Halo Wars review today?!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for raidenseven
raidenseven

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 raidenseven
Member since 2005 • 3223 Posts

Well the Halo Wars review embargo was lifted, with IGN and a few others already releasing reviews which are pretty solid. i saw a 9 and 8.5's

i am getting this game but i am looking forward to reading Gamespots review, who else is looking forward to this game! its gonna be fun! i think the game will at least get a solid 8.5 here, but i really think it could get a 9.0. its a really good game IMO, the demo convinced me and i already have the LE pre-ordered.

what i really thought was awesome was how much there hasnt been flaming for this game. like at N4G.com, usually anything Halo gets ripped into or even here at SW! i think its pretty cool not having a halo game being ripped into just because its halo and i think its really wierd going into N4G.com's reviews for HW and seeing people (whether the game gets an 8-9) actually respect and applaud the game a def change in the tone taken to a halo game, maybe because its made by Ensemble instead of Bungie. idk. i already know the PC 1337 view andi still think this game is really fun compared to other RTS's maybe not complex but its still great in my book! cant wait,

what do you guys think?

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#2 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
GS usually waits until a game is released so they can actually play the multiplayer modes with the public, not on partially loaded servers of reviewers/developers only.
Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts
6.5, ouch....
Avatar image for spinmastah
spinmastah

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 spinmastah
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

6.5, ouch....Legendaryscmt

6.5 was generous for this game. The horrible AI, and gutted control scheme should have sent this game to the 5.0 range. RTS games have evolved beyond only being allowed to build on certain pads. They attempted to cover up their lame excuse for AI with having endlessly spawning enemies.

The only reason anyone would consider buying this game is because they are Halo fanatics, rent it, enjoy the story, then toss this excuse for an RTS.

Avatar image for raidenseven
raidenseven

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 raidenseven
Member since 2005 • 3223 Posts

eh i cant really agree with that score, but oh well its their opinion. i cant wait for this game to come out. looks like it is going to be really fun stuff.

imo 6.5 is really harsh. :S espcially since other reviews ive seen have mostly been 8-9 im surprised it would get at least an 8 here...

Avatar image for wartutheshid
wartutheshid

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 wartutheshid
Member since 2009 • 26 Posts

im an RTS fan and this game looks amazing.

6.5 is BS, i will never watch anymore of your reviews Gamespot. Even IGN gave it an 8.5/

Avatar image for raidenseven
raidenseven

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 raidenseven
Member since 2005 • 3223 Posts
[QUOTE="wartutheshid"]

im an RTS fan and this game looks amazing.

6.5 is BS, i will never watch anymore of your reviews Gamespot. Even IGN gave it an 8.5/

i just watched the review WTF, that sounded like such a random review idk oh and wtf is with covenant and flood not being playable in the SP campaign a negative?!!?!!? or the flood not being in MP negative??? ok so if you play a game with bad guys unless they let you play as them then it stinks???? halo CE has the best storyline in the haloverse because you didnt get to play as the arbiter, and i think this game will have an on-par story due to that same fact. i just find that out of the reasons to give it negatives its due to the way they told their story??? wich he admits is EPIC a couple times in the game... idk about gamespot... :P
Avatar image for NsaneNoob
NsaneNoob

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NsaneNoob
Member since 2005 • 68 Posts
Gamespot reviewers are kind of dying. Look at all the good stuff they said about the game, and yet they don't enjoy it as much. They hired some horrible reviewers this year and half of last.
Avatar image for mithrixx
mithrixx

1071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 mithrixx
Member since 2008 • 1071 Posts
6.5 is very low man. Can't believe that gamespot considers Halo Wars on the same level of Lost Odyssey or red alert. I feel that is unfair and I am not even a Halo fan.
Avatar image for MFDABADKID
MFDABADKID

1144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MFDABADKID
Member since 2007 • 1144 Posts
one 360 1st party exclusive down & one to go......lol
Avatar image for deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
deactivated-5c37d3adcd094

8362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
Member since 2006 • 8362 Posts
6.5 is probably a just score, maybe a little low. A fair RTS it may be, but there are some huge names on the PC which play much better.
Avatar image for Erik729
Erik729

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Erik729
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts
[QUOTE="wartutheshid"]

im an RTS fan and this game looks amazing.

6.5 is BS, i will never watch anymore of your reviews Gamespot. Even IGN gave it an 8.5/

raidenseven

i just watched the review WTF, that sounded like such a random review idk oh and wtf is with covenant and flood not being playable in the SP campaign a negative?!!?!!? or the flood not being in MP negative??? ok so if you play a game with bad guys unless they let you play as them then it stinks???? halo CE has the best storyline in the haloverse because you didnt get to play as the arbiter, and i think this game will have an on-par story due to that same fact. i just find that out of the reasons to give it negatives its due to the way they told their story??? wich he admits is EPIC a couple times in the game... idk about gamespot... :P

It is probably a negative because in games like Starcraft: you CAN.

Avatar image for Th3-UnS33n
Th3-UnS33n

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Th3-UnS33n
Member since 2008 • 391 Posts
Eh, comparing it to PC RTS games is harsh. This game is fun, content-packed, and introduces many people to the RTS genre. Not meant to compete with PC RTS games.
Avatar image for SPARTAN_D7
SPARTAN_D7

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SPARTAN_D7
Member since 2007 • 477 Posts

[QUOTE="Legendaryscmt"]6.5, ouch....spinmastah

6.5 was generous for this game. The horrible AI, and gutted control scheme should have sent this game to the 5.0 range. RTS games have evolved beyond only being allowed to build on certain pads. They attempted to cover up their lame excuse for AI with having endlessly spawning enemies.

The only reason anyone would consider buying this game is because they are Halo fanatics, rent it, enjoy the story, then toss this excuse for an RTS.

Wow you have alot of insight on this considering all we have been able to do is play a 15 minute demo....
Avatar image for grunt1096
grunt1096

120769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 grunt1096
Member since 2007 • 120769 Posts

No Flood or Covenant control, what do you expect.mjk_1

Yeah I'm really disappointed you can't control the Covenant.

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
6.5 is not what I expected. Still getting the game though.
Avatar image for ace070590
ace070590

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 ace070590
Member since 2007 • 439 Posts
Despite what people say about Halo Wars it deserved a lot more than a 6.5! I know it's not the gretaest RTS in existence, but I didn't expect it to be; nevertheless, Halo Wars should have been given a 8.0-8.5. The game wasn't perfect, but the game was FUN.
Avatar image for ace070590
ace070590

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 ace070590
Member since 2007 • 439 Posts
No Flood or Covenant control, what do you expect.mjk_1
I'll give you that, but the game still is fun and should have had a 8.0 at least.
Avatar image for RoslindaleOne
RoslindaleOne

7566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 RoslindaleOne
Member since 2006 • 7566 Posts
6.5 is not what I expected. Still getting the game though.Floppy_Jim
Yeah, same here.
Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts

Ive just watched the review and I think the reviewer in this case has completely lost sight of what the point of halo wars is

Some of the things I agree with, from the demo i can tell the AI has a tendency to be a bit daft, theres no option to control the flood and the graphics arent exacty the best that the console is capable of but what i dont agree with is his negative slating of the gameplay. I wont go into excessive details, you can obviously watch it yourself, but hes just basically comparing it to a pc RTS complaining about such things as its simplicity, smal maps etc and that is just an absolutly ridiculous thing to do!

Anyone whos even looked at the demo, let alone tracked the games development, will know that this game was never meant to be a complex/indepth game in the same vein as a pc RTS for the simple reason that previous console RTS games have tried to be as indepth as pc RTS's and subsaquantly run face first into the limits of game consoles and completely screwed up. Halo wars on the other hand by realisticly sticking to the limits of game consoles i think has, though making itself perhaps a lil too simple for some, basically avoided destroying itself by being just what it is, a console game not a pc one!

Basically I say the gamespot review should be compeltely discounted because the narrow minded dult has basically lost sight of what the point of halo wars simplicity is, if the game was meant t be as indepth as a pc based PG I'm sure it would be on a pc!