gears of war vs halo 3 overall which is better

my opinion:

Graphics- Gears

Gameplay- Gears

multiplayer- Halo

Sound- Gears

Characters- Gears

Weapons- Halo

Vehicles- Halo

Overall- Gears of War give me your opinion.

Go back to system wars Metallicafan

I'd pick Halo simply for the MP but of course anyone with a 360 and a brain would buy both

myself, ive always liked gears. simply because gears of war is tactical and it takes a brain to play, on the other hand where we have halo where you charge at eachother with assault rifles and its pretty much whose going to hit melee first cuz thats where the fight ends. the game is pure luck.

im sorry man,but i played em both,and they do suck,im just sayin play a real fun game,ssbb,u will thank memetallicafan14

I have SSBB it's a great game but it's not as fun as those two games. Anyway i'd choose Halo 3 i've been a fan since the first and i've played all of the halo games. Just matters what i'm in the mood for the bloodiness of gears is just so amazing!

You forgot to add

Story - Halo

and

Intensity - Gears

halo u can change every option

what ppl start with, where they start, spawn times, or set lives limit

how much health,

where weapons and what kind and how frequent they spawn

player movment

gravitiy

and so on......

my opinion:

Graphics- Gears

Gameplay- Gears

multiplayer- Halo

Sound- Gears

Characters- Gears

Weapons- Halo

Vehicles- Halo

Overall- Gears of War give me your opinion.

TheBurgerKing2

Graphics: GeoW duh

Gameplay: GeoW

MP: Halo

Sound: GeoW

Characters: GeoW (Cole Train baby!)

Weapons: GeoW (chainsaw!)

Vehicles: Halo duh

Overall: I prefer Gears but will play either gladly...

my opinion:

Graphics- Gears

Gameplay- Gears

multiplayer- Halo

Sound- Gears

Characters- Gears

Weapons- Halo

Vehicles- Halo

Overall- Gears of War give me your opinion.

TheBurgerKing2

I gotta go with Gears. I actually enjoy the MP more in Gears than in H3. I don't know it just seems to take more skill. GoW isn't as n00b friendly.

I gotta go with Gears. I actually enjoy the MP more in Gears than in H3. I don't know it just seems to take more skill. GoW isn't as n00b friendly.

TheOnlyValius

[QUOTE="TheOnlyValius"]

I gotta go with Gears. I actually enjoy the MP more in Gears than in H3. I don't know it just seems to take more skill. GoW isn't as n00b friendly.

zero9167

Never had a problem with Host advantage and never was host.

weapons:Halo

Graphics:Halo

Story:Gears(Halo story=dumb)

Multiplayer:Halo

Intensity:Gears

Characters:Gears

Cant put in vehicles because Gears has none except the thing that killed the Kryll

Graphics- Tie (Gears- characters..shiny. Halo- texutes, environments, water physics)

Gameplay- Gears

Multiplayer- Gears (it just feels way more satisfying to snipe someone in gears rather than halo, and the whole "revive your team mates" is pretty awsome.

Sound- Gears (the sounds the locust make are sick)

Characters- Halo

Weapons- Halo (a lot of variety)

Vehicles- Halo (obviously)

Overall- Although the two games are neck and neck with a lot of the features (imo) Gears has a slight edge due to its MP and "pretty looks".

If a gun was pointed at my head and I had to chose one I would go with Gears of Halo obviously. J/K

Too close for me to pick. Just depends on what I feel like that day

Graphics- Gears

Gameplay- Gears

Multiplayer- Gears

Sound- Gears

Characters- Gears

Weapons- Gear

Gears of war!

myself, ive always liked gears. simply because gears of war is tactical and it takes a brain to play, on the other hand where we have halo where you charge at eachother with assault rifles and its pretty much whose going to hit melee first cuz thats where the fight ends. the game is pure luck.

CBKING1

gears of war doesnt take a brain to play, it takes LUCK. AND ONLY LUCK.

shotgun x factor says HI.

crabwalking says hi.

sniper active reload says hi.

host advantage says hi.

if your 4 friends i listed were fixed, then i could say gears takes a brain, and was a tactical multiplayer experience. but in reality, all gears multiplayer is, is active reload snipers downing everyone, shotgun dances until someone gets a lucky shot, and an invincible host with bullets that hit the way they are intended, and all clients with rubber bullets.

anyone that calls gears "tactical" needs to play gears more online.

[QUOTE="CBKING1"]

myself, ive always liked gears. simply because gears of war is tactical and it takes a brain to play, on the other hand where we have halo where you charge at eachother with assault rifles and its pretty much whose going to hit melee first cuz thats where the fight ends. the game is pure luck.

gearsofhalogeek

gears of war doesnt take a brain to play, it takes LUCK. AND ONLY LUCK.

shotgun x factor says HI.

crabwalking says hi.

sniper active reload says hi.

host advantage says hi.

if your 4 friends i listed were fixed, then i could say gears takes a brain, and was a tactical multiplayer experience. but in reality, all gears multiplayer is, is active reload snipers downing everyone, shotgun dances until someone gets a lucky shot, and an invincible host with bullets that hit the way they are intended, and all clients with rubber bullets.

anyone that calls gears "tactical" needs to play gears more online.

[QUOTE="CBKING1"]

myself, ive always liked gears. simply because gears of war is tactical and it takes a brain to play, on the other hand where we have halo where you charge at eachother with assault rifles and its pretty much whose going to hit melee first cuz thats where the fight ends. the game is pure luck.

gearsofhalogeek

gears of war doesnt take a brain to play, it takes LUCK. AND ONLY LUCK.

shotgun x factor says HI.

crabwalking says hi.

sniper active reload says hi.

host advantage says hi.

if your 4 friends i listed were fixed, then i could say gears takes a brain, and was a tactical multiplayer experience. but in reality, all gears multiplayer is, is active reload snipers downing everyone, shotgun dances until someone gets a lucky shot, and an invincible host with bullets that hit the way they are intended, and all clients with rubber bullets.

anyone that calls gears "tactical" needs to play gears more online.

Ok so tell me which games are tactical?

ok:

any game thats not gears of war

halo isnt tactical, but its more tactical than gears,

rainbow six

army of two (even though it sucked)

graw 1 and 2

as i said basically any game that doesnt replace SKILL with LUCK

ok:

any game thats not gears of war

halo isnt tactical, but its more tactical than gears,

rainbow six

army of two (even though it sucked)

graw 1 and 2

as i said basically any game that doesnt replace SKILL with LUCK

gearsofhalogeek

Halo is not more tactical then gears you said halo is not tactical then how can it be more tactical then gears?

your an idiot in gears if you just rush in. halo if you rush in and get hit then youll be like "ok it doesnt make much of a difference" in gears of war you cant cuz it will change the whole game the second somebody gets killed. and yes halo is luck because if it wasnt then the game would be more than a bunch of people jumping and using melee. now tell me im wrong but what percentage of deaths come from a melee in that game? try 99%

my opinion:

Graphics- Gears

Gameplay- Gears

multiplayer- Halo

Sound- Gears

Characters- Gears

Weapons- Halo

Vehicles- Halo

Overall- Gears of War give me your opinion.

TheBurgerKing2

I agree with all of those except Halo needs a chainsaw gun.

you really must be an idiot if you think i really mean 99% but yeah it does happen majority of the time. the game is square off with somebody run at him and whoever hits B 1st is your winner.CBKING1

They fixed the melee.. Not to mention not all people charge and melee people. That's like saying all people do in Gears is run around chainsawing people.

Thank you for backing me up. I appreciate it. :)Lance_Kalzas

You're welcome i just don't like it when people say all people do is melee. I rarely melee i prefer medium and long range fighting in halo. I avoid getting extremely close cause it gets boring running around in circles trying to hit the guy lol.

wow. thats all i gotta say. yeah i read ur post and u said, o know gaylo doesnt involve alot of meleeing and its tactical if you make it that way. yeah sure ur melee percentage might be low, but thats 1. i stopped playing the game because it was stupid, and i no, im not a run and gunner. also the fact you can run out into the battlefeild with a sniper that shoots crazy fast, and for the most part, you dont even need to scope. because thats snipers act. WRONG!

and for you run and gunners, you guys wouldnt get owned by an active reload if you took cover, thats why gears made that cover system, a little more realistic dont you think? last time i checked, somebody should be dead from 1 sniper shot. yeah i know it takes 2 in gears but when getting ready for the second shot, their at least on their knees. that makes a hell of a lot more sense than getting shot then jumping in the air 50 feet.

wow. thats all i gotta say. yeah i read ur post and u said, o know gaylo doesnt involve alot of meleeing and its tactical if you make it that way. yeah sure ur melee percentage might be low, but thats 1. i stopped playing the game because it was stupid, and i no, im not a run and gunner. also the fact you can run out into the battlefeild with a sniper that shoots crazy fast, and for the most part, you dont even need to scope. because thats snipers act. WRONG!

and for you run and gunners, you guys wouldnt get owned by an active reload if you took cover, thats why gears made that cover system, a little more realistic dont you think? last time i checked, somebody should be dead from 1 sniper shot. yeah i know it takes 2 in gears but when getting ready for the second shot, their at least on their knees. that makes a hell of a lot more sense than getting shot then jumping in the air 50 feet.

CBKING1