This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'd have faith in them.
I mean, all of thier titles have been like this, so for them to do what everyone else is doing, sounds lame to me.Â
i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...adders99
 lol, i think modern warfare is a little more intense than you're making it out to be
WW2 is done. How many times must we go through it. If they had made another one that would have been 1 less copy soldMiguel16
i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...adders99
Yeah modern warfare is as tense as a water pistol fight /end sarcasm
[QUOTE="adders99"]i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...kieran88
Yeah modern warfare is as tense as a water pistol fight /end sarcasm
Tell that to the guys in the sandbox and hope to keep all of your teeth.
they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".
bigbon_basic
It would also be boring as hell.Â
[QUOTE="bigbon_basic"]they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".
Santas_Hitman
It would also be boring as hell.Â
I know what you mean, but if they did things just right, it might not be quite as bad as you might think.  Use a cover system like Gears of War, and implement some sort of "active reload" to make the slow reloading times a bit more interesting and less tedious. It could likely feel much like using the sniper rifle in Gears of War exclusively. A civil war game would certainly be paced much differently than the games we're used to, but it doesn't have to be a terrible game.
[QUOTE="Santas_Hitman"][QUOTE="bigbon_basic"]they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".
Hashbrowns
It would also be boring as hell.Â
I know what you mean, but if they did things just right, it might not be quite as bad as you might think.  Use a cover system like Gears of War, and implement some sort of "active reload" to make the slow reloading times a bit more interesting and less tedious. It could likely feel much like using the sniper rifle in Gears of War exclusively. A civil war game would certainly be paced much differently than the games we're used to, but it doesn't have to be a terrible game.
Â
i t hink if the game wouldbe successful it would have to be structured kind of like starcraft / c and c type game
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment