If the new xbox 360 has hdmi is that mean it has better graphics then the white?

If the new xbox 360 has hdmi is that mean it has better graphics then the white?orrytur

no better than 1080p, which it already supports if your tv does, just think of it as all of the component cables rolled into one input instead of 5 colored ones

Ok so the hdmi dont change the graphicsorrytur

HDMI provides a digital signal whereas the component cables provide an analog signal. Digital w/ 1080P is best. It depends if your HDTV accepts 1080P and/or 720P and of course a HDMI output. Digital w/ 1080P is a flicker free image because the human eye can't detect movement beyond 1080P.

Graphics wise it should look the same, except, digital w/ 1080P is easier on the eyes.

Ok so the hdmi dont change the graphicsorrytur

HDMI only changes the way it is outputted to a TV or Monitor, it will not change the graphical capability's of the hardware. 

and yes my HDTV supports hdmiorrytur

what do you mean?orrytur

Lol, he's just being sarcasitc. A lot of people seem to think HDMI is a huge deal and changes the whole way you play the game. Honestly, there really isn't a big difference between HDMI and Component/VGA. If you can use it, go ahead, it is supposed to be the best, but don't expect the difference to be night and day. Hope that helps a bit.

perfect answer:

HDMI provides a digital signal whereas the component cables provide an analog signal. Digital w/ 1080P is best. It depends if your HDTV accepts 1080P and/or 720P and of course a HDMI output. Digital w/ 1080P is a flicker free image because the human eye can't detect movement beyond 1080P.

Graphics wise it should look the same, except, digital w/ 1080P is easier on the eyes.

TALISMANJ

perfect answer:

[QUOTE="TALISMANJ"]

HDMI provides a digital signal whereas the component cables provide an analog signal. Digital w/ 1080P is best. It depends if your HDTV accepts 1080P and/or 720P and of course a HDMI output. Digital w/ 1080P is a flicker free image because the human eye can't detect movement beyond 1080P.

Graphics wise it should look the same, except, digital w/ 1080P is easier on the eyes.

OfficialBed

Yeah I'd like to know how that's the perfect answer since it has statements that are a) wrong, or b) strictly opinion

a) wrong:

Digital w/ 1080P is a flicker free image because the human eye can't detect movement beyond 1080P.

TALISMANJ

- This is simply wrong. 1080P is flicker free not because it is 1080P versus something like 720P, but rather because it is a progressive video feed rather than interlaced. Progressive feeds refresh the entire image each cycle, whereas interlaced feeds refresh every other line every cycle.

Digital w/ 1080P is easier on the eyes.

TALISMANJ

- A digital versus analog 1080P signal makes no demonstrable difference on the eyes in terms of comfort.

b) strictly opinion

Digital w/ 1080P is best.

TALISMANJ

- Many audio/video-philes will argue that componant video connection gives a better picture in 1080P (or any resolution) than a digital connection such as HDMI. Simply go to avsforums.com and do little reading to confirm this. They say that HDMI gives a harsher picture than componant, which gives a softer color palette. This is most pronounced on plasma screens. Personally, I can't tell the difference, but that's what video enthusiasts seem to claim.

If the new xbox 360 has hdmi is that mean it has better graphics then the white?orrytur

[QUOTE="orrytur"]If the new xbox 360 has hdmi is that mean it has better graphics then the white?Riot429

It doesn't change the resolution. The 360 already supports 1080P resolution through componant.