Gamespots ME2 Review - 9.0

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for simo98088
simo98088

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 simo98088
Member since 2003 • 927 Posts

Reviewed 9.0 by Gamespot.

Avatar image for simo98088
simo98088

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 simo98088
Member since 2003 • 927 Posts
http://au.gamespot.com/xbox360/rpg/masseffect2workingtitle/video/6246912/mass-effect-2-video-review
Avatar image for gillri
gillri

5926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 gillri
Member since 2004 • 5926 Posts

I was sure it was a dead cert for a 9.5, oh well the critic score will be around 9.4/9.5 thats what I pay attnetion too and thats one hell of a score

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#4 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
well it did better than mass effect 1 :P
Avatar image for simo98088
simo98088

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 simo98088
Member since 2003 • 927 Posts
From what the review said of how much of an improvement it had made over the first.. i would have thought it have scored more then 0.5 points more then ME1..
Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#6 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts
[QUOTE="simo98088"]From what the review said of how much of an improvement it had made over the first.. i would have thought it have scored more then 0.5 points more then ME1..

It has also been over two years since Mass Effect. That's why if a sequel comes out four years later even if it improves on the first game it will likely get a lower score.
Avatar image for Hakud0ushi
Hakud0ushi

7613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Hakud0ushi
Member since 2005 • 7613 Posts
The game is so much better the first one. Just epic. Candidate to GOTY without a doubt.
Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#8 raahsnavj
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts
He pointed out there wasn't anything wrong with the game and hardly worth deducting any points... "A few blemishes prove that this planned trilogy still has potential for growth, but they barely diminish the game's overall impact." - barely, as in one full point.

The only two negatives: 1) scanning mini-game got boring... ok. I read that as, "more exploration than I wanted to do. Should have been a shorter game unless they were going to add in some more variety." 2) some glitches and bugs; #2 didn't hurt the other 10/10 game in recent memory and he doesn't explain why it is any worse in this one... But who really cares. These scores rarely mean much in the level of enjoyment I get out of games. My CE copy is already on the delivery truck to my house so I'm looking forward to playing it and enjoying it for myself.
Avatar image for DamianAlexander
DamianAlexander

3762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DamianAlexander
Member since 2008 • 3762 Posts

My God, a Gamespot review that's actually on time? I'm shocked. I'll have to watch it now.

Avatar image for Witchsight
Witchsight

12145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Witchsight
Member since 2004 • 12145 Posts
Twas as i expected.
Avatar image for chex81
chex81

3661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 0

#11 chex81
Member since 2004 • 3661 Posts

He pointed out there wasn't anything wrong with the game and hardly worth deducting any points... "A few blemishes prove that this planned trilogy still has potential for growth, but they barely diminish the game's overall impact." - barely, as in one full point.

The only two negatives: 1) scanning mini-game got boring... ok. I read that as, "more exploration than I wanted to do. Should have been a shorter game unless they were going to add in some more variety." 2) some glitches and bugs; #2 didn't hurt the other 10/10 game in recent memory and he doesn't explain why it is any worse in this one... But who really cares. These scores rarely mean much in the level of enjoyment I get out of games. My CE copy is already on the delivery truck to my house so I'm looking forward to playing it and enjoying it for myself.raahsnavj

i just read the review and i'm currently wondering the exact same thing. The content of the review leans more towards a 9.5 than a 9, oh well. As for his #2 complaint, tons of great games were launched with bigs or glitches yet still recieved a 10? I don't understand.

Either way it doesn't really matter...i'm buying the game and im sure ill be blown away.

Avatar image for Doomtime
Doomtime

4282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Doomtime
Member since 2004 • 4282 Posts
[QUOTE="simo98088"]From what the review said of how much of an improvement it had made over the first.. i would have thought it have scored more then 0.5 points more then ME1..

it's just a number. Hope this doesn't cause you to lose any sleep.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

I was sure it was a dead cert for a 9.5, oh well the critic score will be around 9.4/9.5 thats what I pay attnetion too and thats one hell of a score

gillri
Reviewer is KVO, no 9.5 for 360 :P
Avatar image for HelpItPlease
HelpItPlease

589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 HelpItPlease
Member since 2006 • 589 Posts

I don't get how a game like this doesn't get a perfect 10. Ok it has a few minor bugs, none that i've run into so far, but this is for me a once in a decade sort of game. First of all, the innovation in carrying over your character and having the choices you made in the 1st game affect little story lines just give the game such an authenticity that cant be found anywhere else. And 1 hour in *SPOILER ALERT!!!................... when joker appears and you get the normandy back.............

I got chills down my spine. This is such an epic game and i cant put it down, been playing for 7 hours now it's that good.

Avatar image for doubalfa
doubalfa

7108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 30

#15 doubalfa
Member since 2006 • 7108 Posts
well I dont know how todays standars are managed, btu seemes like the game ratings are from 8 to 10, anything lower is considered garbage, and most of the time the worst games get at least a 6
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
well I dont know how todays standars are managed, btu seemes like the game ratings are from 8 to 10, anything lower is considered garbage, and most of the time the worst games get at least a 6doubalfa
Which is stupid. Game sites need to start using the full 1-10 range.
Avatar image for doubalfa
doubalfa

7108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 30

#17 doubalfa
Member since 2006 • 7108 Posts
yeah that was exactly my point, I'd say that by today standards a 8 game is really a 6-7 game and so on,
Avatar image for Kevin-V
Kevin-V

5418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#18 Kevin-V
Member since 2006 • 5418 Posts

[QUOTE="doubalfa"]well I dont know how todays standars are managed, btu seemes like the game ratings are from 8 to 10, anything lower is considered garbage, and most of the time the worst games get at least a 6SaltyMeatballs
Which is stupid. Game sites need to start using the full 1-10 range.

Which is exactly what we do. So far this year, I have given out two 4.0's, a 6.5, and a 9! I sincerely hope no thinking person approaches a sub-8 score at GameSpot thinking that the game is garbage, because if you do, you are missing out on some games you'll probably enjoy. (A 7 on GameSpot means, by definition, "good."

As for Mass Effect 2, I made this point elsewhere, and have made it dozens of times over the years, but it always seems to be worth repeating to those that don't know how this site's standards work (you can click the help link at the top of the page for more information on our reviews scale) or gripe that a game they enjoy didn't get an eleventy-bajillionty. That is this: A 9 on GameSpot, as has always been the case, indicates a special and extraordinary game. The scoring process isn't like grading a school paper; we don't start at a 10 and start subtracting points. Can you imagine such a terrible approach to critical evaluation?


A 9 is cause for celebration--the indicator of a special game that will thrill almost anyone that plays it. That is exactly what Mass Effect 2 is. This is a superb game that had room for improvement. If I didn't acknowledge its flaws, I wouldn't be a critic. I have to be conscious of what the genre and platform are capable of. Dragon Age and Fallout 3, along with an entire decade of incredible RPGs before them, are more complex and longer-lasting experiences than Mass Effect 2, for example. Mass Effect 2 is relatively short by RPG standards, and its character progression isn't nearly on par with a game like Dragon Age.

In other words, Mass Effect 2 is an awesome game, that like other awesome games, still had possibilities for further growth. But spending so much time writing more about Mass Effect 2 seems rather silly, considering I've already written close to 2400 words already in the review! I remember as a GS reader when a game got an 8; that was considered a triumph, because it meant a game was great. A 9 was a real achievement, something to make you giddy. And so it is now. If you are looking at a "9" and complaining that it wasn't higher, you may want to rethink your approach. Like other 9's we have given in our history, Mass Effect 2 is a superb game that's easy to fall in love with. There are other publications that hand out 9s so often that they've sucked out the "special" that such a score should really mean. A 9 here means something more.

Also: Hi!

Avatar image for RedReckoning
RedReckoning

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 RedReckoning
Member since 2009 • 638 Posts

^ this. I agree with this :P

Avatar image for Dordledum
Dordledum

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Dordledum
Member since 2009 • 1754 Posts

Also: Hi!

Kevin-V

Well said, hi to you too!

:)

Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#21 raahsnavj
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="doubalfa"]well I dont know how todays standars are managed, btu seemes like the game ratings are from 8 to 10, anything lower is considered garbage, and most of the time the worst games get at least a 6Kevin-V

Which is stupid. Game sites need to start using the full 1-10 range.

Which is exactly what we do. So far this year, I have given out two 4.0's, a 6.5, and a 9! I sincerely hope no thinking person approaches a sub-8 score at GameSpot thinking that the game is garbage, because if you do, you are missing out on some games you'll probably enjoy. (A 7 on GameSpot means, by definition, "good."As for Mass Effect 2, I made this point elsewhere, and have made it dozens of times over the years, but it always seems to be worth repeating to those that don't know how this site's standards work (you can click the help link at the top of the page for more information on our reviews scale) or gripe that a game they enjoy didn't get an eleventy-bajillionty. That is this: A 9 on GameSpot, as has always been the case, indicates a special and extraordinary game. The scoring process isn't like grading a school paper; we don't start at a 10 and start subtracting points. Can you imagine such a terrible approach to critical evaluation?

A 9 is cause for celebration--the indicator of a special game that will thrill almost anyone that plays it. That is exactly what Mass Effect 2 is. This is a superb game that had room for improvement. If I didn't acknowledge its flaws, I wouldn't be a critic. I have to be conscious of what the genre and platform are capable of. Dragon Age and Fallout 3, along with an entire decade of incredible RPGs before them, are more complex and longer-lasting experiences than Mass Effect 2, for example. Mass Effect 2 is relatively short by RPG standards, and its character progression isn't nearly on par with a game like Dragon Age.In other words, Mass Effect 2 is an awesome game, that like other awesome games, still had possibilities for further growth. But spending so much time writing more about Mass Effect 2 seems rather silly, considering I've already written close to 2400 words already in the review! I remember as a GS reader when a game got an 8; that was considered a triumph, because it meant a game was great. A 9 was a real achievement, something to make you giddy. And so it is now. If you are looking at a "9" and complaining that it wasn't higher, you may want to rethink your approach. Like other 9's we have given in our history, Mass Effect 2 is a superb game that's easy to fall in love with. There are other publications that hand out 9s so often that they've sucked out the "special" that such a score should really mean. A 9 here means something more.Also: Hi!

So what made it a 9 and not a 10? What made it a 9 and not an 8? From your review I can't tell. And you clarification here you pointed out a 'Superb game that had room for improvement'. Does that mean GTA 4 had no room for improvement? is that what makes a 10? And a good game (or 8 ) what makes it less than a 9? I'm not complaining about the review, more about the number system and the grading in general. You have so many numbers and no measurable criteria to any of them... well, at least that is what it appears to the end user (or at least me). You have attached some simple words to them to try and sort that out for us but I see no reason a 9.5 exists if that is also 'Superb'. So why bother with the 9? why bother with the 8? Why not just use the terms? Then at least we only have 10 values. It is rare that games are going to really release with a 1-4 score... maybe some will that you review... but why not just call those one term and group them because they are so hard to come by and give more granularity in the scores (or terms) that seem to be a-dime a dozen these days (7.5+)... to do so would give back the 1-10 scale and appear less a 5-10 scale. I have to agree with you that other places hand out so many 9's they have sucked the special out of it. Personally though I think it is worse than that. I think there have been so many 7.5+ (here and elsewhere) that the top half of the scale has the whole 'special' sucked out of it, and having no objectionable criteria to rank against what is the point of the metric at all?
Avatar image for Hickamie14
Hickamie14

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#22 Hickamie14
Member since 2007 • 1652 Posts

Reviewed 9.0 by Gamespot.

simo98088
I'm very surprised. I thought it was going to score a 9.5 for sure. Especially since just about every other web site gave it a very high score.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Nothing wrong with a 7. :P
Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
In my personal opinion, a 9.0 is a slap in the face. Mass Effect 2 is amazing in every aspect. So much heart, sweat, and tears were put in this game and it shows. A score of 9.0 is ridiculous to say the least, which is an understatement. I score it 9.6 minimum. Brilliant game.
Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#25 raahsnavj
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts
In my personal opinion, a 9.0 is a slap in the face. Mass Effect 2 is amazing in every aspect. So much heart, sweat, and tears were put in this game and it shows. A score of 9.0 is ridiculous to say the least, which is an understatement. I score it 9.6 minimum. Brilliant game.Elian2530
What does .6 give the game? I find it hilarious to for people to say a game is worth .5 or .6 points more 'clearly!'... what is the difference between a those .6 points? Why not call it "superb" and let that mean 9.9 if you would like it to? From what I could tell Kevin was saying is that is what the 9 really means anyhow is Superb... why bother with the 9 or 9.5 (or 9.6 in this case)?
Avatar image for Kevin-V
Kevin-V

5418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#26 Kevin-V
Member since 2006 • 5418 Posts

[QUOTE="Hickamie14"][QUOTE="simo98088"]

Reviewed 9.0 by Gamespot.

Elian2530

I'm very surprised. I thought it was going to score a 9.5 for sure. Especially since just about every other web site gave it a very high score.

On GS, that is exactly what 9.0 is on GameSpot: A very high score. We don't adhere to the scales used by other publications. We adhere to our own.
So what made it a 9 and not a 10? What made it a 9 and not an 8? From your review I can't tell. And you clarification here you pointed out a 'Superb game that had room for improvement'. Does that mean GTA 4 had no room for improvement? is that what makes a 10? And a good game (or 8 ) what makes it less than a 9? raahsnavj
This is the kind of metaphysical offering that's hard to argue in an Internet forum! I think we made an incredibly good case for GTA4 being a 10, but even if you don't agree with that assessment, I will say this: We have given out only six 10s in our entire history. Clearly, we don't go around handing out such high scores without being certain of our evaluation. But GTA4 isn't Mass Effect 2. I reviewed Mass Effect 2 based on its own merits, not based on those of GTA.

Regardless, our approach to reviews is clearly explained in our reviews guidelines, which you can read by clicking the help button at the top of every page. The philosophy and scale explained there has served us well, and it is to that scale that we adhere. Mass Effect is a wonderful example of a game that fits the 9 category quite comfortably, and the text and tone of the written review are consistent with that of other 9-range games.

But again, the review speaks for itself. Getting hung up on a score that says "you must play this game!" seems absolutely silly to me.

Avatar image for Kevin-V
Kevin-V

5418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#27 Kevin-V
Member since 2006 • 5418 Posts
In my personal opinion, a 9.0 is a slap in the face. Mass Effect 2 is amazing in every aspect. So much heart, sweat, and tears were put in this game and it shows. A score of 9.0 is ridiculous to say the least, which is an understatement. I score it 9.6 minimum. Brilliant game.Elian2530
Yes. Calling a game "superb" is the equivalent of injuring you. This seems a sensible approach. How dare I call Mass Effect 2 superb and give it a score that makes it a likely Game of the Year candidate! What was I thinking???? ;)
Avatar image for bigboss5ak
bigboss5ak

2962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 bigboss5ak
Member since 2007 • 2962 Posts
Hmm i think i can understand why he gave it a 9 and not a 9.5 which everyone is saying it should have gotten. Though ME2 is a great game it may be very short in terms of rpg standards and could have improved upon that also with the leveling and inventory system. Im a big fan of dragon age along with its game length and its character development, if ME2 could have improved upon those aspects but did not i can fully understand its criticism. Either way im sure its a game many will enjoy including myself.
Avatar image for Darkslayer16
Darkslayer16

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Darkslayer16
Member since 2006 • 3619 Posts

In my personal opinion, a 9.0 is a slap in the face. Mass Effect 2 is amazing in every aspect. So much heart, sweat, and tears were put in this game and it shows. A score of 9.0 is ridiculous to say the least, which is an understatement. I score it 9.6 minimum. Brilliant game.Elian2530

It's not amazing in every aspect and has a fair bit of problems.. also you can't give it a 9.6 when the rating system that always ends in a .5 or .0

Avatar image for yokofox33
yokofox33

30775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 yokofox33
Member since 2004 • 30775 Posts

Really nice score. Can't wait to get this game!

Avatar image for Sik_kid_pk
Sik_kid_pk

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Sik_kid_pk
Member since 2010 • 549 Posts
i wish they still did the 9.4s and 8.2s and stuff. it seems like everything gets a 9 lol
Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#32 raahsnavj
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts
[QUOTE="Kevin-V"] [QUOTE="raahsnavj"] So what made it a 9 and not a 10? What made it a 9 and not an 8? From your review I can't tell. And you clarification here you pointed out a 'Superb game that had room for improvement'. Does that mean GTA 4 had no room for improvement? is that what makes a 10? And a good game (or 8 ) what makes it less than a 9?

This is the kind of metaphysical offering that's hard to argue in an Internet forum! I think we made an incredibly good case for GTA4 being a 10, but even if you don't agree with that assessment, I will say this: We have given out only six 10s in our entire history. But GTA4 isn't Mass Effect 2. I reviews Mass Effect 2 based on its own merits, not based on those of GTA. Regardless, our approach to reviews is clearly explained in our reviews guidelines, which you can read by clicking the help button at the top of every page. The philosophy and scale explained there has served us well, and it is to that scale that we adhere. Mass Effect is a wonderful example of a game that fits the 9 category quite comfortably, and the text and tone of the written review are consistent with that of other 9-range games. But again, the review speaks for itself. Getting hung up on a score that says "you must play this game!" seems absolutely silly to me.

Exactly. The score is pointless. I assume you keep them around so we can compare them to other publications or something then? They clearly don't mean anything here other than the brief named descriptions anyhow. (well other than to help pad out system wars talk with fodder) Sorry, I already swore off these whole number debates because I have come to the conclusion the numbers are pointless. I find many of the 9+ games not wothy of a play-through, and some of the 7-8s are because they fit my tastes better. When I read the text it usually outlines the styles and gameplay types well enough that know it is for me or not. I should just take my own advice and forget I read the score at all seeming the review text did seem to express the overall opinion of the game well enough. Now I just have to play my copy and see if I agree or not.
Avatar image for DJ_Magneto
DJ_Magneto

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DJ_Magneto
Member since 2008 • 4675 Posts
Bravo to Kevin for coming here to defend his review. We don't see that often enough. I think it's quite rediculous how so many people get so emotionally charged up on debating fractions of a point in a review score. It ends up turning into a critique of the critic rather than the game, which is what we should be paying our attention to anyway.
Avatar image for Optical_Order
Optical_Order

5100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Optical_Order
Member since 2008 • 5100 Posts

you post like a robot...

Avatar image for BIO_Symbol
BIO_Symbol

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 BIO_Symbol
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

In other words, Mass Effect 2 is an awesome game, that like other awesome games, still had possibilities for further growth

Kevin-V
Note to self: Kevin wants 3 discs for ME3 ;-) I'll pass that onto the team.
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

man im about an hour into the game so far and i have to say im blown away it surpasses ME1 in every aspect it literally blows it out the water. They actually managed to make the graphics look even better and the combat is silky smooth unlike the first. The story so far is suerb and the delivery is amazing. To write just how much better everything is would take to long. Id say so far this game deserves a 9.5 and is going down in my book as one the greatest games of all time.

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#37 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts

[QUOTE="Elian2530"]In my personal opinion, a 9.0 is a slap in the face. Mass Effect 2 is amazing in every aspect. So much heart, sweat, and tears were put in this game and it shows. A score of 9.0 is ridiculous to say the least, which is an understatement. I score it 9.6 minimum. Brilliant game.Darkslayer16


It's not amazing in every aspect and has a fair bit of problems.. also you can't give it a 9.6 when the rating system that always ends in a .5 or .0

You're right. I'm thinking IGN scoring when I typed this. I meant to say 9.5. I dont know. To me, 9.0 and 9.5 is a big difference even if they both qualify as "Superb." I thought it was superb+.

Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts
This game deserves a way better score than 9.0 on ign it was 9.6 and the only reason they said it did not get a 10 was because of the load your saved game they said if players did not play the first they were gonna be missing out which to me is a stupid ass reason for them to deny the game a 10 . still in all this game is great love it my personal score would have to agree with Ign with the 9.6 it does suffer some small glitches and when i mean small i mean microscopic glitches .
Avatar image for HeavenIceDay
HeavenIceDay

798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 HeavenIceDay
Member since 2004 • 798 Posts

Very good score and Game Emblems. Can't wait to play it

Avatar image for Doomtime
Doomtime

4282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Doomtime
Member since 2004 • 4282 Posts
I hope all the people whining care about math as a subject in school as much as they care about a review score on a video game.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

I have no idea on the process and how they pick and choose a "number" to give games, all I know that reviews are positive for this awesome game.

Avatar image for guitardude1243
guitardude1243

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 guitardude1243
Member since 2008 • 647 Posts

If you want the truth, then play the game. Nobody at Gamespot can make you decide what a good game is and what is not. I think handing a 10 over to GTA: IV shows an incredible lack of credibility, but that's MY opinion and it doesn't matter too much compared to yours or theirs for that matter.

Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
When a nine isn't good enough, you know something is wrong with gamers today. Gamespot is saying this is a must play game you should absolutely buy and will likely love, and people are like "Oh man just a nine oh blah bloo blah Gamespot underrating it to look edgy blah bloo".
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

I don't have complaints on the review but on how they review it. On other sites like IGN and GT, they show you the scores for Story, Graphics, Gameplay and so on and it averages out the overall score. Here, we have no idea how they choose the number for the games they reviewed. It's like they can praise the heck out of a game but gives it an 8 or lower, or do the reverse and talk more negative than positive but gives it a 10. Who knows, all I know is ME2 got great reviews. Awesome GS score and review.

Avatar image for good_sk8er7
good_sk8er7

4327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#45 good_sk8er7
Member since 2009 • 4327 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="doubalfa"]well I dont know how todays standars are managed, btu seemes like the game ratings are from 8 to 10, anything lower is considered garbage, and most of the time the worst games get at least a 6Kevin-V

Which is stupid. Game sites need to start using the full 1-10 range.

Which is exactly what we do. So far this year, I have given out two 4.0's, a 6.5, and a 9! I sincerely hope no thinking person approaches a sub-8 score at GameSpot thinking that the game is garbage, because if you do, you are missing out on some games you'll probably enjoy. (A 7 on GameSpot means, by definition, "good."

As for Mass Effect 2, I made this point elsewhere, and have made it dozens of times over the years, but it always seems to be worth repeating to those that don't know how this site's standards work (you can click the help link at the top of the page for more information on our reviews scale) or gripe that a game they enjoy didn't get an eleventy-bajillionty. That is this: A 9 on GameSpot, as has always been the case, indicates a special and extraordinary game. The scoring process isn't like grading a school paper; we don't start at a 10 and start subtracting points. Can you imagine such a terrible approach to critical evaluation?


A 9 is cause for celebration--the indicator of a special game that will thrill almost anyone that plays it. That is exactly what Mass Effect 2 is. This is a superb game that had room for improvement. If I didn't acknowledge its flaws, I wouldn't be a critic. I have to be conscious of what the genre and platform are capable of. Dragon Age and Fallout 3, along with an entire decade of incredible RPGs before them, are more complex and longer-lasting experiences than Mass Effect 2, for example. Mass Effect 2 is relatively short by RPG standards, and its character progression isn't nearly on par with a game like Dragon Age.

In other words, Mass Effect 2 is an awesome game, that like other awesome games, still had possibilities for further growth. But spending so much time writing more about Mass Effect 2 seems rather silly, considering I've already written close to 2400 words already in the review! I remember as a GS reader when a game got an 8; that was considered a triumph, because it meant a game was great. A 9 was a real achievement, something to make you giddy. And so it is now. If you are looking at a "9" and complaining that it wasn't higher, you may want to rethink your approach. Like other 9's we have given in our history, Mass Effect 2 is a superb game that's easy to fall in love with. There are other publications that hand out 9s so often that they've sucked out the "special" that such a score should really mean. A 9 here means something more.

Also: Hi!

Well said, well said. And also; Hello!!!! :)

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#46 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

I don't have complaints on the review but on how they review it. On other sites like IGN and GT, they show you the scores for Story, Graphics, Gameplay and so on and it averages out the overall score. Here, we have no idea how they choose the number for the games they reviewed. It's like they can praise the heck out of a game but gives it an 8 or lower, or do the reverse and talk more negative than positive but gives it a 10. Who knows, all I know is ME2 got great reviews. Awesome GS score and review.

gago-gago
they use to, on every writte review there were catagories and the number was the average of those catagories. Then for some reason (to this day i cannot figure out why) they stopped doing it and started using only 0.5 increments. To be honest, i hate it
Avatar image for Metal-Recon
Metal-Recon

823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Metal-Recon
Member since 2003 • 823 Posts

You guys are whining for nothing... I can understand the reviewer's score but before I explain why remember that if you don't like the score handed to the game and you think it should have been better or worse, you can give it your own score right here in Gamespot and they show it to other readers... you rate games based on reasons they don't and you look at it in a way they don't necessarily do... just remember that

Now back on the main topic, is as simple as this: YES he is saying it is a great game and it seems like it's indeed a great game, story wise and stuff.... NOW, based on genre (RPG) it lacks in some departments... Take it this way to see if you guys understand it: Mass effect is a great game, has great story and gameplay and stuff BUT to RPG standards it lacks in some departments compared to others that could have been developed in better ways... nonetheless this is not such a big issue overall, hence they give it a 9 and not a 9.5.

It is not only about story and gameplay, they have to overlook what genre the game is based on so they can give a proper review... It's as simple as that

Avatar image for doubalfa
doubalfa

7108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 30

#49 doubalfa
Member since 2006 • 7108 Posts
to finish the point your opinion on Mass Effect 2, is what really matters, the shininh nine, is where it sets in a scale which ranges from awful to beatiful, either way the first mass effect scored something around 8 and it was one of my all time favorites
Avatar image for mattllv
mattllv

224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 mattllv
Member since 2007 • 224 Posts

Thanks Kevin. I thought the review was very informative. I agree with a post above, I think more critics should take part in the forums. I think more game publishers and production companies should do the same.

I was on the fence before reading the review, but I will be stopping by my local game store on the way home to pick it up today, that is, if it's still in stock!