Looking for opinions about FPS games

I'm currently planning to buy an FPS game, but I'm getting only one since I'm collecting the money for games what will be release later (like Batman or Dragon age), so here are mycandidats:

- FEAR 2: I like the scare moments, but it looks like its not too much to doafter you compleate the game
- Call of Juarez: Bound in blood: eeeha!! A wester shootout!!!! But it dousent look like a long game, it also dont looks too much replayable eather
- Condamned 2: loved the demo, the only thing I'm worried about is replayability. About the scare: for me its actually a GOOD thing that its less scary then the first one. I mean, I like horrors, and love to be disturbed, but I dont like to be TOO MUCH scared. Still, waiting for opinions.
- The chronicles of Riddic: Dark athena: looks cool, not to mention its basicly 2 games in one, and since I havent played the butcher bay.... but is it replayable?

I also like games with split-coop, multi is good but I dont realy care about it much. I also apreceate other game suggestions, but I own preaty much every popular and hight rated game. Thanks and all.

If you don't have it, battlefield: bad company or Battlefield 1943. You can get bad company for under 20 bucks, and 1943 for 15. (I would reccomend bad company, because in 1943 you only get 3 weapon choices.) You can buy it at gamestop, futureshop, walmart, etc.

Oh, and it has great online multiplayer.

I would recommend FEAR 2, it has some DLC that has been released for Multiplayer as well as single player. Condemned 2 doesn't have much replayability, i found the online to be boring. Scary rocks, the scarier the better. Chronicles of Riddick had a fun story, no replay value though and the online is terrible.

Bound in Blood focuses to much on the main characters lust, thus, i t failed to engage me. The online is ok but i still recommend FEAR 2...

I would definately recommend Call Of Juarez: Bound in BLood, you can read my review here: http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/callofjuarezboundinblood/player_review.html?id=674712&tag=all-about;review1

F.E.A.R. 2 was a great game to play through but I didn't find it quite as much fun as Call Of Juarez. If you're into Westerns Call of Juarez is the way to. (Dragon Age ORigins and Arkham Asylum FTW!)

Condemned 2:Bloodshot has no Online Multiplayer and virtually no replay value, Graphics were OK, and so was the gameplay, but it really isn't as Good as the other games you mentioned. (In my Opinion).

Dark Athena is Definately Brutal in its own way, but this also has almost no replay value. I found some Graphical Glitches while I was playing through the campaign (In Butchers Bay Riddick had a Blinking Black Spot on his head) and some of the enemies got stuck in the floor (Their Legs). Multiplayer is HORRENDOUS, it feels tacked on and it's really just not very good.

Out of your choices, I'd definitely go with Condemned 2. The gameplay is absolutely superb and the story is executed very well. It also has some great scares waiting for you!

Call of Duty World At War has Split Screen Co-Op and so does Gears of War 2. I'm not sure if you already own these though :shock:.

On the HArd or Very Hard Difficulty it will take you 7-10 hours to complete the Call of Juarez Story. Replay value is Moderate because you can't really use all the Awesome weapons you purchase near the end of the game. There are alot of Achievements you can go back and try to get though.