Is Call of Duty good because it's easy?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Making_Pudding
Making_Pudding

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Making_Pudding
Member since 2008 • 518 Posts

This concerns Call of Duty's multiplayer. I've come across some PC gamers that call the game "easy", and I'm tempted to agree with them.

This is a game in which the noobiest of the noobs can kill the best of the best with just a spot of luck. A game in which the noobiest of the noobs can (with a little talent) become one of the best in a month, because that's all the time it takes to learn the few intricacies within the game; grenade spots and choke points, which perks are great, which suck, claymore placing, etc, etc. The game is easy to learn and easy to master, at least when compared to games like TF2 and Gears of War (both of which I dislike, by the way).

Is it really okay that the level 1 whose butt you kicked today might kick your butt the month after?

Avatar image for Logan1616
Logan1616

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Logan1616
Member since 2008 • 3424 Posts

This concerns Call of Duty's multiplayer. I've come across some PC gamers that call the game "easy", and I'm tempted to agree with them.

This is a game in which the noobiest of the noobs can kill the best of the best with just a spot of luck. A game in which the noobiest of the noobs can (with a little talent) become one of the best in a month, because that's all the time it takes to learn the few intricacies within the game; grenade spots and choke points, which perks are great, which suck, claymore placing, etc, etc. The game is easy to learn and easy to master, at least when compared to games like TF2 and Gears of War (both of which I dislike, by the way).

Is it really okay that the level 1 whose butt you kicked today might kick your butt the month after?

Making_Pudding
That doesn't seem like a problem, rather a compliment. I take that as CoD being balanced. I find Gears and TF2 plagued with glitchers and they're just not as complete to me.
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
[QUOTE="Making_Pudding"]

Logan1616

That doesn't seem like a problem, rather a compliment. I take that as CoD being balanced. I find Gears and TF2 plagued with glitchers and they're just not as complete to me.

I haven't noticed that many glitchers on TF2 but there's a few. Anyway i think overall it's too easy to kill and get killed. I thought it was a fun game for a while but it just became so annoying. Dying by random grenades and non-stop three bullets to kill you. I had fun for around 200 hours which was great but afterwards it just got too annoying to enjoy.

Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts
So you're saying that new players can become worthy opponents with some experience? Wow, that sounds horrible. I bet the super freaks that play the game for 16 hours a day to pwn the n00bs are crying in their corners.
Avatar image for Tsunami23
Tsunami23

1352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Tsunami23
Member since 2004 • 1352 Posts
Call of Duty is fun because it is easy. Fun =/= Good. That being said, CoD still is a good game... :D
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts

FAILvp22

How's what he said "fail" why can't people at least give reasons? Well guess what your fail fails.

Avatar image for helvis93
helvis93

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 helvis93
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
i too find it easy. but i wouldn't call that a bad thing. I like to play it with my friends. It is pretty irritating getting killed by 10 year olds though.
Avatar image for vp22
vp22

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 vp22
Member since 2008 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="vp22"]FAILcraigalan23

How's what he said "fail" why can't people at least give reasons? Well guess what your fail fails.

:(
Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15062 Posts
I think it's good because it's fun, but the online is kind of easy. The single player on the other hand is not, not for me anyways (veteran of course).
Avatar image for Hitch_Blade_VII
Hitch_Blade_VII

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Hitch_Blade_VII
Member since 2009 • 68 Posts
Dont care. Divert all the noobs to cod to easy kill eachother. so the rest of us can play halo and gears in skilled peace.
Avatar image for ROBBYBEAR1985
ROBBYBEAR1985

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#12 ROBBYBEAR1985
Member since 2008 • 564 Posts
I think everything the TS is stating about CoD's multiplayer sounds like BALANCE to me. Why should people have to dedicate so much of their life just compete with teens or younger who may not have a life?
Avatar image for lil_d_mack_314
lil_d_mack_314

13969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 lil_d_mack_314
Member since 2006 • 13969 Posts
good post TC. my same question came up in me and my lil bros discussion while playing COD MW. I said the same thing you were saying but his response was "it takes even greater skill to NOT be killed by the n00bs." i listened and understood. the game is balanced, thats why i love it. mastering that game is good (imho) it makes the games more fun. not just playing and completely blowing other people out, if that did happen id get bored of it. and playing HC modes isnt any easier because one bullet can kill and if your not paying attention any one can kill you "noob" or "master". as for random nades at the beginning of a match...seriously if your not a n00b and still get pwned by random nades....thats a FAIL.
Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts
No, it's good because it's fun.
Avatar image for JohnnySN1P3R
JohnnySN1P3R

1916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 JohnnySN1P3R
Member since 2008 • 1916 Posts
Dont care. Divert all the noobs to cod to easy kill eachother. so the rest of us can play halo and gears in skilled peace. Hitch_Blade_VII
Because we all know how Halo takes oh so much skill.
Avatar image for xmen1414
xmen1414

1948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 xmen1414
Member since 2006 • 1948 Posts

[QUOTE="vp22"]FAILcraigalan23

How's what he said "fail" why can't people at least give reasons? Well guess what your fail fails.

I agree his fail fails cause not only does he have no reason hes gonna get moded for distrupitive posting for all caps and one word!
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#17 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
sounds like you've got a bit of a chip on your shoulder to be honest, u used the word 'noobs' way too much for me to take u seriously
Avatar image for torontomapleafs
torontomapleafs

2019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 torontomapleafs
Member since 2006 • 2019 Posts

It's because all you have to do is put mp40 and put juggernaut on and no matter what your skill level is you'll own. Still a great game although it can be frustrating online, but all games are.

Avatar image for gijerky
gijerky

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 gijerky
Member since 2006 • 74 Posts
[QUOTE="Hitch_Blade_VII"]Dont care. Divert all the noobs to cod to easy kill eachother. so the rest of us can play halo and gears in skilled peace. JohnnySN1P3R
Because we all know how Halo takes oh so much skill.

lol
Avatar image for ownzone55
ownzone55

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ownzone55
Member since 2007 • 557 Posts

Its an easy game to pick up and simple fun. It is true its pretty easy, ive notice lots of my freinds 1st time they played, there score was not bad.

Avatar image for Lucpus
Lucpus

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Lucpus
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts
of course it's okay so long as you're having fun
Avatar image for raylewisnfl52
raylewisnfl52

7146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 raylewisnfl52
Member since 2005 • 7146 Posts

This concerns Call of Duty's multiplayer. I've come across some PC gamers that call the game "easy", and I'm tempted to agree with them.

This is a game in which the noobiest of the noobs can kill the best of the best with just a spot of luck. A game in which the noobiest of the noobs can (with a little talent) become one of the best in a month, because that's all the time it takes to learn the few intricacies within the game; grenade spots and choke points, which perks are great, which suck, claymore placing, etc, etc. The game is easy to learn and easy to master, at least when compared to games like TF2 and Gears of War (both of which I dislike, by the way).

Is it really okay that the level 1 whose butt you kicked today might kick your butt the month after?

Making_Pudding
I actually agree with you that most people think its really fun and good cause almost everyone can be good at it. All it takes is you to be at good spot and you get a kill easy or just though up a random grenade and you will get a kill.
Avatar image for a_beautiful_lie
a_beautiful_lie

507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 a_beautiful_lie
Member since 2003 • 507 Posts
No.
Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts
u can say anything is too easy. it is a great game because it is easy to master.
Avatar image for KamikazeDonut
KamikazeDonut

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 145

User Lists: 1

#25 KamikazeDonut
Member since 2008 • 3016 Posts
It's easy to get kills but it's not easy to win my only problem is that some of the perks are a little cheap (stopping power, martyrdom and juggernaut)
Avatar image for COD4_Shinedown
COD4_Shinedown

5673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 COD4_Shinedown
Member since 2008 • 5673 Posts
I agree with everything who mentioned a little thing called balance. if you get killed by someone that's level 1, what's the big deal there? They killed you, get over it. I think its good that the COD games are easy enough to pick up and play because without not that many would stick with it. I mean who wants to have to play a game for hours upon hours before they can do any good at it?
Avatar image for Th3-UnS33n
Th3-UnS33n

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Th3-UnS33n
Member since 2008 • 391 Posts
Not really. Sure, you can be good at it soon enough, but to be great you need a combination of incredible technique and cheap tricks.
Avatar image for donny666
donny666

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 donny666
Member since 2007 • 422 Posts

It is easy to get a kill in CoD4. It isn't as easy to get streaks.

I find it odd that people enjoy TF2 so much. That has to be the most balance issues of any online game I have played to date.

Avatar image for a55a55inx
a55a55inx

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#30 a55a55inx
Member since 2004 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="Hitch_Blade_VII"]Dont care. Divert all the noobs to cod to easy kill eachother. so the rest of us can play halo and gears in skilled peace. JohnnySN1P3R
Because we all know how Halo takes oh so much skill.

um... yes. It does require a lot more skill to kill good players in halo than it does in CoD... A really good player can win most of his/her confrontations regardless of wether he see's the other player first or not... In CoD, anyone who can fire the weapon has a good chance of killing a far more experienced player... the same can't be said for halo.

Avatar image for Making_Pudding
Making_Pudding

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Making_Pudding
Member since 2008 • 518 Posts
Okay, umm...Maybe I wasn't clear as to what the purpose of this post was, so let me clarify for the cavemen in the audience. The point I'm trying to make here isn't a positive one, but it isn't a negative one. The fact that these games are so simple is both a blessing and a curse. Let's draw up a little scenario here, shall we? Bear with me. So, here's Toasty Peanut. He's a level 1 on Call of Duty 4, but dreams of someday being a level 2. Naturally, he knows how to shoot and aim, but lacks experience as to which routes enemies are bound to take, where enemies spawn, and how to throw grenades correctly. He goes into his very first Team Deathmatch. It's on Crash. He rushes out, past the blue house and is stopped dead by a grenade. Intrigued, he looks at his kill cam. Someone threw a grenade over a dumpster and it just so happened to hit him as he was running. He takes a mental note. He proceeds to get his butt handed to him for the rest of the match and ends up with 1 kill and 16 deaths. He was lucky to find a level 18 facing a different direction, so he took the shot and killed him, giving him his only kill of the match. He decides to go play some Search and Destroy, which sounds interesting. A few matches later, Crash comes up again. This time, he's on the Marine side. He remembers the grenade over the dumpster, so he decides to try it out for himself. He lobs a crazy grenade over it and waits. 2 seconds pass. Boom. 3 kills. He thanks the heavens. He just killed that dumb level 29 that kept killing him last match and two new guys not unlike himself. Glory is his at last. The moral of the story? There is no moral to the story. It was my experience in Call of Duty 4 with my first gamertag, one year ago. I killed 3 people that I otherwise would have had no chance against by using a cheap tactic. "Easy" can become "cheap" really quickly, and that's the one thing that bothers me about these games.
Avatar image for RebornInFlames
RebornInFlames

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#32 RebornInFlames
Member since 2006 • 1192 Posts
Ah for a sec I thought you meant the SP, and I was a bit confused as Veteran mode bends you over and spanks you I know what you mean - any time I play against high prestige players I prepare for a hail of random grenades. The thing is any game can be cheap if @$$holes play it. My advice is to play with friends that you know won't use such tactics (but it's hard to get a large game of just your friends, which is why I, like you, don't play that particular MP much). If you want a game that is remarkably balanced and lacks cheap tactics try the FEAR multiplayer, but good luck finding a match :P
Avatar image for donny666
donny666

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 donny666
Member since 2007 • 422 Posts

Okay, umm...Maybe I wasn't clear as to what the purpose of this post was, so let me clarify for the cavemen in the audience. The point I'm trying to make here isn't a positive one, but it isn't a negative one. The fact that these games are so simple is both a blessing and a curse. Let's draw up a little scenario here, shall we? Bear with me. So, here's Toasty Peanut. He's a level 1 on Call of Duty 4, but dreams of someday being a level 2. Naturally, he knows how to shoot and aim, but lacks experience as to which routes enemies are bound to take, where enemies spawn, and how to throw grenades correctly. He goes into his very first Team Deathmatch. It's on Crash. He rushes out, past the blue house and is stopped dead by a grenade. Intrigued, he looks at his kill cam. Someone threw a grenade over a dumpster and it just so happened to hit him as he was running. He takes a mental note. He proceeds to get his butt handed to him for the rest of the match and ends up with 1 kill and 16 deaths. He was lucky to find a level 18 facing a different direction, so he took the shot and killed him, giving him his only kill of the match. He decides to go play some Search and Destroy, which sounds interesting. A few matches later, Crash comes up again. This time, he's on the Marine side. He remembers the grenade over the dumpster, so he decides to try it out for himself. He lobs a crazy grenade over it and waits. 2 seconds pass. Boom. 3 kills. He thanks the heavens. He just killed that dumb level 29 that kept killing him last match and two new guys not unlike himself. Glory is his at last. The moral of the story? There is no moral to the story. It was my experience in Call of Duty 4 with my first gamertag, one year ago. I killed 3 people that I otherwise would have had no chance against by using a cheap tactic. "Easy" can become "cheap" really quickly, and that's the one thing that bothers me about these games.Making_Pudding

Um yeah, that isn't because the game is "easy" it is because you were playing agains inexperienced players. So yes, I guess in so far as the skill level of the other team goes the game is easy. Had you been playing against people who knew what they were doing you would have only wasted a prefectly good grenade.

Now the grenade launcher is kinda (or was kinda, it has been a while) silly but every FPS has something cheap like that honestly. It is just something you have to decide to deal with and enjoy the otherwise great game or walk away.

Avatar image for anevilMONK3Y
anevilMONK3Y

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 anevilMONK3Y
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

um... yes. It does require a lot more skill to kill good players in halo than it does in CoD... A really good player can win most of his/her confrontations regardless of wether he see's the other player first or not... In CoD, anyone who can fire the weapon has a good chance of killing a far more experienced player... the same can't be said for halo.

a55a55inx

In Halo your internet connection determines your skill. Aside form the auto-aim BS, being host equals the god of gamers.

Avatar image for hobo290
hobo290

408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 hobo290
Member since 2007 • 408 Posts

Yea I know what you mean. That's why I don't play those anymore.

I play the more skillful games like Gears of War 1 and 2, Guitar Hero Series, Rock Band, Fighting Games, or Strategy games like Age of Empires III.

I hate it when people think they're good at games like CoD and Halo games. They take minimal skill!

Avatar image for Morning_Revival
Morning_Revival

3475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Morning_Revival
Member since 2008 • 3475 Posts
That goes to show that the game is balanced. Honestly, I dont find it easy. You die in 2 or 3 shots so you have to constantly watch your back.
Avatar image for Morning_Revival
Morning_Revival

3475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Morning_Revival
Member since 2008 • 3475 Posts
Okay, umm...Maybe I wasn't clear as to what the purpose of this post was, so let me clarify for the cavemen in the audience. The point I'm trying to make here isn't a positive one, but it isn't a negative one. The fact that these games are so simple is both a blessing and a curse. Let's draw up a little scenario here, shall we? Bear with me. So, here's Toasty Peanut. He's a level 1 on Call of Duty 4, but dreams of someday being a level 2. Naturally, he knows how to shoot and aim, but lacks experience as to which routes enemies are bound to take, where enemies spawn, and how to throw grenades correctly. He goes into his very first Team Deathmatch. It's on Crash. He rushes out, past the blue house and is stopped dead by a grenade. Intrigued, he looks at his kill cam. Someone threw a grenade over a dumpster and it just so happened to hit him as he was running. He takes a mental note. He proceeds to get his butt handed to him for the rest of the match and ends up with 1 kill and 16 deaths. He was lucky to find a level 18 facing a different direction, so he took the shot and killed him, giving him his only kill of the match. He decides to go play some Search and Destroy, which sounds interesting. A few matches later, Crash comes up again. This time, he's on the Marine side. He remembers the grenade over the dumpster, so he decides to try it out for himself. He lobs a crazy grenade over it and waits. 2 seconds pass. Boom. 3 kills. He thanks the heavens. He just killed that dumb level 29 that kept killing him last match and two new guys not unlike himself. Glory is his at last. The moral of the story? There is no moral to the story. It was my experience in Call of Duty 4 with my first gamertag, one year ago. I killed 3 people that I otherwise would have had no chance against by using a cheap tactic. "Easy" can become "cheap" really quickly, and that's the one thing that bothers me about these games.Making_Pudding
What are you doing running out blindly in the damn game... Obviously youre going to be killed.
Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

Okay, umm...Maybe I wasn't clear as to what the purpose of this post was, so let me clarify for the cavemen in the audience. The point I'm trying to make here isn't a positive one, but it isn't a negative one. The fact that these games are so simple is both a blessing and a curse. Let's draw up a little scenario here, shall we? Bear with me. So, here's Toasty Peanut. He's a level 1 on Call of Duty 4, but dreams of someday being a level 2. Naturally, he knows how to shoot and aim, but lacks experience as to which routes enemies are bound to take, where enemies spawn, and how to throw grenades correctly. He goes into his very first Team Deathmatch. It's on Crash. He rushes out, past the blue house and is stopped dead by a grenade. Intrigued, he looks at his kill cam. Someone threw a grenade over a dumpster and it just so happened to hit him as he was running. He takes a mental note. He proceeds to get his butt handed to him for the rest of the match and ends up with 1 kill and 16 deaths. He was lucky to find a level 18 facing a different direction, so he took the shot and killed him, giving him his only kill of the match. He decides to go play some Search and Destroy, which sounds interesting. A few matches later, Crash comes up again. This time, he's on the Marine side. He remembers the grenade over the dumpster, so he decides to try it out for himself. He lobs a crazy grenade over it and waits. 2 seconds pass. Boom. 3 kills. He thanks the heavens. He just killed that dumb level 29 that kept killing him last match and two new guys not unlike himself. Glory is his at last. The moral of the story? There is no moral to the story. It was my experience in Call of Duty 4 with my first gamertag, one year ago. I killed 3 people that I otherwise would have had no chance against by using a cheap tactic. "Easy" can become "cheap" really quickly, and that's the one thing that bothers me about these games.Making_Pudding

Shouldn't the level 29 know not to run through that area to avoid the grenade toss?

Avatar image for a55a55inx
a55a55inx

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#39 a55a55inx
Member since 2004 • 4188 Posts
[QUOTE="a55a55inx"]

um... yes. It does require a lot more skill to kill good players in halo than it does in CoD... A really good player can win most of his/her confrontations regardless of wether he see's the other player first or not... In CoD, anyone who can fire the weapon has a good chance of killing a far more experienced player... the same can't be said for halo.

anevilMONK3Y

In Halo your internet connection determines your skill. Aside form the auto-aim BS, being host equals the god of gamers.

To be honest, I can't tell who is the host most of the time in Halo 3. It was pretty easy to spot in halo 2, but this time around, I see very little host advantage(if any),and since hosts are chosen at random, why is it that I can win most of the games I play? ( I mean, I know my internet connection isn't that great to be determined as the host every match)Plus, auto-aim exists on most fps games on the 360, including CoD...

I can understand that if you don't play halo 3 that much and remain playing against lower level individuals, it may seem as if there is no skill required to play, but once you reach the higher ranked players, perfecting the BR and Sniper rifle become necessary

Avatar image for thesinecura
thesinecura

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 thesinecura
Member since 2009 • 50 Posts
I enjoy it the way it is. Sometimes you get on the bad side of luck, but who cares? The game is fun.
Avatar image for Ottosmann
Ottosmann

7058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#41 Ottosmann
Member since 2006 • 7058 Posts
IMO, its a good thing, it makes it accessible.
Avatar image for xfactor19990
xfactor19990

10917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 xfactor19990
Member since 2004 • 10917 Posts
[QUOTE="Making_Pudding"]

This concerns Call of Duty's multiplayer. I've come across some PC gamers that call the game "easy", and I'm tempted to agree with them.

This is a game in which the noobiest of the noobs can kill the best of the best with just a spot of luck. A game in which the noobiest of the noobs can (with a little talent) become one of the best in a month, because that's all the time it takes to learn the few intricacies within the game; grenade spots and choke points, which perks are great, which suck, claymore placing, etc, etc. The game is easy to learn and easy to master, at least when compared to games like TF2 and Gears of War (both of which I dislike, by the way).

Is it really okay that the level 1 whose butt you kicked today might kick your butt the month after?

Logan1616
glitches in TF2? I have not encountered that problem, however COD is odd to me this is my first console version That doesn't seem like a problem, rather a compliment. I take that as CoD being balanced. I find Gears and TF2 plagued with glitchers and they're just not as complete to me.

Avatar image for mr__gameboy
mr__gameboy

553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 mr__gameboy
Member since 2006 • 553 Posts
well i have the game informer where they preview call of duty 4 and they say they meant for the multiplayer to be this way. they didnt want online achievements because it would hinder the gameplay, which i totally agree with. then they go on to say they want everyone to be able to kill. the point is for good players not to die in order to get streaks which lead to radar, artillery, and helicopter. which is what any player should really be working for in a match. i also like the one or two shot kills. its way more realistic than halo in which it takes a full clip to kill someone. you can shoot someone in halo and they have time to turn around, see you and still have time to buck off some shots. and if you havent guessed i prefer call of duty 4.
Avatar image for CrazyGamer02149
CrazyGamer02149

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 CrazyGamer02149
Member since 2008 • 216 Posts
ya ur right about some things..like perks, guns, or mayb grenade placemnts cld b the reason u die...but COD takes a little skill... but still a little aggrivating
Avatar image for ATastyBurger
ATastyBurger

416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ATastyBurger
Member since 2008 • 416 Posts
Yeah, if you're even a little good at Halo or Gears, you're gonna kill at Call of Duty.
Avatar image for cokecanw00t
cokecanw00t

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#46 cokecanw00t
Member since 2008 • 96 Posts
CoD online is about skill if you can realize it. You have to mostly make sure you see your opponent first, which you have to have skill do. What skill do you need to see your opponent you ask? Well let me tell you, first it's all about the location you put yourself in which requires skill to find and make full use of a designated location. Two is how fast you can move your sights on your opponent for the kill, which also requires skill. Three is all about how you use your weapons, an example is maybe you have claymores set up at a location that is near where your enemy is clustered atm, for one you will have to have the skill to sneak up on your enemy's and lay the claymores, and sneak away alive and wait for the precise time to detinate. All of these things are just some of the minor things that require skill. If I am wrong will someone please correct me?
Avatar image for Cloud_Insurance
Cloud_Insurance

3279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Cloud_Insurance
Member since 2008 • 3279 Posts

Yes, its an easy game, because most people that play it are doing it wrong. People play CoD4 like a run and gun shooter, when its not designed that way. The twitch gameplay and the fact that every weapon is pretty much 1 hit kill, are signs that the game is meant to be a tactical shooter.

Essentially, if you encounter another player, it comes down to who sees the other first and fires first. Sure, some accuracy is required, by its not of critical importance, like it is in a game like Halo. But most people don't have the patience to play the game using tactics and patience. When they spawn, they are eager to engage the enemy as quickly as possible.

Thats why if you use your brain, play with patience and a little bit of caution, you can straight up dominate an entire team. Things like airstrikes and the helicopter runs are supposed to be rare, but if you play a public game, they are pretty much nonstop. The entire idea behind the game is holding certain strategic points (high ground, choke points, whatever), which give you an advantage over the other team. Its not camping, its not to be looked down upon. Camping is when you hide in an obscure area where you have the element of surprise and thus can easily get the drop on the player who stumbles upon you. In Cod4 anyone who plays the game, KNOWS where the ideal places are.

Compare this to a game like Halo or Resistance or TF2. All of these games are quite different from each other, but they all take more skill than CoD4. In these games, encounters with other players comes down to skill, its based on your weapon accuracy (usually headshots) and assessing the situation and using the appropriate weapon and tactics to win. In these games, if you get the drop on the other player, it doesn't neccessarily mean you'll kill him. Better players are capable of being caught off guard, recovering, and killing their opponent (this is not always the case of course, you can't really recover from getting hit by a rocket for example). In a game like CoD4, since weapon damage is so high, if you are surprised, you can't recover, because you are already dead.

This isn't a bashing of CoD4, its just a different type of game, thats all. Some people enjoy its accessibility, while other FPS fans enjoy games where you have to put in the hours and the effort to become good at the game.

Avatar image for cokecanw00t
cokecanw00t

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#48 cokecanw00t
Member since 2008 • 96 Posts

Yes, its an easy game, because most people that play it are doing it wrong. People play CoD4 like a run and gun shooter, when its not designed that way. The twitch gameplay and the fact that every weapon is pretty much 1 hit kill, are signs that the game is meant to be a tactical shooter.

Essentially, if you encounter another player, it comes down to who sees the other first and fires first. Sure, some accuracy is required, by its not of critical importance, like it is in a game like Halo. But most people don't have the patience to play the game using tactics and patience. When they spawn, they are eager to engage the enemy as quickly as possible.

Thats why if you use your brain, play with patience and a little bit of caution, you can straight up dominate an entire team. Things like airstrikes and the helicopter runs are supposed to be rare, but if you play a public game, they are pretty much nonstop. The entire idea behind the game is holding certain strategic points (high ground, choke points, whatever), which give you an advantage over the other team. Its not camping, its not to be looked down upon. Camping is when you hide in an obscure area where you have the element of surprise and thus can easily get the drop on the player who stumbles upon you. In Cod4 anyone who plays the game, KNOWS where the ideal places are.

Compare this to a game like Halo or Resistance or TF2. All of these games are quite different from each other, but they all take more skill than CoD4. In these games, encounters with other players comes down to skill, its based on your weapon accuracy (usually headshots) and assessing the situation and using the appropriate weapon and tactics to win. In these games, if you get the drop on the other player, it doesn't neccessarily mean you'll kill him. Better players are capable of being caught off guard, recovering, and killing their opponent (this is not always the case of course, you can't really recover from getting hit by a rocket for example). In a game like CoD4, since weapon damage is so high, if you are surprised, you can't recover, because you are already dead.

This isn't a bashing of CoD4, its just a different type of game, thats all. Some people enjoy its accessibility, while other FPS fans enjoy games where you have to put in the hours and the effort to become good at the game.

Cloud_Insurance
I completely agree with you that CoD 4 Modern Warfare is more of a Tactical Shooter than a Run and Gun. I don't think that it is as tactical as the Rainbow Six franchise, but I do think it fit under that category.
Avatar image for TheBigTicket21
TheBigTicket21

30875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#49 TheBigTicket21
Member since 2004 • 30875 Posts
it makes it fun, i've only played against a handful of people that just dominate.