This topic is locked from further discussion.
Holy crap that's hilarious. It seriously does deserve it too. What's classic is that Gamespot still has that Hour of Victory ad up with the Gamespot quote: "a promising WW2 shooter".Zeliard9
darn you beat me too the irony, it is funny though
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Holy crap that's hilarious. It seriously does deserve it too. What's classic is that Gamespot still has that Hour of Victory ad up with the Gamespot quote: "a promising WW2 shooter".vendettared468
darn you beat me too the irony, it is funny though
Gamespot needs to get paid. ;)
What are you guys talking about, all I see is pure adrenaline pumping GOTY shooting action right here. Buying a copy as we speak.limpbizkit818lol :lol:
I actually felt it in my gut when I read the 2.0. I was expecting a bad score from Jeff's post leading up to the review, but, man...September_Grey
i know, it was pretty mean
[QUOTE="September_Grey"]I actually felt it in my gut when I read the 2.0. I was expecting a bad score from Jeff's post leading up to the review, but, man...Mikerules868
i know, it was pretty mean
It was blunt and honest. Jeff writes great reviews.
am i the only one that think that the new review system absolutely sucks!! no detailed score for graphics, sound, gameplay etc..Muhannad_basicYa I really hate it. The old way was more accurate, and I see right off the bat how a game was in graphics/sound/value/gameplay. I love the medals, but bring back the old scoring system.
So am I correct in saying that this is the lowest scoring 360 game ever? I know Bomberman got a 2.9, was there anything lower?
EDIT: Ok, I just checked. We can now say with complete confidence, that Hour of Victory is the worst Xbox 360 to date.
Developers and the poeple involved need to stop being blind to the fact that just because they create the game it will be good. Really... how in the hell can they miss some of these bugs and glitches. One game that comes to mind is StarWars Battlefront or CoD2 (before patch). Did they really not notice the lag? Did they decide to not test it? One test is all they needed to notice how bad it was. There are the extreme budget titles that are $20 that have less bugs then some $60 titles.........
All i can is Developers and anyone involved stop being blind and reconize when things are wrong with your game and not turn your cheeck because YOU created it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment