[QUOTE="hellfire9988"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"] [QUOTE="pbkick1"]I love the arcade. Sure there are some bad games but no one is forceing you to buy them. Vote with your dollar.Hoobinator
I do vote with my dollar, the only XBLA game I've ever bought is Catan. But it could have been so much more, could still be but MS has got to open up the marketplace to the developers and publishers.
Stop generalizing dude, in forums I hate when people say "It could have been so much more", be specific, give examples... Like XBLA could have been SO much better if MS put fantastic games like GEO wars, Worms, Hominid, bomberman 93' Hexic and small arms... Oh wait all of those great games are already on XBLA my bad
You want me to list every possible game that could or should come out on XBLA, I don't have the space.
- Streets of Rage 1,2,3
- Golden Axe 1,2
- System Shock 2
- Quake 1,2
- Chrono Trigger
- Chrono Cross
- Robocop vs Terminator
- Final Fight (Arcade)
- Alex the Kid
- King of Fighters series
- Nights into Dreams
- Diablo
- Popoulous
- Alpha Centauri
- Dungeon Keepe
These were all the ones that I listed right now. That does not include Turbo Grafx, Sega CD or Wonderswan games. There's literally dozens and dozens more.
Granted a lot of them aren't coin op ****cs, but there is nothing stopping MS from releasing these type of games, they have released a few none coin op ****cs already.
Â
Some of those I'd like also, but many that you mentioned run counter to what an "arcade" title is about. The idea behind XBLA is that the games are a little more casual and easy to pick up and play. It shouldn't be solely a dumping ground for old games. Nor should it be a general place digitally distributed games.
MS's reasoning is to keep consistency and to retain the service's identity as a place for arcade titles.
Even then, the retro games that are coming out aren't the product of mere emulation. Consider the work needed to add all of the standard 360 functionality.Â
Log in to comment