I need to understand something(dont know if this is the right board for this)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GreasyFetus69
GreasyFetus69

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GreasyFetus69
Member since 2007 • 1225 Posts
So Microsoft owns Rare now. Ok when Rare was owned by Nintendo and made all the amazing games for N64 like Goldeneye, Conker, Perfect Dark, Banjo etc. Was it a separte part of Rare that made Donkey Kong and Star Fox? Because they are still owned by Nintendo and are stillNintendo games. I dont get it. Did Nintendo just get to keep the rights of those franchises with some sort of deal or something?
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
conker was on the old xbox, and the 360 is getting a new banjo game, so its all good the M$ camp.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
and Perfect Dark Zero was a 360 launch game, and dont listen to people who say its crap, its surprisly good.
Avatar image for GreasyFetus69
GreasyFetus69

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GreasyFetus69
Member since 2007 • 1225 Posts
Yea I know that. i am asking why Star Fox and Donkey Kong are still Nintendo games. My guess is that they were a different part of Rareware, and Nintendo just still has the rights. I guess you misinterpreted my question. Im not complaining or anything, and saying they should be Microsoft now, cause they shouldnt. Im just asking how it works.
Avatar image for Scion68
Scion68

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Scion68
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
A lot of times, a company will give up the rights to certain properties in order to make a break from their parent company. Nintendo probably kept the rights to those titles when the two companies seperated.
Avatar image for GreasyFetus69
GreasyFetus69

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GreasyFetus69
Member since 2007 • 1225 Posts

A lot of times, a company will give up the rights to certain properties in order to make a break from their parent company. Nintendo probably kept the rights to those titles when the two companies seperated.Scion68

Yea thats what I thought. But it still says Rare on the new Starfoxes and Donkey Kongs I think.

Avatar image for zaphod_b
zaphod_b

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 zaphod_b
Member since 2002 • 2201 Posts
Starfox was a Rare creation that Nintendo held the rights to. Donkey Kong was a Nintendo creation they farmed out to Rare. Nintendo still holds the rights to both. I don't believe that Rare was involved in the last two Starfox games, but I could be wrong. If there was an existing contract for them to develop those games for Nintendo, they would have still needed to complete the games despite being bought by Microsoft.
Avatar image for zaphod_b
zaphod_b

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 zaphod_b
Member since 2002 • 2201 Posts
Starfox: Assault was developed by Namco. Starfox Adventures was the last to be developed by Rare I believe.
Avatar image for GreasyFetus69
GreasyFetus69

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GreasyFetus69
Member since 2007 • 1225 Posts
Oh ok, thanks guys.