O.K. so i just watched the video review that they did on heavenly sword for the ps3.... How can they give that game a 8 out of 10? They said that you can beat the game in 6 hours... And from what I watched of the review there is alot of cut scenes and crap... So out of the 6 hours half the time you probably are not even playing the actual game... It basically looks like a hack and slash POS! So my point is that how can they give that game a 8 when they gave blue dragon a JRPG with alot of replay value and like at least 40 hours of gameplay a 6.... Im sorry but i think we have some fanboys at Gamespot... I am looking for some unbiased opinions not some doofy looking middle aged dude that couldn't spot a good game if it slapped him in the face... Well not all of them i guess mainly the 2 that reviewed blue dragon and heavenly sword...
Heavenly Sword, if anything deserves a bit higher than an 8. The review was basically Aaron Thomas talking about how amazing the game is. The only downside he mentions is length.
Seriously it deservesa 8.5.
And Blue Dragon? Have you played that game? It kinda blows... a lot... Let's just hope the FF creator gets Lost Oddesy right.
Oh and btw: Actually people tend to call GS staffers 360 fanboys... I mean... look at Aaron Thomas's latest soapbox post... I don't think he's a PS3 fan...
Log in to comment