MW2 to have WaW gore?

So I just played through WaW (I know, I'm late to the party) and I realized it had a decent amount of gore and dismemberment. While WaW was basically the COD4 engine, there have been obvious tweaks. Has it been announced that MW2 will keep this gore? If not, do you all think it would be a good idea?

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

I was fine with seeing peoples brains splat against a wall when I sniped them in MW.

Now everyone do not get me wrong i love gore. The most satisfying thing in the world is sniping someone in Gears of War. I love it. I just think it should at least be less gory than World at War.

Dismemberment and excess gore in games is useless to me. It just takes up essential memory. I was fine with CoD 4 blood, since it's slightly more realistic, and it can add to awesomeness in games if used correctly.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

Have you seen footage from the Iraq War? There's plenty of dismemberment to go around.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

Nah. I don't think the gore adds anything. Personally I think the game doesn't need it.

I dont know about you guys but it was pretty satisfying to knife a guy so hard that his arm would fly off xD however i don't mind if the gore remains intact.

[QUOTE="TOC48"]

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

CrazyyyDylan

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

[QUOTE="CrazyyyDylan"][QUOTE="TOC48"]

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

nope, leave the gore out of MW2

takes up disk space, uses more memory which could effect frame rate, and theres no point, it doesnt add anything to the game

i cant say i wasnt a fan of the gore in WaW. I love games like gears were the gore is somewhat over the top at times and other games like that. but in a cod game it just didnt look right.

[QUOTE="TOC48"]

[QUOTE="CrazyyyDylan"] Have you ever heard of IED's or Improvised Explosive Devices, they have been a huge killer to troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those roadside bombs rip through Humvee's like nothing and leave people dismembered if not dead.KoRn_Eddy_88

If it is realistic, keep the gore. If it isn't realistic get rid of the gore.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

[QUOTE="TOC48"]

[QUOTE="CrazyyyDylan"] Have you ever heard of IED's or Improvised Explosive Devices, they have been a huge killer to troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those roadside bombs rip through Humvee's like nothing and leave people dismembered if not dead.KoRn_Eddy_88

1. It wastes valuable memory

2. IW probably won't pose off Treyarch. It's the other way around.

3. I am not to remove someone's arm and leg with a knife hit.

4. I doubt there's a lot of blood squirting out like a child's water gun when someone shoots someone else.

5. With blood only when you headshot someone, some people feel accomplished or satisfied.

6. It doesn't fit with the CoD franchise.

This is mostly my opinion.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

I think MW2 should have gore like WAW, provided it's not overdone.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

i would not mind more gore at all i really liked it in waw but if its not gory ill get it anyway

never really noticed the gore in WAW, but for the gritty war feeling then yea i think it should be kept in, as for vehicual combat, HELL NO!, it ruined WAW with its Tank noobs, if they put tanks an stuff in an its jus as bad im going back to the original

Doesn't have to be full gore like WaW, but i'm an adult i like my entertainment so for shooters i expect some decent ammount of blood etc. or if you throw a grenade at an enemy i don't expect to just see him fly high up and body still fully intact i expect a head or leg flying off with it too.

I'd like to see it in, it makes taking someone out in multiplayer that little bit more satisfying, eg. shooting off your rivals leg after a 10 minute game of TD. Plus it probably appeals to a lot of gamers so I expect they'll keep it in, but I don't think it'll change the game in any large way. After all, I still think MW is a better game than WaW even though it doesn't have that gritty gore aspect.

I hope so. Just better than in WaW.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

wait, what?!? that makes no sense, how have bombs and bullets changed how they affect the human body? your saying that theres no dismemberment in battle anymore? that is straight up false my friend. i mean how are people still not "blown to kibbles and bits" anymore? u make no sense

[QUOTE="TOC48"]

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

Dracula888

wait, what?!? that makes no sense, how have bombs and bullets changed how they affect the human body? your saying that theres no dismemberment in battle anymore? that is straight up false my friend. i mean how are people still not "blown to kibbles and bits" anymore? u make no sense

I guess he's talking about how the fighting was much more brutal. Chemical weapons were used and flamethrowers were commonly used. It was less clean.

I think it should not keep the gore for Modern Warfare 2. It works with the WWII setting because it was like that. People being turned into pudding, Burned alive, and blown to kibbles and bits. It fits the mood. I dont think it works with todays standards because it is not like that. Not a huge war and no one blowing up.

TOC48

and yes there should be gore...its a video game..why not be blood, most people never expierience blowin peoples limbs off so thats where video games comes into play..and they should also leave the bodys permanently down for the rest of the match instead of them disappearing