomas are written by aaron thomas and nobody else. reviews written by george washington are written by george washington and nobody else (except maybe his ghostwriter). "all of gamespot" does not contribute to the reviews - only the author of any particular article.

[QUOTE="Food_Nipple"][QUOTE="Patriot298"]

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

TheGTAvaccine

As I said, Aaron Thomas strikes again. Every time I see a low score, I look to see if he reviewed it before trusting the score because if he did, you can count on it being the lowest score the game will ever recieve from a credible reviewer.

Dude, you do know that all of Gamespot contributes to the reviews, they dont just let one dude review games. :P I think it would be ludicrous if they did that.

Well then you think Gamespot and just about every other revierwer out there is ludicrous. That's how it works everywhere.

I played the demo, and I thought it was a generic game with some neat features, so I cancelled my preorder. I initially had high hopesfor it :(Staryoshi87

That was a mistake. :( It's a good game.

ok wow .....

two worlds- 7.0 :|

halo 3- 9.5 :?

ratchet and clank 7.5 :?

ugh...

ok wow .....

two worlds- 7.0 :|

halo 3- 9.5 :?

ratchet and clank 7.5 :?

ugh...

outbreak201

The Two Worlds and Halo 3 scores are fair. Those games have flaws warenting the score deductions they got, but you are right about the Ratchet and Clank one.

From what I've seen of it, it's nothing but FEAR without the blood splatters, with worse graphics, and without the scare factor. Still, it did deserve a higher score.Food_Nipple

I thought the demo was enjoyable and i'm shocked at the 6.5. Oh well i might rent it first to see if i like it more. I will disagree with you about the graphics though. Timeshift is more polished and detailed in the graphical department than FEAR.

Game deserves no higher then a 7 IMOkozzy1234

It's easily an 8.0-8.5.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]Game deserves no higher then a 7 IMOBioShockOwnz

It's easily an 8.0-8.5.

Gamerankings.com = 74% :P

Guess thats right in between what we both think it should get:P

[QUOTE="Patriot298"]

The demo to this game was really awesome! I think the reviewer is an idiot!

Food_Nipple

As I said, Aaron Thomas strikes again. Every time I see a low score, I look to see if he reviewed it before trusting the score because if he did, you can count on it being the lowest score the game will ever recieve from a credible reviewer.

the problem with gamespot reviews are, they rate the game for everything but how fun the game it.

Thats why I like gametrailers and Ign better for reviews

6.5

Click on the score for the full review.

I personally really like this game. To each their own.

Update:

Link to GT's HD Video Review..

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/27368.html

BioShockOwnz