Is DLC a marketing ploy?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts

DLC for Fallout 3, GTA 4, Fable 2, I feel like these were all cheaply announced to do nothing but promote sales. I think the case of Fable is the most obvious, as they had such an optimistic release date (before Christmas), now suddenly they buy themselves another month because of "unexpected technical difficulties."

Maybe I read into it wrong, but it just sounded like a cheap way to boost their Christmas sales, and they probably knew all along they would never have it done that soon.

Also another thing about DLC, I don't know if this is intended or if it just works out in their favor, but...it seems like it's also a way to increase sales and reduce the number of used games out there. As is the case with Fable 2, Dead Space, GTA4 I feel like it's worth holding onto these games in case of future DLC or else I would have traded them in a while ago. Not that any of them were bad, but this also reduces the number of used copies in the market. What do you guys think, is DLC in it's own weird way a marketing tactic for companies now?

It's a shame that more of them seem to fall short than deliver on their promises, but not always (Mass Effect/Rock Band/Oblivion...(errr NOT horse armor but the exp packs))

Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts
Of course it's to promote sales, that's the business they are in and as long as the content is worthwhile then keep it coming. If announcing GTA 4 DLC helps people hang on to the game and keep less used copies on store shelves, then I'm all for it.
Avatar image for krovak0000
krovak0000

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 krovak0000
Member since 2004 • 214 Posts
I agree aswell Justice, I felt the same way and it definately seems to work that way, like soda said, even one of my friends was about to trade/sell GTA but kept it for the DLC to see if it's worth while. I'm sure it was mostly planned but requested for a long time now anyway lol
Avatar image for Heartagram_03
Heartagram_03

3697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 Heartagram_03
Member since 2005 • 3697 Posts
Isn't that the point of DLC? The developers want to keep adding fresh new content to keep you busy playing their game. But I can agree with you a little because there has been alot of cheap DLC lately.
Avatar image for ROBBYBEAR1985
ROBBYBEAR1985

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#5 ROBBYBEAR1985
Member since 2008 • 564 Posts
Well DLC is a product so you can expect different marketing ploys involving it. Yes I think it is done to weaken used game trading. I kinda don't understand why some people complain about DLC though. Sure some DLC will not be that great of a deal but others will be great.
Avatar image for drswank
drswank

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 100

User Lists: 0

#6 drswank
Member since 2002 • 943 Posts
I just hate that they expect people to pay $2 for a LBP costume or something cosmetic like that. I'm all for expanding the story and universe though.
Avatar image for Lanezy
Lanezy

2438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Lanezy
Member since 2004 • 2438 Posts

It's definitely a marketing ploy, but I don't have any problems with that.

I don't like the idea of DLC releasing a month or two after the game is realeased.

Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts
I just hate that they expect people to pay $2 for a LBP costume or something cosmetic like that. I'm all for expanding the story and universe though.drswank
I think an example like LBP gear is more of a social experiment than anything, as it lets you tell who is stupid and who isn't.
Avatar image for DopeyDavoid
DopeyDavoid

5375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DopeyDavoid
Member since 2004 • 5375 Posts

What I have a problem with is when they release something thats already on the disc... like in soul calibur. But then again, if they didn't then how could someone else see the dlc equipment online on another character if they didn't have it already.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#10 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
???? DLC is there to give you more in your game... If it increases sale, yay. How is any of that bad or under handed. It's business.
Avatar image for krovak0000
krovak0000

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 krovak0000
Member since 2004 • 214 Posts

Does WoW charge each time they update or patch? Nope.. they have a monthly fee, do PC games charge you to patch/update/mod? Nope, CS for example. Do majority of the games that AS YOU ALL SAY release more for your game and full blown charge you for what they left out in release? YES, why does it make us mad? I mean come on paying money for a soul cal character, or armor update, or slight game fixes or additional game play they left out to begin with, and your saying it's ok for them to full blown charge for maps/armor/simple crap? I never saw WC3, CS, or any MMO for that fact charge ME for an update while I already pay them monthly.

Because microsoft started this DLC charge trend where as before in the gaming world (sorry you young kids wouldn't know?) you could patch/update/mod all at free cost. So explain me that one plz, you all seem so witty and quick tongued since mommy is paying for your live

Avatar image for Avenger1324
Avenger1324

16344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Avenger1324
Member since 2007 • 16344 Posts
Does WoW charge each time they update or patch? Nope.. they have a monthly fee...krovak0000
Bad example using WoW. Yes you get patches for free, as you do through Live, but when they add new content in the form of game expansions (WOTLK) they charge you for that on top of the monthly subscription fee - just the same as MS charges for DLC that adds new content.
???? DLC is there to give you more in your game... If it increases sale, yay. How is any of that bad or under handed. It's business. vashkey
That depends on the nature of the DLC, as there are several types. Good DLC is something that adds something new and desired to the game. For instance new tracks for GH or RB. these are genuine new content that if you want you pay to get. Bad DLC is something that was removed at the last minute so they could charge extra for it - most recent Need For Speed games come with all the cars on the disc, but unless you purchase an unlock code (DLC) you can't access some of them. When new cars are added the DLC is quite large, yet to unlock 6 high performance cars the DLC is tiny (200kb) proving the content is already on the disc you own. Everyone can have their own opinion, but that to me is an underhand tactic, and isn't really giving you more for your game, its just short-selling you when you bought the game initially. The final type of DLC is the type that Rockstar and Lionhead have been trying. They promote the fact that they will be making new content, and it will be coming really soon (but fail to give dates). People rush to buy the game in anticipation they will get something soon that won't be on other platforms (the GTAIV 360 specific DLC), but then it turns out that 8 months later it still hasn't arrived.
Avatar image for krovak0000
krovak0000

214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 krovak0000
Member since 2004 • 214 Posts
Not bad example, they re do classes add content, and patch all the TIME outside of an expansion which is an entierly new zone, all for the monthly cost, so it was a great example thanks, I wasn't referring to expansions as much as how live majority of the time does not release an expansion which if they did would be fine to charge, but they release small bits of content or even just aesthetic things like armor/game looks. So my example still stands, thanks though buddy
Avatar image for Djdiddles77
Djdiddles77

648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#14 Djdiddles77
Member since 2008 • 648 Posts
Since Microsoft makes all their money on selling games and accesories of course it's a marketing ploy. i have yet to purchase a DLC but always wonder if it is actually worth it.
Avatar image for d-high29
d-high29

332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 d-high29
Member since 2008 • 332 Posts

i wish they just included the dlc in the game instead of making you buy more

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#16 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

i think it is, this content used to be included with the initail release to begin with, i remember perfect dark zero was said to have about 15 maps before release, but rare cut 5 out ,

to make dlc

gta san andreas also had exclusive xbox features, included! custom soundtracks any one as well as updated graphics by a bit

also their was afew imes were expansion were on discs, eg gta london ps1

so ya you xcan say that, but you dont want it dont buy it thats that,