least favorite 360 game

mine is cod4. overrated. what about you peopl?

i agree, somehow its just not as good as assassin's creed or deadrising

mass effect was amazing. whats wrong with you?haven79

For you maybe, for me, no. Great story, didnt care for the gun play or the mini missions. Just like you dislike COD4 which was a fun game. Whats wrong with you?

[QUOTE="haven79"]mass effect was amazing. whats wrong with you?mrgab

For you maybe, for me, no. Great story, didnt care for the gun play or the mini missions. Just like you dislike COD4 which was a fun game. Whats wrong with you?

Haha, FOR REAL!!

thats addicting!!

mass effect was amazing. whats wrong with you?haven79

Two Worlds, it looked like it was on the playstation 1. And i bet some kid is going to comment shortley after me posting pictures and saying how two worlds its better then oblivion. Well kid who is going to do that, since the same kid has done it tiwce to me its not. Two Worlds is no were near or will ever be as good as oblivion. on gamespot or ign Two worlds is given a 6.something and oblivion is given a 9.something. As you can see clearly Two Worlds is terrible.Aidan00000

I believe what I did was post pictures of a high ranked ps1 game, and then pictures of two worlds, demonstrating how it did not look like a ps1 game.

I also believe, what I said was the graphics were superior or at least on par with Oblivion's graphics, which they are, said nothing about the game itself.

If you are going to attempt to insult me, at least correctly quote me, thereby demonstrating that you have some basic knowledge of the subject you are attempting to "own". :)

I also only did it once :cry:

As per ratings, if you really feel like using ratings to determine if a game is good or not, it got a 7 on gamespot, which is above average, now, above average =/= terrible, really, only terrible = terrible, if it got a 4, perhaps, a 3, definitely, but an above average score does not equate to terrible. Besides, scores are useless points of comparison when attempt to disassemble opinion, realistically, I never went into your feelings on the gameplay, just simply decimated your attempt to call the graphics "playstation 1", and your brilliant story of how your random friend online felt they were the same.

You can hate the game, hate the mechanics, hate the voice-overs, but, posting things you know are simply incorrect is just asking for a quick comparative sample to demonstrate how wrong you truly are.

Cod4, r6v2, and burnout paradise. Couldn't get into any of them and completing the game was like pulling teeth for cod4. I'm 75% done with r6v2 but it's on the back burner to Overlord (love that game).nitroracer82

...

Those are like the three best games for the platform...

Bomberman: Act Zero.

If you didn't say it, you havn't played it.

For me its cod4 because it just felt like cod2 with better graphics and also the ea sports games because every year they feel like they're getting more and more arcade-like

Madden NFL 08, it was such a waste of money that I couldn't bring myself to buy a game for two months.

Pretty soon my least favorite game will be GTA4 though. Don't argue it with me just accept that I've never liked any of the GTA games.

Army of two and Gears of War are my least favorite...

I could readily summon a list of titles that I played and in fact did not like but many of those consist of games I knew I wouldn't like; genres that I can't, for the life of me, appreciate or understand. (NFS: MW or Viva Piñata for example).

But for the sake of brevity: Splinter Cell DA, Shadowrun, Saints Row.

Army of two and Gears of War are my least favorite...

Nills

ditto.

although i havent played ao2 i can make an eduacated guess

DMC4 had some okay cutsceans but gameplay was pretty repetitive (Shoot, Slash, Grab, Repeat...)

I blame Nero

DMC4 had some okay cutsceans but gameplay was pretty repetitive (Shoot, Slash, Grab, Repeat...)

I blame Nero

The_360_Ghost

exactly instead of vergil they give us this homo nero

mine is cod4. overrated. what about you peopl?

haven79

[QUOTE="Aidan00000"]Two Worlds, it looked like it was on the playstation 1. And i bet some kid is going to comment shortley after me posting pictures and saying how two worlds its better then oblivion. Well kid who is going to do that, since the same kid has done it tiwce to me its not. Two Worlds is no were near or will ever be as good as oblivion. on gamespot or ign Two worlds is given a 6.something and oblivion is given a 9.something. As you can see clearly Two Worlds is terrible.Andrew_Xavier

I believe what I did was post pictures of a high ranked ps1 game, and then pictures of two worlds, demonstrating how it did not look like a ps1 game.

I also believe, what I said was the graphics were superior or at least on par with Oblivion's graphics, which they are, said nothing about the game itself.

If you are going to attempt to insult me, at least correctly quote me, thereby demonstrating that you have some basic knowledge of the subject you are attempting to "own". :)

I also only did it once :cry:

As per ratings, if you really feel like using ratings to determine if a game is good or not, it got a 7 on gamespot, which is above average, now, above average =/= terrible, really, only terrible = terrible, if it got a 4, perhaps, a 3, definitely, but an above average score does not equate to terrible. Besides, scores are useless points of comparison when attempt to disassemble opinion, realistically, I never went into your feelings on the gameplay, just simply decimated your attempt to call the graphics "playstation 1", and your brilliant story of how your random friend online felt they were the same.

You can hate the game, hate the mechanics, hate the voice-overs, but, posting things you know are simply incorrect is just asking for a quick comparative sample to demonstrate how wrong you truly are.

Andrew, this was one of the most satisfying posts I've ever read...

Congrats on that pure destruction. I was laughing with satisfaction by the end.

I love Two Worlds. Whole-heartedly agree.

Battle Field: Modern Combat.

Great on PS2, **** on Xbox 360.

i only played it for acheivments. borrowed it from a friend.

and two worlds wasnt terrible. it could have been a million times better, but theres worse out there.

Assassins creed, You beat the bosses then your pretty much done the story. Sure theres exploring to do, but that gets old quick.

Oh, and condemned 2 Bloodshot, its horrible, the only good thing is the creepy vibe and the goryness. The multiplayer is laggy and the story is decent.

[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]

[QUOTE="Aidan00000"]Two Worlds, it looked like it was on the playstation 1. And i bet some kid is going to comment shortley after me posting pictures and saying how two worlds its better then oblivion. Well kid who is going to do that, since the same kid has done it tiwce to me its not. Two Worlds is no were near or will ever be as good as oblivion. on gamespot or ign Two worlds is given a 6.something and oblivion is given a 9.something. As you can see clearly Two Worlds is terrible.destinhpark

I believe what I did was post pictures of a high ranked ps1 game, and then pictures of two worlds, demonstrating how it did not look like a ps1 game.

I also believe, what I said was the graphics were superior or at least on par with Oblivion's graphics, which they are, said nothing about the game itself.

If you are going to attempt to insult me, at least correctly quote me, thereby demonstrating that you have some basic knowledge of the subject you are attempting to "own". :)

I also only did it once :cry:

As per ratings, if you really feel like using ratings to determine if a game is good or not, it got a 7 on gamespot, which is above average, now, above average =/= terrible, really, only terrible = terrible, if it got a 4, perhaps, a 3, definitely, but an above average score does not equate to terrible. Besides, scores are useless points of comparison when attempt to disassemble opinion, realistically, I never went into your feelings on the gameplay, just simply decimated your attempt to call the graphics "playstation 1", and your brilliant story of how your random friend online felt they were the same.

You can hate the game, hate the mechanics, hate the voice-overs, but, posting things you know are simply incorrect is just asking for a quick comparative sample to demonstrate how wrong you truly are.

Andrew, this was one of the most satisfying posts I've ever read...

Congrats on that pure destruction. I was laughing with satisfaction by the end.

I love Two Worlds. Whole-heartedly agree.

Thanks,
I loved Two Worlds too, it showed to me that a *small* (people forget this about two worlds, they didn't have the money to afford patrick stewart you realize?) studio could make a really solid, enjoyable game. I'm almost sure considering the size of the studio, they'd consider the 7-7.5 ratings (above average) it's been receiving as big victories. I'm also sure, that thanks to the money they earned from Two Worlds, that the Two Worlds sequal will be a massive improvement, and I'll pre-order it too :)

PDZ.. overhyped/rated huge letdown

Mass effect.. wasnt for me.

cod4 is your least favorite game? You like Yaris and Undertow better? I don't understand how that's possible...

mine is Lost Planet