mulitplayer for bioshock

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Trueplaya1590
Trueplaya1590

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Trueplaya1590
Member since 2006 • 145 Posts

is bioshock going to have a muliplayer if so what is it going to be like.I got halfway throuht the demo ( i wish ther were checkpoints) the storyline is great and the graphics are insane especially the water and fire in the beinging of the demo.

also can u kill a bigdaddy?

Avatar image for jet2892
jet2892

2832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#2 jet2892
Member since 2004 • 2832 Posts

No there is no multiplayer

And yes im pretty sure you can kill the Big Daddys

Avatar image for Trueplaya1590
Trueplaya1590

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Trueplaya1590
Member since 2006 • 145 Posts
wow that terrible how long is the storymode. this is a major kick in the @ss the replay vaule is going to suffer, how many time can i play the storymode????
Avatar image for forgetwatyahear
forgetwatyahear

6260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 forgetwatyahear
Member since 2005 • 6260 Posts

i think if bioshock did have a multiplayer it would be a cheap add-on. I like the fact that it is a SP game

Avatar image for Bromz
Bromz

1639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Bromz
Member since 2005 • 1639 Posts
You can't kill them in demo will be able to in actual game. I personally don't mind not having fps multi, however I feel this game would have been perfect for co-op, its a shame.
Avatar image for zidan4000
zidan4000

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#6 zidan4000
Member since 2006 • 3167 Posts
you can kill the big daddies and you can make them fight for you too , and theres a checkpoints but they are not like a checkpoints , you see a small blue cabin , thats a checkpoints when you die you get revived there.
Avatar image for ODDFLAME
ODDFLAME

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 ODDFLAME
Member since 2004 • 35 Posts
I don't think it will be a problem considering the Singleplayer is going to be 25+ Hrs.
Avatar image for Spykezilla
Spykezilla

7652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#8 Spykezilla
Member since 2004 • 7652 Posts
I feel like I have seen a thread just like this one before...weird.
Avatar image for Trueplaya1590
Trueplaya1590

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Trueplaya1590
Member since 2006 • 145 Posts

I feel like I have seen a thread just like this one before...weird.Spykezilla

u probabaly did i created 2 by mistake and didn't realize the stickly also my bad

Avatar image for RojAvon
RojAvon

922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 RojAvon
Member since 2005 • 922 Posts

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

Avatar image for Trueplaya1590
Trueplaya1590

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Trueplaya1590
Member since 2006 • 145 Posts

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

RojAvon
your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer
Avatar image for zidan4000
zidan4000

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 zidan4000
Member since 2006 • 3167 Posts

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

RojAvon

agreed , even if bioshock had a multiplayer it will suck bad because the game based on its single player and on its storyline.

Avatar image for ss_49
ss_49

1337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ss_49
Member since 2007 • 1337 Posts
[QUOTE="RojAvon"]

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

Trueplaya1590

your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer

Uhhh...sure the devs could've added multiplayer...but would the SP still be over 30 hours long + multiple endings? NO. It would be 6 hours long with a crappy MP, just like the Darkness.

Avatar image for zidan4000
zidan4000

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 zidan4000
Member since 2006 • 3167 Posts
[QUOTE="Trueplaya1590"][QUOTE="RojAvon"]

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

ss_49

your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer

Uhhh...sure the devs could've added multiplayer...but would the SP still be over 30 hours long + multiple endings? NO. It would be 6 hours long with a crappy MP, just like the Darkness.

you got the words out of my mouth :shock: , i was about to say that but i changed my mind and i said something else.

Avatar image for Flavour666
Flavour666

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Flavour666
Member since 2003 • 345 Posts
The Darkness is WAY longer than six hours. It's impossible to finished the game on "normal" setting within six hours. Period. I love good SP games and don't give a flying f**k about MP. Stop bashing games because they don't feature MP.
Avatar image for deuceswld84
deuceswld84

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 deuceswld84
Member since 2004 • 691 Posts

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

RojAvon

Yeah. What he said.

your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer Trueplaya1590

You know I remember a time when great games had no MP what so ever. Some gamers now a days are spoiled when it comes to MP games. Its mostly the younger generation too.

Respect your roots.

Avatar image for konichiwa21
konichiwa21

4025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 konichiwa21
Member since 2005 • 4025 Posts

yeah bioshock is the first single player only game to come out in awhile

Avatar image for Ghost_Warrior
Ghost_Warrior

9002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#18 Ghost_Warrior
Member since 2003 • 9002 Posts
[QUOTE="RojAvon"]

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

deuceswld84

Yeah. What he said.

your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer Trueplaya1590

You know I remember a time when great games had no MP what so ever. Some gamers now a days are spoiled when it comes to MP games. Its mostly the younger generation too.

Respect your roots.

Totally agree, I can't stand it when people complain that a game has no multiplayer. Bioshock is a great game period, multiplayer won't make the game better.

Avatar image for PotatoSan
PotatoSan

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 PotatoSan
Member since 2005 • 3491 Posts
I can't stand it when people put down multiplayer with no reason to do so. If I'm spoiled because multiplayer games are way more fun than single player games, that's only a good thing. It means games are getting more fun to play.
Avatar image for VodkaLemIn
VodkaLemIn

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 VodkaLemIn
Member since 2005 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="RojAvon"]

I'm sick and tired of the concept that if a game doesn't have multiplayer then it sucks.

I'm glad people enjoy MP. Some games are perfect for it. Not everybody cares. Not having MP is not an excuse for docking percentage points from the rating.

There are plenty of mindless shoot-em-up games with MP if you want that. Dont rag other games just because they don't need it.

deuceswld84

Yeah. What he said.

your right by the game is only going to feel like a lackluster game to fill in the void from now until sep, when haol comes out the people are goping to say bioshock WHAT, dont get me wrong the graphics are insane, but its going to sufffer due to its lack of muliplayer, i sure the develpers could have created a decent muliplayer Trueplaya1590

You know I remember a time when great games had no MP what so ever. Some gamers now a days are spoiled when it comes to MP games. Its mostly the younger generation too.

Respect your roots.

Respect your roots? How about embrace change? The devs could have spent an extra month or two, and added a solid multiplayer. The single player isn't even all that good im my opinion. Sure the graphics were good, but the AI was horrible, they just ran at you with whatever weapon they had. If you bioshock fanboys don't want MP, then atleast spend that extra month to make intelligent AI.