MOH Airborne Demo - Your rating?

7/10

The Pros: Good graphics, parachuting is a nice added feature.

The Cons: Another average WWII game, sloppy controls, and poor AI.

I didn't like that A was reload, cause it doesn't feel like Vegas or anything, the graphics were pretty much standard, but aside from that, I didn't mind the controls. xunhallowed

You don't like the control because it doesn't feel like another game you played?

............right

I didn't like that A was reload, cause it doesn't feel like Vegas or anything, the graphics were pretty much standard, but aside from that, I didn't mind the controls. xunhallowed

8.1/10

teh good: nice graphics , i loved the upgradeable gun system , you feel like you are in real war , you land wherever you want.

teh bad: somehow idiot enemies , the gun sounds doesnt feel real , im not feeling right about paying 80$ for that game , maybe roughly 30$ , theres something wrong about it that i dont know what is it

7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. VetteMan85

[QUOTE="xunhallowed"]I didn't like that A was reload, cause it doesn't feel like Vegas or anything, the graphics were pretty much standard, but aside from that, I didn't mind the controls. littleman1992

You don't like the control because it doesn't feel like another game you played?

............right

Well, that came out wrong. I meant to say A isn't exactly an ideal reloading button, since most people prefer X (like me), and only a game like Vegas could get away with it, since the franchise has used A to reload in the past. Medal of Honor has always kept a single control scheme, and I felt it worked better than the one in the demo. So, yeah, that's what I meant.

I would say definatly, high 8's, more in the range fo 8.5-9.0

Not the best game every, but very good none the less

7.5

Not a touch on Call of Duty. Graphics could be better and didnt really enjoy the demo at all.

OXM gave it a 7.5 and I think they got it right.

+ Hot multiplayer that puts a unique spin on a ubiquitous genre and setting.

+ Each scenario offers multiple approaches and strategies.

- Enemies are crack shots.

? Who's going to want to play as Axis in multiplayer?

7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. VetteMan85

i dont get how you find them from last gen i found them to be amazing.

I give it an 8.7.

[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. club-sandwich

Ya i mean WTF! The character models are amazing and the face detail is too. How can you diss the graphics.

I thought it was a blast! Im glad I fully preordered it. 8.5-9/10 for me.

[QUOTE="club-sandwich"][QUOTE="VetteMan85"]7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. Tundrawarlord

Ya i mean WTF! The character models are amazing and the face detail is too. How can you diss the graphics.

I thought it was a blast! Im glad I fully preordered it. 8.5-9/10 for me.

I didn't have a problem with the graphics.

about a 7.

Graphics = 8. they are really good at face value. the character models and environments are nice, and parachuting looks cool. but nothing in the environments is destructable, and it kind of seems like EA didn't pay much attention to anything but making it look cool. That takes away from the experience a bit. For example, one time I tried to shoot out a window, but instead of breaking the window just sprayed out some weird looking "glass" textures while the glass itself stayed whole.

Sound = 6.5. Pretty typical WW2 stuff. Bullets and orchestral music.

Gameplay = 7. Like the sound, the gameplay is par for the WW2 course. Nothing significant, but nothing terribly flawed.

Overall fun: 7/10. Good graphics and a parachuting gimmick that doesn't add too much to the game overall can't overcome the average elements. And if the general guys always tell you where the best spot to land is, why would you land anywhere else when playing seriously? The AI can be kind of stupid as well. One time one of the Allied soldiers got on a turret when there were no enemies nearby and started shooting it at a chandalier. I had already cleared the enemies from the upper floor, so what was he shooting at? And when he shot the chandalier with the turret, it didn't even do anything. Lame.

8/10

Good: Graphics are nice,parachuting is cool

Bad: Some dumb AI, Hit detection needs some fixing

8.5/10
I thought it was pretty good. The AI was pretty stupid though, a lot of them just run around like idiots. And another thing i noticed is that when shooting at the enemies torso,you need TWO shots from the M1 rifle for a kill. (that caliber only needs one shot for a clean kill)

Otherwise, good graphics, framerate and fun.

[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. club-sandwich

4.5/10

- Graphics need serious improvement

- Bad A.I.

- Gameplay is weak

- Story is not Original

[QUOTE="VetteMan85"]7.5/10. The graphics are from last gen, and the gameplay was very generic. hofuldig

Are you retarded? This game looks better than gears of war. unless youre playing it in full HD you shouldent rate it cause in 1080i on a 52 inch tv the game is spectacular!

7.5-8

+Visuals decent

+Cool Concept

+Real time weapon upgrades system

-AI = dookie

-respawning enemys

-Not Brothers in Arms Hells Highway

I was extremely disappointed. 5.0.

Graphics were wonderful, if you ask me, but everything else, from sound to just general gameplay, was sub par. The gun sounds were atrocious, and the parachuting feature had little affect on the gamplay, as you still go through the same mission and same process of doing said mission. AI...not what is was cracked up to be. Standard, even below average.