This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Starmonkey98
Starmonkey98

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 Starmonkey98
Member since 2008 • 60 Posts

I had always played MW2 and thought that it was the all time best game ever created... I was wrong, 3 days ago I bought the new Battlefield Bad Company 2..... It was super amazing!!! I love it and I think MW2 sucks compared to it! But everybody keeps on rippin on Bad Company sayin its not a fun game! What do you think!

Avatar image for IzzieWaru
IzzieWaru

905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 IzzieWaru
Member since 2010 • 905 Posts

Another one of these?

Avatar image for Tomemogus
Tomemogus

245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Tomemogus
Member since 2010 • 245 Posts

I think if you prefer spending more time running around and slower paced gameplay then BFBC2 is for you. I prefer MW2 over it.

Avatar image for giantqtipz
giantqtipz

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 giantqtipz
Member since 2010 • 884 Posts

to be honest i traded in mw2 for battlefield bc 2

ive played all the battlefield games in the series (except 2142) so i knew what i wanted. but MW2 isn't bad either. its faster paced and more action packed. but i like bc2 because ive always been a fan of war games set in large environments.

Avatar image for roscoedash23
roscoedash23

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 roscoedash23
Member since 2010 • 115 Posts

Everybody was on the BFBC2 band wagon for like a couple months...sinec then everybody has gone back to MW2, LETS FACE IT. We all new that people would be playing MW2 a year after release BC2...well it had a great run.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#6 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

BC2 for me, always.

Avatar image for Kaim91
Kaim91

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Kaim91
Member since 2010 • 967 Posts

It all depends on what kind of war game you like. Smaller maps with more fast-paced action or the other way around. Personally, I play and thoroughly enjoy both of them.

Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts

BC2 for sure way better and its noot that slow paced i mean when you have tanks and APCs coming in there really intense moments i love battlefield cant wait for Battlefield 3

Avatar image for MisterEditor
MisterEditor

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MisterEditor
Member since 2010 • 185 Posts
MW2 was OK...looking forward to playing BC 2 at some point. I enjoyed BC 1 much more than MW 1.
Avatar image for D0ub13_5c0r3
D0ub13_5c0r3

2084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 D0ub13_5c0r3
Member since 2009 • 2084 Posts
BC2 is slow paced compared to MW2, but I enjoy playing it. But I'd rather play MW2 over it, just because it's more fast paced.
Avatar image for gta4_2112
gta4_2112

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 gta4_2112
Member since 2007 • 3270 Posts

BC2 is way more balanced than MW2, but I play more MW2. Lately I've been playing alot of BC2.

Avatar image for laliberte11
laliberte11

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 laliberte11
Member since 2008 • 4246 Posts

i didnt like bfbc2, but mw2 is fun...and Im starting to get good at it :P

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#13 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

I prefer MW2.

Avatar image for sharkbiscuit79
sharkbiscuit79

1142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 sharkbiscuit79
Member since 2009 • 1142 Posts

BF:BC2 for sure, total newbie to the series. This game online has given me so many personal gaming highlights, also I have for the first time in almost 5 years of owning a 360 have a group of 7 friends that all play for fun but also gives us 2full squads. This is the first time I have properly worked as part of a team.

As for people saying this game is slow paced stop camping in the bushes with a sniper rifle and get in the fight. Or learn to shoot without CoD's auto aim.

Highlights include ( and bear in mind there MY highlights andthat some more skilled playershave done multiple times )

Entering the game online for the first time, seeing huge maps explosions, tanks, UAV, Helicopters ect ect a proper battlefield.

Sniping a helicopter pilot.

Racking up over 5000 points in one game as a medic ( TEAMWORK !!!!).

Getting a double headshot kill with one bullet.

Hitting a jeep with an RPG only for it to somersault head to tail over me in a ball of flamesfollowed by the message Triple Kill.

Getting a tank kill with an RPG from the entire width of the map taking gravity into consideration.

I could go on all night. Although a steep learning curve this game is so rewarding. If I want to run and gun I can play pretty much any FPS online. If I want fun Battlefield is where its at.

Infact I probably wont pick another CoD up for a long long time!

Avatar image for XBonteeX
XBonteeX

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 XBonteeX
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
In CoDMW2, most people would keep playing and not give up if they were the only one left on their team. In BFBC2, you would most likely quit the game immediately. The reason being, in CoD, you could (If you are good) mow down everyone on the other team, while in BFBC2, you need to rely more on teamwork or you're dead, and its more realistic that way, giving you more of a challenge. CoD is more like, run in a room and spray everyone down in five seconds, Battlefield makes you think and plan out what you do before you do it. Personally I choose CoD because playing Battlefield for too long gives me headaches... But they are both awesome games!
Avatar image for MAG_19
MAG_19

71

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MAG_19
Member since 2010 • 71 Posts
Iv'e played BFBC2 online then I played Modern Warfare 1 and 2 online. . . . . . . . All I have to say is Bad Company 2 is better than Modern Warfare 1 and 2. Reasons - Explosions, Tanks, jeeps, helicopters, ATV's, more fast paced, more difficult once you get good at BC2 you can dominate MW2, at least I did. It has way bigger maps, graphics are much better. MW2 looks kinda flat and it doesn't feel real to me. BC2 has great graphics, It's has more texture and it looks like your actually in a real battle.
Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts

You didn't join in on these conversations when they both came out? Battlefield has always been the superior title.

Avatar image for Gamefreak1296
Gamefreak1296

1670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Gamefreak1296
Member since 2005 • 1670 Posts

They are two different worlds

MW2= CQB (thats Close Quarter Battles) and Battlefield is large open combat...

Avatar image for ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ
Member since 2007 • 1987 Posts

I had always played MW2 and thought that it was the all time best game ever created... I was wrong, 3 days ago I bought the new Battlefield Bad Company 2..... It was super amazing!!! I love it and I think MW2 sucks compared to it! But everybody keeps on rippin on Bad Company sayin its not a fun game! What do you think!

Starmonkey98

MW2 and BFBC2 are both great games, but i did prefer BFBC2 over MW2.

Avatar image for Drakebunny
Drakebunny

3029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Drakebunny
Member since 2008 • 3029 Posts

I've never played Call of Duty, and I've only played Battlefield games. I would love to play a Call of Duty game though, just to get a taste of the opposite spectrum.

Avatar image for robbie80
robbie80

988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 robbie80
Member since 2005 • 988 Posts
Well your right mw2 is a fast paced camping with unbalance preaks and overkill killstreak were as bfbc2 is a little slower paced game with balance gameplay and time to think your movements .I play both for me bfbc2 more fun because mw2 can be annoying as hell sometime.
Avatar image for JU5T1N-
JU5T1N-

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 JU5T1N-
Member since 2010 • 135 Posts
MW2 is like a big game of paintball. BC2 is like a big game of war.
Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts

I hate when people say they don't like Battlefield because it is "to slow" If you think it is to slow you haven't played it longer then 4 seconds. As big as it is, it can be CQC too.

Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts
bfbc2 i=much more balanced nice paced gameplay not cheap omg what was that *looks to the left* damn you noob tube
Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts
^It IS balanced, but it is crazy they "nerfed" things so they were "like the other". For example, they made the Vehicle Reload Speed slower to be fair. . . If you take it you should of COURSE shoot faster.
Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts
^It IS balanced, but it is crazy they "nerfed" things so they were "like the other". For example, they made the Vehicle Reload Speed slower to be fair. . . If you take it you should of COURSE shoot faster.jad206
yes but they nerffed stuff to make it balance when has mw nerfed anything???
Avatar image for lil_d_mack_314
lil_d_mack_314

13969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 lil_d_mack_314
Member since 2006 • 13969 Posts

I hate when people say they don't like Battlefield because it is "to slow" If you think it is to slow you haven't played it longer then 4 seconds. As big as it is, it can be CQC too.

jad206

I have to agree with you on that note. Like some one else said "I traded in my copy of MW2 for BFBC2" I traded in my copie of MW2 along with my bros for 2 copies of BFBC2". I just got sick of every thing that was wrong with MW2 at the time...still is? I played some of BC1 and enjoyed it, also loved the demo so I went with it.

Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
BF:BC 2 is a lot of fun but damn this is the new camping king COD stands no chance of ever beating it. I still prefer BF:BC 2 but damn are there a lot of snipers and kids hiding behind almost every corner possible.
Avatar image for NoDzombie
NoDzombie

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 NoDzombie
Member since 2009 • 1483 Posts

i play and enjoy both, but if i was forced to choose i would have to say that BF:BC2 is the better game, in my opinion

Avatar image for lil_d_mack_314
lil_d_mack_314

13969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 lil_d_mack_314
Member since 2006 • 13969 Posts
BF:BC 2 is a lot of fun but damn this is the new camping king COD stands no chance of ever beating it. I still prefer BF:BC 2 but damn are there a lot of snipers and kids hiding behind almost every corner possible.craigalan23
Yeh there are a lot of useless recon players (haven't seen many around lately). But in rush I expect there to be people to be defending the objective(s) "M-COMs". I haven't ever seen camping as bad as it was in MW2. Ever.
Avatar image for BlackDevil99
BlackDevil99

2329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 BlackDevil99
Member since 2003 • 2329 Posts
Call of duty for me
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
[QUOTE="craigalan23"]BF:BC 2 is a lot of fun but damn this is the new camping king COD stands no chance of ever beating it. I still prefer BF:BC 2 but damn are there a lot of snipers and kids hiding behind almost every corner possible.lil_d_mack_314
Yeh there are a lot of useless recon players (haven't seen many around lately). But in rush I expect there to be people to be defending the objective(s) "M-COMs". I haven't ever seen camping as bad as it was in MW2. Ever.

I only play Conquest and there are campers everywhere and they are a lot more difficult to kill than they are in MW2. I will never play hardcore again about 50% of the players are snipers and that is just ridiculous and useless in conquest. No matter what game mode I play there are campers which as you said is to be expected in Rush but not as many as there are in other modes. It is fine though as I typically stay in cover while moving but it can be frustrating when you respawn as it tends to respawn you in terrible locations.
Avatar image for jad206
jad206

1821

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 jad206
Member since 2009 • 1821 Posts
[QUOTE="jad206"]^It IS balanced, but it is crazy they "nerfed" things so they were "like the other". For example, they made the Vehicle Reload Speed slower to be fair. . . If you take it you should of COURSE shoot faster.Killmckillerkil
yes but they nerffed stuff to make it balance when has mw nerfed anything???

But it was balanced. They nerfed some Medic LMGS to be more like [inser LMG], where is the difference then? I mean I love that game, but that really was annoying. Side rant, what is up with all the Snipers? This isn't MW, you need to ARM it and DEFEND it, not just get kills.
Avatar image for Killmckillerkil
Killmckillerkil

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Killmckillerkil
Member since 2010 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="Killmckillerkil"][QUOTE="jad206"]^It IS balanced, but it is crazy they "nerfed" things so they were "like the other". For example, they made the Vehicle Reload Speed slower to be fair. . . If you take it you should of COURSE shoot faster.jad206
yes but they nerffed stuff to make it balance when has mw nerfed anything???

But it was balanced. They nerfed some Medic LMGS to be more like [inser LMG], where is the difference then? I mean I love that game, but that really was annoying. Side rant, what is up with all the Snipers? This isn't MW, you need to ARM it and DEFEND it, not just get kills.

agreed i used to snipe all the time when i got it but now i just snipe when i defend(no point when ur assaulting) and i like to use every class now i dnt have a favorite
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
[QUOTE="lil_d_mack_314"][QUOTE="craigalan23"]BF:BC 2 is a lot of fun but damn this is the new camping king COD stands no chance of ever beating it. I still prefer BF:BC 2 but damn are there a lot of snipers and kids hiding behind almost every corner possible.craigalan23
Yeh there are a lot of useless recon players (haven't seen many around lately). But in rush I expect there to be people to be defending the objective(s) "M-COMs". I haven't ever seen camping as bad as it was in MW2. Ever.

I only play Conquest and there are campers everywhere and they are a lot more difficult to kill than they are in MW2. I will never play hardcore again about 50% of the players are snipers and that is just ridiculous and useless in conquest. No matter what game mode I play there are campers which as you said is to be expected in Rush but not as many as there are in other modes. It is fine though as I typically stay in cover while moving but it can be frustrating when you respawn as it tends to respawn you in terrible locations.

for some reason i dont think conquest has been done right for BF since BF2, that game was ridiculous fun. I also wouldnt be able to pinpoint what has been done incorrectly, just has never played the same
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
Sadly I missed all of the older BF games and Battlefield Bad Company was my first. It looks like a lot of fun too.