Really thats all WOW I thought it was Much much longer. 6 - 7 hours is nothing. i mean R6V was longer then that. does anyones else agree with this 6 - 7 hours. its not that i don t believe youitsjust that I want a second source.
well, i was a late buyer. I got Halo 2 this january, just after I finished Gears of War... I can tell you it took me more than gears on hardcore to finish halo on normal. Not becuase it was hard, but because it was longer.
Gears the first time took me 8-10hours, and Halo took me maybe 10-12.
If you want a good single player FPS, I don't recommend Halo 2. I beat it in under 10 hours, and it's not that great.Trickshot771
ya but i dont play halo2 online any more and im a little tired of the gamesI have now and have no cash for new ones so i was thiking about trying the single player in halo.
It feels like the developers took a dump on your face compared to Halo 1. I loved every minute of the first one, and if it wasn't for the online play of the second one it would have been a 6/10 at the most. 10/10 for MP though.
You can run through it on easy, like you can any game. Playing on Heroic and the game should last you 10+ hours. The game is really fun on co-op, so if you can find someone to play it with.
I had a great time with it, but I don't feel like going through it a second time. It was fun, it was interesting, but it wasn't as good as it should have been.
why do you care about the single player lenght of a 3 year old mostly mutiplayer game?azorath44
because i have the game lying there i was late getting into halo 3 and never tried the single player so before getting another game i thought i could try the single player.
Halo 2 isn't worth it purely for the single player campaign, but if you have XBL, then you should buy it. Alot of people still play online and it's still pretty fun to me.
Log in to comment