I Hate Gears Of War

ihate gears of war,but also like it as well,it's just a couple of things piss me off about gears.here is my kist ofn things i hate about gears in no particular order.

the friggin host advantage(seriously they need to fix this)

the lag(i payfor xbox live, i deserve more dammit)

quitters(i really hate when people quit, especially when the host quits. i also hate when people quit even though it's only one round left)

douchebags( i hate people who still your kills:in ranked matches:, won't revive you especially if you're right next to me and no enemies arearound me or you, people who like to talk alot of mess, and glitchers)

All of the stuff you hate is mp not sp.....?

I've been in love with Gears of War multiplayer since I got the game. I think it blows Halo multiplayer away by a long shot.

There won't be a game as revolutionary as Gears for a long time.

I've been in love with Gears of War multiplayer since I got the game. I think it blows Halo multiplayer away by a long shot.

There won't be a game as revolutionary as Gears for a long time.

sc_kid42

I'll just wait for someone as stupid as I am to take this one and not the comment about Halo kid

I've been in love with Gears of War multiplayer since I got the game. I think it blows Halo multiplayer away by a long shot.

There won't be a game as revolutionary as Gears for a long time.

sc_kid42

LOL, please elaborate, how did Gears revolutionize anything? It was a great game, and I had fun with the MP for a bit, but I like skill in my online games, and Gears lacks a lot in that dept.

Join the club. Gears of War multiplayer sucks. I can't believe I played it as long as I did.Trickshot771

WOW!!! First Of All: Every onlien game has all of those problems so shut up.

2nd Of All : Gears Of War won 12 gaming awards 9 of them being online !!

3rd Of All : Never Make stipid threads about games who hate because FYI : None Cares!

yea no one cares if u hate it this is a pointless threadGEARSofWAR360

No one cares what you think pointless post

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

Gears, being in third person mode, brings a lot more innovation and ability to the table. You can roll, evade, and hide behind cover in a much more realistic sense than any other games. The cover system revolutionized many things, because while it had been in other games before where it takes one or two shots to kill you, Gears of war has implemented it like no other.

The down system is also revolutionary, giving players a second chance if they have been hurt too much or out of cover for too long. Allowing players to revive you while downed, but still allowing enemies to finish you off if no teamwork is used has allowed for a sense of forgiveness.

Another thing is teamwork. In Halo, no one cares about teamwork except in maybe capture the flag. You just go around and kill everyone. In Gears, you usually need teamwork to win, considering there are only 4 of you and you don't respawn. Note the revive thing above.

And by the way, I'd appreciate not being referred to as a kid. I think I deserve more respect than that, thank you.

ihate gears of war,but also like it as well,it's just a couple of things piss me off about gears.here is my kist ofn things i hate about gears in no particular order.

the friggin host advantage(seriously they need to fix this)

the lag(i payfor xbox live, i deserve more dammit)

quitters(i really hate when people quit, especially when the host quits. i also hate when people quit even though it's only one round left)

douchebags( i hate people who still your kills:in ranked matches:, won't revive you especially if you're right next to me and no enemies arearound me or you, people who like to talk alot of mess, and glitchers)

king_supreme

I also wanted to know why there are also people who say no one cares when they are giving more attention than others and obviously seem more upset than the ones who "care"

I don't know Go figure

WOW!!! First Of All: Every onlien game has all of those problems so shut up.

2nd Of All : Gears Of War won 12 gaming awards 9 of them being online !!

3rd Of All : Never Make stipid threads about games who hate because FYI : None Cares!

soufan123

The only bad thing about any multiplayer online game are the people. They all sound like a bunch of fanboys....Have you ever seen that ep of Red vs Blue with all the fanboys fighting eachother?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY8Qx1ze6wk

check that out...that pretty much sums up online gaming

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

Gears, being in third person mode, brings a lot more innovation and ability to the table. You can roll, evade, and hide behind cover in a much more realistic sense than any other games. The cover system revolutionized many things, because while it had been in other games before where it takes one or two shots to kill you, Gears of war has implemented it like no other.

The down system is also revolutionary, giving players a second chance if they have been hurt too much or out of cover for too long. Allowing players to revive you while downed, but still allowing enemies to finish you off if no teamwork is used has allowed for a sense of forgiveness.

Another thing is teamwork. In Halo, no one cares about teamwork except in maybe capture the flag. You just go around and kill everyone. In Gears, you usually need teamwork to win, considering there are only 4 of you and you don't respawn. Note the revive thing above.

And by the way, I'd appreciate not being referred to as a kid. I think I deserve more respect than that, thank you.

sc_kid42

Halo didn't revolutionize shooters.

Gears was not the first game to use a cover system.

Reviving downed players has been a part of the Battlefield series for a long time now.

I lovee games with teamwork. gears did encourage that, and that was one of the reasons I enjoyed playing it.

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

there are two things i have learned from the last two days of playing.

1.I hate sniper active.

2.I hate when people quit.

Now let e explain why,I made a bet with my friend saying that i can get the Headshot Achievement in one day without getting the active reload achievements with it.So i made a new account and started playing for headshots,and i realized that the only people who are skilled with the sniper are the ones who dont useactive reloads to down people.And also since i had just started with a new profile i realized that you dont get the kils when more than 2 people leave the game so that is why i have a slight problem with Gears.

[QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

Gears, being in third person mode, brings a lot more innovation and ability to the table. You can roll, evade, and hide behind cover in a much more realistic sense than any other games. The cover system revolutionized many things, because while it had been in other games before where it takes one or two shots to kill you, Gears of war has implemented it like no other.

The down system is also revolutionary, giving players a second chance if they have been hurt too much or out of cover for too long. Allowing players to revive you while downed, but still allowing enemies to finish you off if no teamwork is used has allowed for a sense of forgiveness.

Another thing is teamwork. In Halo, no one cares about teamwork except in maybe capture the flag. You just go around and kill everyone. In Gears, you usually need teamwork to win, considering there are only 4 of you and you don't respawn. Note the revive thing above.

And by the way, I'd appreciate not being referred to as a kid. I think I deserve more respect than that, thank you.

TheCrazed420

Halo didn't revolutionize shooters.

Gears was not the first game to use a cover system.

Reviving downed players has been a part of the Battlefield series for a long time now.

I lovee games with teamwork. gears did encourage that, and that was one of the reasons I enjoyed playing it.

I know it wasn't the first to use cover. That's actually pretty much exactly what I said. It's also good that you're not saying Halo is better than Gears...because it's not. In pretty much any way.

But the reviving system is much different in Gears, and better as well. Don't forget, it's also been in Wolfenstein and other games. It's not a first, but just like many of its nonoriginal features, it does it better than all the games before it, and probably the games after it as well.

[QUOTE="GEARSofWAR360"]yea no one cares if u hate it this is a pointless threadDuddy316

No one cares what you think pointless post

[QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

same thing over and over again? r u high? in gears u get sick of running into stupid walls over and over again, gears is very poorly made, no vehicles, not many weapons, not many choices go and do differnt things during the game acept for running in the same direction and shooting the same 2 weapons over and over again,Fauij

And in Halo 2, I get sick of seeing the same atmosphere and reticule all the time on my screen. Gears has far more diversity when it comes to gameplay. In Halo, you shoot. Wow, big deal.

Also, a big problem with Halo is the fact that there are people that wake up, go to work, come home and play Halo for 8 hours, then rinse and repeat. They've done that for 2 1/2 years, and so they just pretty much kick the s**t out of anyone that they play. Gears, it's not like that. Yeah, there are people that are great at Gears, and believe it or not, I'm one of them. But there's not one person that hasn't had a game where you just suck drastically for whatever reason.

Unlike Halo, where if someone is amazing at the game, they will always own others. It gets very repetitive.

What the heck? Dude, quitters aren't something should be attempted to be controlled. Why? Would you rather some guy just standing there doing nothing? It's your right to quit a game. Be that it's not good sportsmanship, you still have a right. And then, who can control douchebags? There's no such thing asdouchebag detector, if you think someone's being a douchebag, then complain about him! It's that easy! As for host advantage... host your own match.

All of the nonsense you complain about here, is in every other game like Gears! Do you simply hate all video games? Really, if you want to hate something, then actually have reasons to!

[QUOTE="Fauij"][QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

same thing over and over again? r u high? in gears u get sick of running into stupid walls over and over again, gears is very poorly made, no vehicles, not many weapons, not many choices go and do differnt things during the game acept for running in the same direction and shooting the same 2 weapons over and over again,sc_kid42

And in Halo 2, I get sick of seeing the same atmosphere and reticule all the time on my screen. Gears has far more diversity when it comes to gameplay. In Halo, you shoot. Wow, big deal.

Also, a big problem with Halo is the fact that there are people that wake up, go to work, come home and play Halo for 8 hours, then rinse and repeat. They've done that for 2 1/2 years, and so they just pretty much kick the s**t out of anyone that they play. Gears, it's not like that. Yeah, there are people that are great at Gears, and believe it or not, I'm one of them. But there's not one person that hasn't had a game where you just suck drastically for whatever reason.

Unlike Halo, where if someone is amazing at the game, they will always own others. It gets very repetitive.

What are you talking about?!? If you aren't shooting, you're easily driving an arry of vehicles. Every mission is different, people saying Halo is repetitive don't own it. The mission variety is broad enough to havea good time, and plus no two weapons are exactly alike. I don't know about you, but I believe that Halo and Halo 2 are both immensly fun and have all the variety a shooter needs to be as amazing as Halo is.

Halo revolutionized first person shooters, right? Right. Well, at the end of the day, what makes Halo boring? Why do you put Halo down? Because you're doing the same thing over and over again. It's a first person shooter, and therefore has many limits.

Gears, being in third person mode, brings a lot more innovation and ability to the table. You can roll, evade, and hide behind cover in a much more realistic sense than any other games. The cover system revolutionized many things, because while it had been in other games before where it takes one or two shots to kill you, Gears of war has implemented it like no other.

The down system is also revolutionary, giving players a second chance if they have been hurt too much or out of cover for too long. Allowing players to revive you while downed, but still allowing enemies to finish you off if no teamwork is used has allowed for a sense of forgiveness.

Another thing is teamwork. In Halo, no one cares about teamwork except in maybe capture the flag. You just go around and kill everyone. In Gears, you usually need teamwork to win, considering there are only 4 of you and you don't respawn. Note the revive thing above.

And by the way, I'd appreciate not being referred to as a kid. I think I deserve more respect than that, thank you.

sc_kid42

Go ahead, and pop halo 2 in right now. go play team slayer and see how many games you win with out talking to your team. (if your playing with friends.) try going in to team slayer alone and get a match made team, you will lose to the 4 guys playing in a party together because they use team work. gears has the same amount of people who rush the sniper and try to get as many l337 headshotz as possible no matter what happens to their team tyoe players as halo. all online shooters are like that. the only thing that bothers me in gears is the shotgun and its "win the lottery" style of shooting. I can kill 3 guys by putting them in the same spot on my screen (shooting from the hip or quick aim) and kill them. the the next round I do the same thing and barely graze the guy. you figure 500 years in the future they could come up with a shotgun that is slightly accurate at more than 2 feet.

Pretty sure I own Halo and Halo 2. I like both of them, but Gears of War is a much better game.sc_kid42

Opinions are like a**holes... Everyone's got one and everyone thinks that everbody else's stinks.

Yeah, just like I've beaten a team of four when it was just me and another guy. It's a lot harder to do that in Gears of War than in Halo. Which is realistic.

Also, another thing that keeps Gears of War gamers coming back for more, whether they know it or not, is the unpredictability. How many times have you been seemingly shooting a guy in the back with a shotgun, then he just turns around, shoots you once, and you die?

In Halo, if a guy's shooting you in the back first, you're probably dead. There's not much chance for you to turn around and blow him away. Because Halo's too predictable. Gears is different everytime.

By the way, Gears isn't all that futuristic. It's just on a different planet.

You know the down system isnt revolutionary :P

ever play battlefield 2 or any other one, try the medic class, theres a limited time for you to be brought back to life so there its not revolutionary.

and the online problems with gears of war stand out alot more then other MP games like host advantage by ALOT, the lag is really ridiculous because you are forced to aim in front of your target which is what the game wasnt really designed for, especially sniping.

ALSO: wtf is this when i try to roll of a surface, guess what? I HAVE TO FACE THE SURFACE to get off of it. Like in Fuel Depot where the default sniper position is in the ocean containers, you cannot get out of there unless you face the direction your trying to get out of.

sry for the long post ppl :(

Yeah, just like I've beaten a team of four when it was just me and another guy. It's a lot harder to do that in Gears of War than in Halo. Which is realistic.

Also, another thing that keeps Gears of War gamers coming back for more, whether they know it or not, is the unpredictability. How many times have you been seemingly shooting a guy in the back with a shotgun, then he just turns around, shoots you once, and you die?

In Halo, if a guy's shooting you in the back first, you're probably dead. There's not much chance for you to turn around and blow him away. Because Halo's too predictable. Gears is different everytime.

By the way, Gears isn't all that futuristic. It's just on a different planet.

sc_kid42

So basically you would rather be beaten by luck than skill? (if you like shooting a guy 6 times in the back then he shoots you once and you die thats basically what you are saying) I would rather know I killed a guy because I'm better than him than get lucky and kill him basically on accident.

Join the club. Gears of War multiplayer sucks. I can't believe I played it as long as I did.Trickshot771

[QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Yeah, just like I've beaten a team of four when it was just me and another guy. It's a lot harder to do that in Gears of War than in Halo. Which is realistic.

Also, another thing that keeps Gears of War gamers coming back for more, whether they know it or not, is the unpredictability. How many times have you been seemingly shooting a guy in the back with a shotgun, then he just turns around, shoots you once, and you die?

In Halo, if a guy's shooting you in the back first, you're probably dead. There's not much chance for you to turn around and blow him away. Because Halo's too predictable. Gears is different everytime.

RudeYeT1

You're such a cute parrot say something else :)

Prove me wrong first. You haven't seemed to prove me wrong once.

[QUOTE="Trickshot771"]Join the club. Gears of War multiplayer sucks. I can't believe I played it as long as I did.AtomicBaconBits

If both its multi player sucks and the single player, then how did it get 9.0 or above on almost every gaming site?

[QUOTE="Trickshot771"]Join the club. Gears of War multiplayer sucks. I can't believe I played it as long as I did.AtomicBaconBits

Horrible? I really can't see how you can call a 9.6/10, which is pretty uninamous amongst reviewers (don't be a butt and correct me if it's actually 9.7 or something in that region). To call it horrible is an overstatement. Do you actually own the game or did you play some random level at Gamestop?

[QUOTE="RudeYeT1"][QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Yeah, just like I've beaten a team of four when it was just me and another guy. It's a lot harder to do that in Gears of War than in Halo. Which is realistic.

Also, another thing that keeps Gears of War gamers coming back for more, whether they know it or not, is the unpredictability. How many times have you been seemingly shooting a guy in the back with a shotgun, then he just turns around, shoots you once, and you die?

In Halo, if a guy's shooting you in the back first, you're probably dead. There's not much chance for you to turn around and blow him away. Because Halo's too predictable. Gears is different everytime.

sc_kid42

You're such a cute parrot say something else :)

Prove me wrong first. You haven't seemed to prove me wrong once.

I think you've proven yourself wrong.

[QUOTE="sc_kid42"][QUOTE="RudeYeT1"][QUOTE="sc_kid42"]

Yeah, just like I've beaten a team of four when it was just me and another guy. It's a lot harder to do that in Gears of War than in Halo. Which is realistic.

Also, another thing that keeps Gears of War gamers coming back for more, whether they know it or not, is the unpredictability. How many times have you been seemingly shooting a guy in the back with a shotgun, then he just turns around, shoots you once, and you die?

In Halo, if a guy's shooting you in the back first, you're probably dead. There's not much chance for you to turn around and blow him away. Because Halo's too predictable. Gears is different everytime.

skazbot

You're such a cute parrot say something else :)

Prove me wrong first. You haven't seemed to prove me wrong once.

I think you've proven yourself wrong.

Wow. LOL that made a lot of sense. I'm not going to argue with halo fanboys anymore, but Gears of War broke a lot of records, including some of Halo's. Just remember that when you try to tell me it's a better game.

[QUOTE="AtomicBaconBits"][QUOTE="Trickshot771"]Join the club. Gears of War multiplayer sucks. I can't believe I played it as long as I did.darthzew

Horrible? I really can't see how you can call a 9.6/10, which is pretty uninamous amongst reviewers (don't be a butt and correct me if it's actually 9.7 or something in that region). To call it horrible is an overstatement. Do you actually own the game or did you play some random level at Gamestop?