I am pissed about xbox live, I have to pay and not 4 PS3's service and....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xXSCREWSTONEXx
xXSCREWSTONEXx

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xXSCREWSTONEXx
Member since 2006 • 517 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

Avatar image for Gregoroth
Gregoroth

2552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Gregoroth
Member since 2005 • 2552 Posts
I have no idea. I would have thought Xbox Live dwarfs the amount of users on the Playstation version? That could mean the chances of getting a poor host are increased? I'm not really sure how it all works but as long as I'm winning matches, I'm happy.
Avatar image for OWUaaronTSi
OWUaaronTSi

252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 OWUaaronTSi
Member since 2003 • 252 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx
Another useless post from another useless troll. i play Gears of War and Rainbow 6 all the time WITHOUT lag. you have no back up to what you are saying. Didn't even mentioned what games u played on xbox. In fact you contradict urself in ur post. "Sony does a better job when it comes to online play" then later "but it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc..." Aren't those all part of online play? Yes they are. And xbox does it right.
Avatar image for JtodaD
JtodaD

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 JtodaD
Member since 2007 • 132 Posts
Fanboy ALERT!
Avatar image for clubside
clubside

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 clubside
Member since 2004 • 667 Posts

You're enjoying a singular feature of PSN, dedicated servers. Xbox Live is mostly a P2P service when it comes to actual gaming. You can find lag-free servers everywhere, but you have to look. It is up to the host's connection speed and the ping quality of the guests. What you're not paying for on PSN is in the future when they decide to close down the Resistance servers and yo no longer can play it while people can still play the original Unreal Championship on their original Xbox. While this won't happen for quite a while, it is the ultimate problem with both the PS2 and PS3 networks: hosts are only around for as long as publisher's are willing to pay for them.

With dedicated servers they can crank all the bandwidth they want and each user is hitting this super connection. There can still be lag (as I and other Resistance players have found on occasion) because of the very nature of the Internet. With P2P server you suffer from people not knowing their own connections. You'll find people with 256K upload speeds trying to run 16 player servers when they really can at best host four. Besides game information with Live you are transferring headset chatter.

What you pay for with Live cannot be found on PSN: common friends list (yes, Resistance doesn't use your XMB friends list), game invites and joins, private chat and a lot more. What happens when you hit the PS button? The choice to turn off the controller or the system. The Xbox Guide button? Access to all your friends, what games they're playing, sending messages, browsing game lists and achievements and more. Live is an actual service, PSN is a patchwork at one place controlled by Sony (the XMB) while everywhere else it's in the developer's hands.

I like low-lag 40 person battles as well, but in no case would I trade Xbox Live's feature set for a single game's implementation when most of the other games don't even support voice and I can't even invite friends or see if they're online without returning to the "operating system".

Avatar image for ghostjga
ghostjga

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ghostjga
Member since 2005 • 465 Posts
PSN is regional... means i'm in Japan, I can't play with my US buddies back home... and that awesomely sucks the behind....
Avatar image for Donac
Donac

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Donac
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

I have both consoles and have played on XBL and PSN. Resistance runs great online, hosting 40 people whilst not compensating for this graphically. I was impressed by this BUT I was not impressed by the Network features such as messaging friends, download rates which are simply horrendous, lack of content and generally how inept the web browser was. By contrast XBL is something worth paying for. Downloads from XBL are pretty fast, the content excellent, its user friendly and provides a perfect medium for communicating with other persons on LIVE.

PSN showed me how much I appreciate XBL - I'd gladly pay.

Avatar image for njdss4
njdss4

2721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#8 njdss4
Member since 2003 • 2721 Posts
Fanboy ALERT! JtodaD
Yup! TROLL! Somebody lock this POS this is System Wars material.
Avatar image for kieran88
kieran88

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kieran88
Member since 2004 • 2273 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx
Lol the ps3 online service is not as good. Maybe you're just unlucky with live. Trust me, you get what you pay for and it's not even expensive.
Avatar image for Robbie8912
Robbie8912

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#10 Robbie8912
Member since 2006 • 2299 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx
Dude......Shut up! Go take your $600 barbeque over to the PS3 forum. We can buy extra maps and things for our games, can you?
Avatar image for Prid3r
Prid3r

8643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 Prid3r
Member since 2004 • 8643 Posts

*Point at MGO .*

 

/Thread 

Avatar image for the_General_G
the_General_G

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 the_General_G
Member since 2006 • 121 Posts
The reason that we have to pay about live is that if we donät pay gamemakers can put their own monthly payment to the mmorpg like ps3 in live there is always the same payment and it's quite cheap think if we had to pay every single game to play online.
Avatar image for WarTime71
WarTime71

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 WarTime71
Member since 2007 • 404 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx
shut up fanboy stop trolling
Avatar image for gp19
gp19

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 gp19
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts
Ohhh MY GOD!! I didn't know, the PS3 service is free, oh crap... I'm gonna sell my 360 right away... Cool, Im gonna buy ressistance, and after i'm done i'm gonna play ressistance, and after that I think I'm gonna get ressistance, and then ressistance, and after that I'm gonna stick with the games I have and try o get all the achievements... whoppss don't have any... well ressistance and all my other games are really fun online, so i'm gonna play until somehting good comes out, hopefully.
Avatar image for __MasterVAL__
__MasterVAL__

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 __MasterVAL__
Member since 2006 • 519 Posts

[QUOTE="JtodaD"]Fanboy ALERT! njdss4

Yup! TROLL! Somebody lock this POS this is System Wars material.

FANBOY ALERT - BOOT HIM!!!  LOL :twisted:

Next-Generation Gaming is playing games with your friends on Xbox Live.  PERIOD. :!

Avatar image for ghettocheeze
ghettocheeze

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ghettocheeze
Member since 2004 • 254 Posts

Let me clear a few things, first I'm a PS360 owner and I think Sony does a much better job with the lag free stuff. You have to see it for yourself to be impressed 40 guys in one room and no hicups that is awesome in my book. Second, the guy who said the Sony server's will go down in a few years is WRONG cause I still play Socom even after five years now and that game was the first online game Sony ever released. However, Live is better in certain areas like chat and friends and also easy to use. Personally I'd recomend live to only the hardcore gamers and those people who wanna go online for the first time should stick with Sony cause it'll save you a lot of money if you just want to casually play for time to time. Also the addition of home could really make things interesting.

Verdict: For now stick with Live cause its excellent overall but in the future Sony could make online gaming for the masses cause in the end we are all cheap bastards. 

Avatar image for justforlotr2004
justforlotr2004

10935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 justforlotr2004
Member since 2004 • 10935 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx

Good luck playing MGS 3 online or Socom, try not to get too mad when you find out that they have closed down the server for those games, yet even 4-5 year old xbox games still play fine on live.  Also if 40 people in Resistance on PS3 suprises you, Im sure 42 with Delta Squad Black hawk down on the original Xbox will blow your mind.

Avatar image for shadow8585
shadow8585

2947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 shadow8585
Member since 2006 • 2947 Posts
XBL has WAAYY less lag than PSN, my friend with a better connection than me lagged on Call of Duty 3 PS3 more than I do Call of Duty X360 and I was in a match with about 20 people.
Avatar image for __MasterVAL__
__MasterVAL__

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 __MasterVAL__
Member since 2006 • 519 Posts

Let me clear a few things, first I'm a PS360 owner and I think Sony does a much better job with the lag free stuff. You have to see it for yourself to be impressed 40 guys in one room and no hicups that is awesome in my book. Second, the guy who said the Sony server's will go down in a few years is WRONG cause I still play Socom even after five years now and that game was the first online game Sony ever released. However, Live is better in certain areas like chat and friends and also easy to use. Personally I'd recomend live to only the hardcore gamers and those people who wanna go online for the first time should stick with Sony cause it'll save you a lot of money if you just want to casually play for time to time. Also the addition of home could really make things interesting.

Verdict: For now stick with Live cause its excellent overall but in the future Sony could make online gaming for the masses cause in the end we are all cheap bastards. 

ghettocheeze

 

...blah, blah, blah... :twisted:

Next-Generation Gaming is playing games with your friends on Xbox Live.  PERIOD.

Avatar image for pjam07
pjam07

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 pjam07
Member since 2004 • 170 Posts
hahaha trolll
Avatar image for Goldeneyemaster
Goldeneyemaster

6906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Goldeneyemaster
Member since 2003 • 6906 Posts

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

xXSCREWSTONEXx
Is this a joke?
Avatar image for lobobizarro
lobobizarro

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 lobobizarro
Member since 2005 • 681 Posts
[QUOTE="xXSCREWSTONEXx"]

The PS3's online service is amazingly good!!! I noticed that it lags less than xbox live, so why the hell do I have to pay for xbox live when Sony does a better job when it comes to online play? Oh and I am very surprised how Resistance handles so well even with like 40 people on one server. Is it the way the game's are designed? Or is it the system? I am just very happy that PS3's service kicks so much ass!!! But it could use upgrades when it comes to messaging, friends and etc...

Goldeneyemaster
Is this a joke?

The joke is that apparently this is an OK thread by Mods... since it still has not been locked up.
Avatar image for Julesmaester
Julesmaester

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Julesmaester
Member since 2005 • 285 Posts
Congractulations: for making such a stupid thread you've been reported to the amdins.