i knew COD4 would be like this!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for adders99
adders99

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 adders99
Member since 2005 • 2623 Posts
i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...
Avatar image for jonathan_rector
jonathan_rector

2734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 jonathan_rector
Member since 2003 • 2734 Posts

I'd have faith in them.

I mean, all of thier titles have been like this, so for them to do what everyone else is doing, sounds lame to me. 

Avatar image for Miguel16
Miguel16

6065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Miguel16
Member since 2004 • 6065 Posts
WW2 is done. How many times must we go through it. If they had made another one that would have been 1 less copy sold
Avatar image for b_rad247
b_rad247

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 b_rad247
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

i think that COD needed a refreshing change. don't get me wrong cos i love WW2 games.

i think that they will keep the whole large- scale- troop- war thing.

looking forward to it tho

Avatar image for V_Zarnold_N
V_Zarnold_N

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 V_Zarnold_N
Member since 2006 • 1272 Posts
im glad that its different i will probably buy it now. WW 2 is done... it was done after the 50th MoH game and guess what WW 2 hasnt changed any since the last call of duty so how much would have changed in CoD 4 if they would have had it in WW 2? besides its still CoD not R6 so dont worry
Avatar image for slayer85
slayer85

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 slayer85
Member since 2006 • 926 Posts

i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...adders99

 lol, i think modern warfare is a little more intense than you're making it out to be

Avatar image for darkfox101
darkfox101

7055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 darkfox101
Member since 2004 • 7055 Posts
WW2 is done. How many times must we go through it. If they had made another one that would have been 1 less copy soldMiguel16
Avatar image for kieran88
kieran88

2273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 kieran88
Member since 2004 • 2273 Posts

i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...adders99

Yeah modern warfare is as tense as a water pistol fight /end sarcasm

Avatar image for bigbon_basic
bigbon_basic

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bigbon_basic
Member since 2003 • 1573 Posts

 

 

 

 

 

they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".

Avatar image for herbie12282
herbie12282

2861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 herbie12282
Member since 2002 • 2861 Posts
i just hope this game is less linear.  CoD games are so scripted it feels like i'm playing an on rails shootem up like Time Crisis sometimes.  i want big open maps like the trainyard level in 2. The whole game should be that way.
Avatar image for herbie12282
herbie12282

2861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#11 herbie12282
Member since 2002 • 2861 Posts

[QUOTE="adders99"]i didnt want them to make a COD4 set in modern times because you just cant have the magnitude of battles that you had in WW2. i mean now its all go in with infared and shoot people through walls and stuff and its not in your face action, istead you kill some you cant even see! i hope they make it so that there is still heaps of troops in the game instead of like a 6 man team and what not...kieran88

Yeah modern warfare is as tense as a water pistol fight /end sarcasm

Tell that to the guys in the sandbox and hope to keep all of your teeth.

Avatar image for Santas_Hitman
Santas_Hitman

1003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Santas_Hitman
Member since 2004 • 1003 Posts

they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".

bigbon_basic

It would also be boring as hell. 

Avatar image for Hashbrowns
Hashbrowns

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Hashbrowns
Member since 2003 • 492 Posts
[QUOTE="bigbon_basic"]

they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".

Santas_Hitman

It would also be boring as hell. 

I know what you mean, but if they did things just right, it might not be quite as bad as you might think.  Use a cover system like Gears of War, and implement some sort of "active reload" to make the slow reloading times a bit more interesting and less tedious.  It could likely feel much like using the sniper rifle in Gears of War exclusively.  A civil war game would certainly be paced much differently than the games we're used to, but it doesn't have to be a terrible game.

Avatar image for apc2007
apc2007

1557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 apc2007
Member since 2006 • 1557 Posts

Yes i think that 2

Avatar image for slayer85
slayer85

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 slayer85
Member since 2006 • 926 Posts
[QUOTE="Santas_Hitman"][QUOTE="bigbon_basic"]

they should made a civil war game....Now that would of been "NEW".

Hashbrowns

It would also be boring as hell. 

I know what you mean, but if they did things just right, it might not be quite as bad as you might think.  Use a cover system like Gears of War, and implement some sort of "active reload" to make the slow reloading times a bit more interesting and less tedious.  It could likely feel much like using the sniper rifle in Gears of War exclusively.  A civil war game would certainly be paced much differently than the games we're used to, but it doesn't have to be a terrible game.

 

i t hink if the game wouldbe successful it would have to be structured kind of like starcraft / c and c type game