I know this is a weird question to ask, and that these games aren't really related at all, but which game is better? I've heard so many good things about both, but I want to know which is better. I want to buy one more game and have narrowed my list down to these. I play a lot of multiplayer, which is why I have L4D on the list, because I've already got CoD: WaW and GeoW2. But also, I've kind of got burnt out of multiplayer and live, so Fallout 3 could really sway me away, and I'm sure I could easily log 50 hours at least into it. But there's something abotu each that I like. Fallout 3 has an immersive and detailed world, but Left 4 Dead is a great co-op and multiplayer game that has a lot of replay value. I know Fallout 3 has gotten the better scores and awards, but Left 4 Dead just looks like simple fun.
Another thing I should bring up is that I think I could get bored with both. For those of you that have played both, which got more boring, faster? I mean, killing zombies is fun, but afterawhile, would get to be like a chore? I'm afraid I'll just buy it and then be like "oh, killing a million zombies was fun for the first five minutes, but now it's boring." And with Fallout 3, it just seems like the quests and gameplay would get to be like that also.
I have friends who have both, so playing by myself wouldn't/won't be a problem if I get L4D. If I didn't have friends who have L4D, I'd sure get Fallout 3, but co-op I've heard is amazing in L4D. Also, how is the MP in L4D, because I've really only heard about the single player campaign(s).
Thanks to all who contribute, and please just be honest. If you simply hated one game or the other, just tell me, I just want honest answers.
Log in to comment