The reviews have come in so far, and they are strange to say the least. I am not going to attack their personal opionions, but I will point out how strangve it is that they say Halo Reach is the best Halo game ever, then give it the lowest review scores of all four games. I find it strange how they call the campaing deep and say how the online puts other games to shame, then give it lower reviews than modern warfare 2!! I love how they are nitpicking the tiniest details that may possibly be not so perfect and call it justice to give it a 90?! Too many features is a problem? Hopw about how one reviewer says it is a plethora of goodies while another complains it lacks enough maps and how forge is pointless and firefight is just transferred from ODST. How one reviewer says the campaign is 12 hours while another complains how much he hated the five hour campaign.
I have never seen reviews be so inconsistent ever! None of them can agree on something, seriously! It seems that they were reallyh afraid to be accused of giving biased reviews, so they made it as brutal as possible. While if a 93 on metacritic is as brutal as they could get, that is still saying something. This game is still top notch!
Log in to comment