This topic is locked from further discussion.
The new halo 2 maps arn't worth it in my opinion, but the Rainbow Six, Red Edition Map pack is really worth it.
i dont play halo2 anymore, compared to the normal 360 titles, it just doesnt do if for me like it used to, it seems ive become immersed in more varied objectives... realism, or something new, rather than the plain run and gun that halo inspires. i do however still like and play the original halo, the classics never dieexplodinglamas
Â
halo isnt a classic..
Â
Goldeneye is a classic
Doom is a classic
Wolfenstein is a classic
Quake is a classicÂ
Â
Â
halo is not a "classic"Â
[QUOTE="explodinglamas"]i dont play halo2 anymore, compared to the normal 360 titles, it just doesnt do if for me like it used to, it seems ive become immersed in more varied objectives... realism, or something new, rather than the plain run and gun that halo inspires. i do however still like and play the original halo, the classics never dieWraithsLotus
Â
halo isnt a classic..
Â
Goldeneye is a classic
Doom is a classic
Wolfenstein is a classic
Quake is a classic
Â
Â
halo is not a "classic"
The only thing that those games have that Halo doesn't is AARP memberships. Each of them brought an innovation, and so did Halo. It was the first good dual-analog shooter, brought vehicles as part of a level onto the scene better than any games before it that tried, and had great multiplayer (far better than Goldeneye IMO)
Not only that, but I think it was the first to use melee, if not the first, the first to pull it off. Not to mention Halo is just so much fun to play.lokiisback
Melee-ing with your weapon was nothing new when Halo came out, but it was never useful and almost always considered shameful to "die by melee".Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment