Halo Reach- Inconsistent Reviews!!!

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ms555
ms555

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 ms555
Member since 2007 • 2665 Posts

The reviews have come in so far, and they are strange to say the least. I am not going to attack their personal opionions, but I will point out how strangve it is that they say Halo Reach is the best Halo game ever, then give it the lowest review scores of all four games. I find it strange how they call the campaing deep and say how the online puts other games to shame, then give it lower reviews than modern warfare 2!! I love how they are nitpicking the tiniest details that may possibly be not so perfect and call it justice to give it a 90?! Too many features is a problem? Hopw about how one reviewer says it is a plethora of goodies while another complains it lacks enough maps and how forge is pointless and firefight is just transferred from ODST. How one reviewer says the campaign is 12 hours while another complains how much he hated the five hour campaign.

I have never seen reviews be so inconsistent ever! None of them can agree on something, seriously! It seems that they were reallyh afraid to be accused of giving biased reviews, so they made it as brutal as possible. While if a 93 on metacritic is as brutal as they could get, that is still saying something. This game is still top notch!

Avatar image for Drakebunny
Drakebunny

3029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Drakebunny
Member since 2008 • 3029 Posts

Bioshock 1 scored higher then Reach btw.

Anyway, the score doesn't really matter. If you buy it & like it, great. "Professional opinions" aren't always the best.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Avatar image for iano-87
iano-87

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 iano-87
Member since 2010 • 685 Posts

Who cares about meta critic? Means nothing really. Just read reviews from sites and reviewers you know and trust so you will have a better idea of how good a game is before you play it.

Avatar image for ironman388
ironman388

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ironman388
Member since 2006 • 1454 Posts

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Phoenix534

he's saying their opinions aren't consistent with the scores they are giving the game. its like saying deus ex is the best game ever (which it is), then giving it a lower score than metal gear solid indicating the metal gear solid is in fact a better game.

Avatar image for ms555
ms555

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 ms555
Member since 2007 • 2665 Posts

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Phoenix534
geez, do you read anything or do you just judge topics by there covers, go into your bag of overused comebacks and sayings, and spit it out there? I said i am not criticizing their opinions, i am pointing out how weird it is that the reviews disagree with each other so much. Thecritic opinions for this game are more varied than many blockbusters i have ever seen reviewed.
Avatar image for twi41
twi41

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 twi41
Member since 2002 • 2471 Posts
You should remember that these reviews are based for the time that the game was released. A 9.0 game a few years ago may not hold up over time due to innovations by similar games.
Avatar image for ImprovedMind
ImprovedMind

738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ImprovedMind
Member since 2010 • 738 Posts

It's called attention for monetary reasons. Halo Reach is a 9.5+ game and there is no question about it. But, if a site gives it 8.0 you will click the link to the review because it stands out from the ordinary. Many other users will do this too since they are intrigued by the irregularity. Now, each user that visits the site will load advertisements and generate revenue for the owners of the site. So by performing the action of giving Halo Reach an absurdly low score, something that will incur no expenses they will have made large amounts of money. Honest reviewing is dead.

Avatar image for ms555
ms555

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 ms555
Member since 2007 • 2665 Posts

It's called attention for monetary reasons. Halo Reach is a 9.5+ game and there is no question about it. But, if a site gives it 8.0 you will click the link to the review because it stands out from the ordinary. Many other users will do this too since they are intrigued by the irregularity. Now, each user that visits the site will load advertisements and generate revenue for the owners of the site. So by performing the action of giving Halo Reach an absurdly low score, something that will incur no expenses they will have made large amounts of money. Honest reviewing is dead.

ImprovedMind
THOSE LYING BA$TARD$ AT JOHNSON AND JOHNSON!
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#10 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
All the score I've seen have largely been nines and a few 8s. It's really not inconsistant. I've seen much more inconsistent review scores. Look at Banjo Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts, Final Fantasy XIII and Halo Wars. Sounds more like you're just angry since a small few reviewers aren't giving it 9+ scores.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
The funniest I have seen is from IGN. They praise the game the whole way through and then mention that 13 maps is a bit less for launch (even though Halo 3 launched with like 10 maps and he admitted more will probably be added via DLC) and then IGN us gave it a 9.5 while IGN UK's base scores were the EXACT SAME but they gave it a 10 :?
Avatar image for AJBUB
AJBUB

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AJBUB
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
IGN has probably the best review
Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts

The funniest I have seen is from IGN. They praise the game the whole way through and then mention that 13 maps is a bit less for launch (even though Halo 3 launched with like 10 maps and he admitted more will probably be added via DLC) and then IGN us gave it a 9.5 while IGN UK's base scores were the EXACT SAME but they gave it a 10 :?93soccer
now that ive seen Reviews i Can really care less what People think of it i know ill be playing this game for years and there is a interestinginterview from what i got out of it there trying to Find away to put FOrge world maps in matchmaking like the Ones we make so expect some interesting post launch DLC and upadates . heres the Link if you wanna watch it :http://www.ign.com/videos/2010/09/12/halo-reach-video-interview-the-future

Avatar image for Hakud0ushi
Hakud0ushi

7613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 Hakud0ushi
Member since 2005 • 7613 Posts
Reach for me is an 8.5, im not trying to flame or whatever, im just not a faboy. The game feels ok from what i played, definitly overrated.
Avatar image for gta4_2112
gta4_2112

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 gta4_2112
Member since 2007 • 3270 Posts

They're all 8 and above.

Avatar image for x-2tha-z
x-2tha-z

8994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#16 x-2tha-z
Member since 2003 • 8994 Posts
The reviews all look good to me. 93 on metacritic is also really good.
Avatar image for Xbox360Gamer15
Xbox360Gamer15

3937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 Xbox360Gamer15
Member since 2009 • 3937 Posts
Reach for me is an 8.5, im not trying to flame or whatever, im just not a faboy. The game feels ok from what i played, definitly overrated.Hakud0ushi
thats a lie....no halo game is overrated...stop flaming please.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I don't really read any reviews other than GS. Though I disagree with even them sometimes, too.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="ImprovedMind"]

It's called attention for monetary reasons. Halo Reach is a 9.5+ game and there is no question about it. But, if a site gives it 8.0 you will click the link to the review because it stands out from the ordinary. Many other users will do this too since they are intrigued by the irregularity. Now, each user that visits the site will load advertisements and generate revenue for the owners of the site. So by performing the action of giving Halo Reach an absurdly low score, something that will incur no expenses they will have made large amounts of money. Honest reviewing is dead.

ms555
THOSE LYING BA$TARD$ AT JOHNSON AND JOHNSON!

Yes. Blame J&J for their Lavender Baby Wash... LOL jk :P
Avatar image for Zeus89x
Zeus89x

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Zeus89x
Member since 2010 • 127 Posts

The answer is simple.

Microsoft never sent out that check to the reviewers.

/thread

Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#23 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Phoenix534
It's not always an opinion. For some of the differences people would have to be lying. You can't say that the campaign is five hours while another person says it's 12.
Avatar image for Zophar87
Zophar87

4344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Zophar87
Member since 2008 • 4344 Posts

After the Metroid: Other M reviews, I can honestly say I don't care for critic-reviews.

Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts

reviews are made by people,different people have different opinions

Avatar image for shaunchgo
shaunchgo

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 shaunchgo
Member since 2006 • 4605 Posts

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Phoenix534
Agreed.
Avatar image for dissembled
dissembled

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 dissembled
Member since 2003 • 357 Posts

Different strokes for different folks. And the variability on the campaign length can simply be explained by the various difficulty options.

Avatar image for JordanizPro
JordanizPro

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 JordanizPro
Member since 2009 • 1912 Posts

IGN is trash

Avatar image for max-Emadness
max-Emadness

1781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 max-Emadness
Member since 2009 • 1781 Posts

IGM Uk gave it a 10, ign us gave it a 9.5, machinima.com gave it a 9.5, joystick gave it a 5/5, gamesreactor gave it a 10 i think, metecrtic gave it a 93. Were was it given an 8 other than gamesradar

Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

shaunchgo

Agreed.

not true you could bash in the head with a crowbar



Uploaded with

Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts

im not reading reviews till i play it and beat it my self why would u care what others say are u some trendy hipsters kid who cares what other people think of them???

(not saying u r just an example)

i personally feel the only review that matters is my own

Avatar image for FPS1337
FPS1337

2519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#32 FPS1337
Member since 2009 • 2519 Posts
F**K SCORES! THIS GAME DESERVES A 10! Modern Warfare 2 got good reviews and there's no way uncharted 2 is as good as this, so never listen to scores. I just watch reviews so I know a little more about the controls and modes and story, but never look at the score.
Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts
F**K SCORES! THIS GAME DESERVES A 10! Modern Warfare 2 got good reviews and there's no way uncharted 2 is as good as this, so never listen to scores. I just watch reviews so I know a little more about the controls and modes and story, but never look at the score.FPS1337
agreed mario galaxy a 10 halo a 9 how this possible
Avatar image for dissembled
dissembled

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 dissembled
Member since 2003 • 357 Posts

Because it's most likely that the games were reviewed by two different people.

Avatar image for Vader993
Vader993

7533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Vader993
Member since 2010 • 7533 Posts

[QUOTE="FPS1337"]F**K SCORES! THIS GAME DESERVES A 10! Modern Warfare 2 got good reviews and there's no way uncharted 2 is as good as this, so never listen to scores. I just watch reviews so I know a little more about the controls and modes and story, but never look at the score.Killmckillerkil
agreed mario galaxy a 10 halo a 9 how this possible

a little thing called bribes

Avatar image for jarvis008
jarvis008

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 jarvis008
Member since 2008 • 518 Posts

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Legolas_Katarn

It's not always an opinion. For some of the differences people would have to be lying. You can't say that the campaign is five hours while another person says it's 12.

I pre-ordered the game from Zavvi.com and got it yesterday.:D I completed the campaign on Heroic difficulty in about 12 hours. You could obviously complete it faster than that especially if you were playing on easy but 5 hours still seems ridiculously fast to me.

By the way I'd personally give the campaign an 8.5, it was very good but I wasn't blown away by it. I haven't played any multiplayer yet though.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#37 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="shaunchgo"][QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

It's called an opinion. People have them, and you can't do a damn thing about it.

Vader993

Agreed.

not true you could bash in the head with a crowbar



Uploaded with

LOL! nice

Avatar image for damaster101
damaster101

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 damaster101
Member since 2005 • 1476 Posts

[QUOTE="FPS1337"]F**K SCORES! THIS GAME DESERVES A 10! Modern Warfare 2 got good reviews and there's no way uncharted 2 is as good as this, so never listen to scores. I just watch reviews so I know a little more about the controls and modes and story, but never look at the score.Killmckillerkil
agreed mario galaxy a 10 halo a 9 how this possible

Mario Galaxy is something that is incredibly unique i haven't really seen any other game like that done before.Halo on the other hand is an FPS which i've seen a million times before, its got to have done something really amazing to change the way an shooter plays.Or bribes who knows?

I hope i didn't completely destroy your ego.

Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts

[QUOTE="Killmckillerkil"][QUOTE="FPS1337"]F**K SCORES! THIS GAME DESERVES A 10! Modern Warfare 2 got good reviews and there's no way uncharted 2 is as good as this, so never listen to scores. I just watch reviews so I know a little more about the controls and modes and story, but never look at the score.damaster101

agreed mario galaxy a 10 halo a 9 how this possible

Mario Galaxy is something that is incredibly unique i haven't really seen any other game like that done before.Halo on the other hand is an FPS which i've seen a million times before, its got to have done something really amazing to change the way an shooter plays.Or bribes who knows?

I hope i didn't completely destroy your ego.

do u know haw many different verison of mario games r out there??? not very unique maybe it was unique in the late 80s
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#40 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Standards change and it competes with other FPSs!

Avatar image for TheMightyHoov
TheMightyHoov

2459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 TheMightyHoov
Member since 2009 • 2459 Posts

I dont see much of a problem with the reviews.....

Avatar image for Coldzboy
Coldzboy

1960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 Coldzboy
Member since 2004 • 1960 Posts

It's called they're paid by M$...

Avatar image for ComBaTsOuL
ComBaTsOuL

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ComBaTsOuL
Member since 2006 • 507 Posts

It's called they're paid by M$...

Coldzboy
Not the fact that the game might actually be great? I love how you get alot of people on here making comments about the game who haven't even played it yet....
Avatar image for Foulcry
Foulcry

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Foulcry
Member since 2008 • 960 Posts

I bet half the people that actually complain about how bad Halo is actually play it to death and actually love it to death but just like to bash it. I myself can't wait for this game although I hated Halo 3. I loved Halo CE and Halo 2 though and this game looks like a mix of all three put together. A lot of people I used to play with will probably start playing again. A lot of people who were diehard Halo fans quit because of Halo 3 and hopefully this bring back my love for playing it back along with the people I used to play with. I truely miss it.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I find it kind of funny how people think there is some gigantic conspiracy behind Halo Reach ratings.

Halo CE, Halo 2 and Halo 3 all were outstanding games with ODST being the black-sheep of the family and it was a stand-alone game.

Halo Reach is an AAA title, possibly(hopefully) even a 10. Microsoft doesn't need to pay ANYBODY to give Halo a good rating, the game and it's predecessors have proven that already.

Halo Reach is going to get 9.5 at a minimum. No sense arguing or complaining about it, Halo fanboys and haters alike.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#47 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Reach for me is an 8.5, im not trying to flame or whatever, im just not a faboy. The game feels ok from what i played, definitly overrated.Hakud0ushi

I don't know man. I mean it seems to have "Improved" what has been done in the past.

Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts

Halo Reach is going to get 9.5 at a minimum. No sense arguing or complaining about it, Halo fanboys and haters alike.

airshocker

So far it is averaging 93 still with about 32 reviews. Halo 3 had 86 critics review it so it's not over yet we will just have to wait and see. Still though a great score either way though. You might be talking about Gamespot though and they gave Halo 3 a 9.5 so I wouldn't doubt it will get it again.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

So far it is averaging 93 still with about 32 reviews. Halo 3 had 86 critics review it so it's not over yet we will just have to wait and see. Still though a great score either way though. You might be talking about Gamespot though and they gave Halo 3 a 9.5 so I wouldn't doubt it will get it again.

craigalan23

I am posting on GameSpot, after all. :)

Avatar image for positivebalance
positivebalance

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 positivebalance
Member since 2010 • 2352 Posts

never seen inconsitent reviews? look at Mafia II. hell, look at Kane & Lynch 2. Reach has a 93% average...